24.04.2014 Views

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

140 SHINICHI MOCHIZUKI<br />

/ ± ↩→ / ± / ± ↩→ / ± / ± / ± ↩→ ... ↩→ / ± / ± / ± ... / ±<br />

Fig. 6.2: An l ± -procession <strong>of</strong> D-prime-strips<br />

Proposition 6.9. (Processions <strong>of</strong> Base-Prime-Strips) Relative to a fixed<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> initial Θ-data:<br />

(i) (Holomorphic Processions) Given a D-Θ ± -bridge † φ Θ±<br />

± : † D T → † D ≻ ,<br />

with underlying capsule <strong>of</strong> D-prime-strips † D T , write Prc( † D T ) for the l ± -procession<br />

<strong>of</strong> D-prime-strips [cf. Fig. 6.2, where each “/ ± ” denotes a D-prime-strip] determined<br />

by considering the [“sub”]capsules <strong>of</strong> the capsule † D |T | <strong>of</strong> Definition 6.4, (i),<br />

corresponding to the subsets S ± 1 ⊆ ...⊆ S± def<br />

t = {0, 1, 2,... ,t−1} ⊆...⊆ S ± l<br />

= |F ± l |<br />

[where, by abuse <strong>of</strong> notation, we use the notation for nonnegative integers to denote<br />

the images <strong>of</strong> these nonnegative integers in |F l |], relative to the bijection |T | →|F ∼ l |<br />

determined by the F ± l<br />

-group structure <strong>of</strong> T [cf. Definition 6.4, (i)]. Then the assignment<br />

† φ Θ±<br />

± ↦→ Prc( † D T ) determines a [well-defined, up to a unique isomorphism!]<br />

natural functor<br />

category <strong>of</strong><br />

D-Θ ± -bridges<br />

and isomorphisms <strong>of</strong><br />

D-Θ ± -bridges<br />

→<br />

category <strong>of</strong> processions<br />

<strong>of</strong> D-prime-strips<br />

and morphisms <strong>of</strong><br />

processions<br />

† φ Θ±<br />

± ↦→ Prc( † D T )<br />

whose output data satisfies the following property: there are precisely n possibilities<br />

for the element ∈|F l | to which a given index <strong>of</strong> the index set <strong>of</strong> the n-capsule<br />

that appears in the procession constituted by this output data corresponds, prior to<br />

the application <strong>of</strong> this functor. That is to say, by taking the product, over elements<br />

<strong>of</strong> |F l |, <strong>of</strong> cardinalities <strong>of</strong> “sets <strong>of</strong> possibilies”, one concludes that<br />

by considering processions — i.e., the functor discussed above, possibly<br />

pre-composed with the functor † HT D-Θ±ell ↦→ † φ Θ±<br />

± that associates to a<br />

D-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theater its associated D-Θ ± -bridge — the indeterminacy<br />

consisting <strong>of</strong> (l ± ) (l±) possibilities that arises in Proposition 6.8, (ii), is<br />

reduced to an indeterminacy consisting <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> l ± ! possibilities.<br />

(ii) (Mono-analytic Processions) By composing the functor <strong>of</strong> (i) with the<br />

mono-analyticization operation discussed in Definition 4.1, (iv), one obtains a<br />

[well-defined, up to a unique isomorphism!] natural functor<br />

category <strong>of</strong><br />

D-Θ ± -bridges<br />

and isomorphisms <strong>of</strong><br />

D-Θ ± -bridges<br />

→<br />

category <strong>of</strong> processions<br />

<strong>of</strong> D ⊢ -prime-strips<br />

and morphisms <strong>of</strong><br />

processions<br />

† φ Θ±<br />

± ↦→ Prc( † D ⊢ T )

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!