Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY I 141<br />
whose output data satisfies the same indeterminacy properties with respect to labels<br />
as the output data <strong>of</strong> the functor <strong>of</strong> (i).<br />
(iii) The functors <strong>of</strong> (i), (ii) are compatible, respectively, with the functors <strong>of</strong><br />
Proposition 4.11, (i), (ii), relative to the functor [i.e., determined by the functorial<br />
algorithm] <strong>of</strong> Proposition 6.7, in the sense that the natural inclusions<br />
S j = {1,... ,j} ↩→ S± t = {0, 1,... ,t− 1}<br />
[cf. the notation <strong>of</strong> Proposition 4.11] — where j =1,... ,l ,andt def<br />
= j +1 —<br />
determine natural transformations<br />
† φ Θ±<br />
± ↦→<br />
† φ Θ±<br />
± ↦→<br />
(<br />
)<br />
Prc( † D T ) ↩→ Prc( † D T )<br />
)<br />
(Prc( † D ⊢ T<br />
) ↩→ Prc( † D ⊢ T )<br />
from the respective composites <strong>of</strong> the functors <strong>of</strong> Proposition 4.11, (i), (ii), with the<br />
functor [determined by the functorial algorithm] <strong>of</strong> Proposition 6.7 to the functors<br />
<strong>of</strong> (i), (ii).<br />
Pro<strong>of</strong>.<br />
Assertions (i), (ii), (iii) follow immediately from the definitions. ○<br />
The following result is an immediate consequence <strong>of</strong> our discussion.<br />
Corollary 6.10. (Étale-pictures <strong>of</strong> Base-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> <strong>Theaters</strong>) Relative<br />
to a fixed collection <strong>of</strong> initial Θ-data:<br />
(i) Consider the [composite] functor<br />
† HT D-Θ±ell ↦→ † D > ↦→ † D ⊢ ><br />
— from the category <strong>of</strong> D-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters and isomorphisms <strong>of</strong> D-Θ ±ell -<br />
<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters to the category <strong>of</strong> D ⊢ -prime-strips and isomorphisms <strong>of</strong> D ⊢ -primestrips<br />
— obtained by assigning to the D-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theater † HT D-Θ±ell<br />
the monoanalyticization<br />
[cf. Definition 4.1, (iv)] † D ⊢ > <strong>of</strong> the D-prime-strip † D > associated,<br />
via the functorial algorithm <strong>of</strong> Proposition 6.7, to the underlying D-Θ ± -bridge<br />
<strong>of</strong> † HT D-Θ±ell .If † HT D-Θ±ell , ‡ HT D-Θ±ell<br />
are D-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters, thenwe<br />
define the base-Θ ±ell -, or D-Θ ±ell -, link<br />
† HT D-Θ±ell D<br />
−→<br />
‡ HT D-Θ±ell<br />
from † HT D-Θ±ell to ‡ HT D-Θ±ell to be the full poly-isomorphism<br />
† D ⊢ ><br />
∼<br />
→ ‡ D ⊢ ><br />
between the D ⊢ -prime-strips obtained by applying the functor discussed above to<br />
† HT D-Θ±ell , ‡ HT D-Θ±ell .