24.04.2014 Views

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

134 SHINICHI MOCHIZUKI<br />

∼<br />

— where we require that the bijection <strong>of</strong> index sets F l → T induced by the second<br />

isomorphism determine an isomorphism <strong>of</strong> F ± l<br />

-torsors — conjugation by which<br />

maps φ Θell<br />

± ↦→ † φ Θell<br />

± . We define a(n) [iso]morphism <strong>of</strong> D-Θ ell -bridges<br />

( † † φ Θell<br />

±<br />

D T −→ † D ⊚± ) → ( ‡ D T<br />

′<br />

to be a pair <strong>of</strong> poly-morphisms<br />

‡ φ Θell<br />

±<br />

−→ ‡ D ⊚± )<br />

† D T<br />

∼<br />

→ ‡ D T ′;<br />

† D ⊚± ∼<br />

→ ‡ D ⊚±<br />

—where † ∼<br />

D T → ‡ D T<br />

′ is a capsule-+-full poly-isomorphism whose induced morphism<br />

on index sets T → ∼ T ′ is an isomorphism <strong>of</strong> F ± l -torsors; † D ⊚± → ‡ D ⊚± is a<br />

poly-morphism which is an Aut csp ( † D ⊚± )- [or, equivalently, Aut csp ( ‡ D ⊚± )-] orbit<br />

<strong>of</strong> isomorphisms — which are compatible with † φ Θell<br />

± , ‡ φ Θell<br />

± . There is an evident<br />

notion <strong>of</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> morphisms <strong>of</strong> D-Θ ell -bridges.<br />

(iii) We define a base-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theater, orD-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theater, [relative<br />

to the given initial Θ-data] to be a collection <strong>of</strong> data<br />

† HT D-Θ±ell =( † † φ Θ±<br />

±<br />

D ≻ ←− † † φ Θell<br />

±<br />

D T −→ † D ⊚± )<br />

—whereT is a F ± l -group; † φ Θ±<br />

± is a D-Θ ± -bridge; † φ Θell<br />

± is a D-Θ ell -bridge [relative<br />

to the F ± l -torsor structure determined by the F± l<br />

-group structure on T ]—such<br />

that there exist isomorphisms<br />

D ≻<br />

∼<br />

→ † D ≻ ; D ±<br />

∼<br />

→ † D T ; D ⊚± ∼<br />

→ † D ⊚±<br />

conjugation by which maps φ Θ±<br />

± ↦→ † φ Θ±<br />

± , φ Θell<br />

± ↦→ † φ Θell<br />

± . A(n) [iso]morphism <strong>of</strong><br />

D-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters is defined to be a pair <strong>of</strong> morphisms between the respective<br />

associated D-Θ ± -andD-Θ ell -bridges that are compatible with one another in the<br />

sense that they induce the same poly-isomorphism between the respective capsules<br />

<strong>of</strong> D-prime-strips. There is an evident notion <strong>of</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> morphisms <strong>of</strong> D-<br />

Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters.<br />

The following additive analogue <strong>of</strong> Proposition 4.7 follows immediately from<br />

the various definitions involved. Put another way, the content <strong>of</strong> Proposition 6.5<br />

below may be thought <strong>of</strong> as a sort <strong>of</strong> “intrinsic version” <strong>of</strong> the constructions carried<br />

out in Examples 6.2, 6.3.<br />

Proposition 6.5.<br />

Bridges) Let<br />

(Transport <strong>of</strong> ±-Label Classes <strong>of</strong> Cusps via Base-<br />

† HT D-Θ±ell =( † † φ Θ±<br />

±<br />

D ≻ ←− † † φ Θell<br />

±<br />

D T −→ † D ⊚± )<br />

be a D-Θ ±ell -<strong>Hodge</strong> theater [relative to the given initial Θ-data]. Then:<br />

(i) For each v ∈ V, t ∈ T ,theD-Θ ell -bridge † φ Θell<br />

± induces a [single, welldefined!]<br />

bijection <strong>of</strong> sets <strong>of</strong> ±-label classes <strong>of</strong> cusps<br />

† ζ Θell<br />

v t<br />

: LabCusp ± ( † D vt ) ∼ → LabCusp ± ( † D ⊚± )

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!