Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
138 SHINICHI MOCHIZUKI<br />
Remark 6.6.1. The underlying combinatorial structure <strong>of</strong> a D-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong><br />
theater — or, essentially equivalently [cf. Definition 6.11, Corollary 6.12 below], <strong>of</strong><br />
aΘ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theater — is illustrated in Fig. 6.1 above. Thus, Fig. 6.1 may be<br />
thought <strong>of</strong> as a sort <strong>of</strong> additive analogue <strong>of</strong> the multiplicative situation illustrated<br />
in Fig. 4.4. In Fig. 6.1, the “⇑” corresponds to the associated [D-]Θ ± -bridge, while<br />
the “⇓” corresponds to the associated [D-]Θ ell -bridge; the“/ ± ’s” denote D-primestrips.<br />
Proposition 6.7. (Base-Θ-Bridges Associated to Base-Θ ± -Bridges) Relative<br />
to a fixed collection <strong>of</strong> initial Θ-data, let<br />
†<br />
† φ Θ±<br />
±<br />
D T −→<br />
† D ≻<br />
be a D-Θ ± -bridge, as in Definition 6.4, (i). Then by replacing † D T by † D T [cf.<br />
Definition 6.4, (i)], identifying the D-prime-strip † D ≻ with the D-prime-strip † D 0<br />
via † φ Θ±<br />
0 [cf. the discussion <strong>of</strong> Definition 6.4, (i)] to form a D-prime-strip † D > ,<br />
replacing the various +-full poly-morphisms that occur in † φ Θ±<br />
± at the v ∈ V good<br />
by the corresponding full poly-morphisms, and replacing the various +-full polymorphisms<br />
that occur in † φ Θ±<br />
± at the v ∈ V bad by the poly-morphisms described [via<br />
group-theoretic algorithms!] in Example 4.4, (i), (ii), we obtain a functorial<br />
algorithm for constructing a [well-defined, up to a unique isomorphism!] D-Θbridge<br />
† † φ Θ <br />
D T −→ † D ><br />
as in Definition 4.6, (ii). Thus, the newly constructed D-Θ-bridge is related to the<br />
given D-Θ ± -bridge via the following correspondences:<br />
† D T | (T \{0}) ↦→ † D T ;<br />
† D 0 , † D ≻ ↦→ † D ><br />
— each <strong>of</strong> which maps precisely two D-prime-strips to a single D-prime-strip.<br />
Pro<strong>of</strong>. The various assertions <strong>of</strong> Proposition 6.7 follow immediately from the<br />
various definitions involved. ○<br />
Next, we consider additive analogues <strong>of</strong> Propositions 4.9, 4.11; Corollary 4.12.<br />
Proposition 6.8. (Symmetries arising from Forgetful Functors) Relative<br />
to a fixed collection <strong>of</strong> initial Θ-data:<br />
(i) (Base-Θ ell -Bridges) The operation <strong>of</strong> associating to a D-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theater<br />
the underlying D-Θ ell -bridge <strong>of</strong> the D-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theater determines a natural<br />
functor<br />
category <strong>of</strong><br />
D-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters<br />
and isomorphisms <strong>of</strong><br />
D-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters<br />
→<br />
category <strong>of</strong><br />
D-Θ ell -bridges<br />
and isomorphisms <strong>of</strong><br />
D-Θ ell -bridges<br />
† HT D-Θ±ell ↦→ ( † D T † φ Θell<br />
±<br />
−→ † D ⊚± )