24.04.2014 Views

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY I 141<br />

whose output data satisfies the same indeterminacy properties with respect to labels<br />

as the output data <strong>of</strong> the functor <strong>of</strong> (i).<br />

(iii) The functors <strong>of</strong> (i), (ii) are compatible, respectively, with the functors <strong>of</strong><br />

Proposition 4.11, (i), (ii), relative to the functor [i.e., determined by the functorial<br />

algorithm] <strong>of</strong> Proposition 6.7, in the sense that the natural inclusions<br />

S j = {1,... ,j} ↩→ S± t = {0, 1,... ,t− 1}<br />

[cf. the notation <strong>of</strong> Proposition 4.11] — where j =1,... ,l ,andt def<br />

= j +1 —<br />

determine natural transformations<br />

† φ Θ±<br />

± ↦→<br />

† φ Θ±<br />

± ↦→<br />

(<br />

)<br />

Prc( † D T ) ↩→ Prc( † D T )<br />

)<br />

(Prc( † D ⊢ T<br />

) ↩→ Prc( † D ⊢ T )<br />

from the respective composites <strong>of</strong> the functors <strong>of</strong> Proposition 4.11, (i), (ii), with the<br />

functor [determined by the functorial algorithm] <strong>of</strong> Proposition 6.7 to the functors<br />

<strong>of</strong> (i), (ii).<br />

Pro<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Assertions (i), (ii), (iii) follow immediately from the definitions. ○<br />

The following result is an immediate consequence <strong>of</strong> our discussion.<br />

Corollary 6.10. (Étale-pictures <strong>of</strong> Base-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> <strong>Theaters</strong>) Relative<br />

to a fixed collection <strong>of</strong> initial Θ-data:<br />

(i) Consider the [composite] functor<br />

† HT D-Θ±ell ↦→ † D > ↦→ † D ⊢ ><br />

— from the category <strong>of</strong> D-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters and isomorphisms <strong>of</strong> D-Θ ±ell -<br />

<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters to the category <strong>of</strong> D ⊢ -prime-strips and isomorphisms <strong>of</strong> D ⊢ -primestrips<br />

— obtained by assigning to the D-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theater † HT D-Θ±ell<br />

the monoanalyticization<br />

[cf. Definition 4.1, (iv)] † D ⊢ > <strong>of</strong> the D-prime-strip † D > associated,<br />

via the functorial algorithm <strong>of</strong> Proposition 6.7, to the underlying D-Θ ± -bridge<br />

<strong>of</strong> † HT D-Θ±ell .If † HT D-Θ±ell , ‡ HT D-Θ±ell<br />

are D-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters, thenwe<br />

define the base-Θ ±ell -, or D-Θ ±ell -, link<br />

† HT D-Θ±ell D<br />

−→<br />

‡ HT D-Θ±ell<br />

from † HT D-Θ±ell to ‡ HT D-Θ±ell to be the full poly-isomorphism<br />

† D ⊢ ><br />

∼<br />

→ ‡ D ⊢ ><br />

between the D ⊢ -prime-strips obtained by applying the functor discussed above to<br />

† HT D-Θ±ell , ‡ HT D-Θ±ell .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!