24.04.2014 Views

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

144 SHINICHI MOCHIZUKI<br />

—where † D ⊚± is a category equivalent to D ⊚± ; T is an F ± l -torsor; † F T = { † F t } t∈T<br />

is a capsule <strong>of</strong> F-prime-strips, indexed by [the underlying set <strong>of</strong>] T —tobea<br />

D-Θ ell -bridge † φ Θell<br />

± : † D T → † D ⊚± —wherewewrite † D T for the capsule <strong>of</strong> D-<br />

prime-strips associated to † F T [cf. Remark 5.2.1, (i)]. We define a(n) [iso]morphism<br />

<strong>of</strong> Θ ell -bridges<br />

( † † ψ Θell<br />

±<br />

F T −→ † D ⊚± ) → ( ‡ F T ′<br />

to be a pair <strong>of</strong> poly-isomorphisms<br />

‡ ψ Θell<br />

±<br />

−→ ‡ D ⊚± )<br />

† F T<br />

∼<br />

→ ‡ F T ′;<br />

† D ⊚± ∼<br />

→ ‡ D ⊚±<br />

that determines a morphism between the associated D-Θ ell -bridges † φ Θell<br />

± , ‡ φ Θell<br />

± .<br />

There is an evident notion <strong>of</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> morphisms <strong>of</strong> D-Θ ell -bridges.<br />

(iii) We define a Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theater [relative to the given initial Θ-data] to be<br />

a collection <strong>of</strong> data<br />

† HT Θ±ell =( † † ψ Θ±<br />

±<br />

F ≻ ←− † † ψ Θell<br />

±<br />

F T −→ † D ⊚± )<br />

— where the data † ψ± Θ± : † F T → † F ≻ forms a Θ ± -bridge; the data † ψ Θell : † F T →<br />

† D ⊚± forms a Θ ell -bridge — such that the associated data { † φ Θ±<br />

± , † φ Θell<br />

± } [cf. (i),<br />

(ii)] forms a D-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theater. A(n) [iso]morphism <strong>of</strong> Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters<br />

is defined to be a pair <strong>of</strong> morphisms between the respective associated Θ ± -and<br />

Θ ell -bridges that are compatible with one another in the sense that they induce the<br />

same poly-isomorphism between the respective capsules <strong>of</strong> F-prime-strips. There<br />

is an evident notion <strong>of</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> morphisms <strong>of</strong> Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters.<br />

Corollary 6.12. (Isomorphisms <strong>of</strong> Θ ± -Bridges, Θ ell -Bridges, and Θ ±ell -<br />

<strong>Hodge</strong> <strong>Theaters</strong>) Relative to a fixed collection <strong>of</strong> initial Θ-data:<br />

(i) The natural functorially induced map from the set <strong>of</strong> isomorphisms between<br />

two Θ ± -bridges (respectively, two Θ ell -bridges; two Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters)<br />

to the set <strong>of</strong> isomorphisms between the respective associated D-Θ ± -bridges<br />

(respectively, associated D-Θ ell -bridges; associated D-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters)<br />

is bijective.<br />

(ii) Given a Θ ± -bridge and a Θ ell -bridge, the set <strong>of</strong> capsule-+-full poly-isomorphisms<br />

between the respective capsules <strong>of</strong> F-prime-strips which allow one to glue<br />

the given Θ ± -andΘ ell -bridges together to form a Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theater forms a<br />

torsor over the group<br />

F ⋊±<br />

l<br />

×<br />

({±1} V)<br />

[cf. Proposition 6.6, (iv)]. Moreover, the first factor may be thought <strong>of</strong> as corresponding<br />

to the induced isomorphisms <strong>of</strong> F ± l<br />

-torsors between the index sets <strong>of</strong> the<br />

capsules involved.<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>. Assertions (i), (ii) follow immediately from Definition 6.11; Corollary 5.3,<br />

(ii) [cf. also Proposition 6.6, (iv), in the case <strong>of</strong> assertion (ii)]. ○

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!