24.04.2014 Views

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

128 SHINICHI MOCHIZUKI<br />

—whichiswell-defined up to multiplication by ±1 andcompatible, relativetothe<br />

natural bijection to “LabCusp(−)” <strong>of</strong> the preceding display, with the natural bijection<br />

<strong>of</strong> the second display <strong>of</strong> Proposition 4.2. That is to say, in the terminology <strong>of</strong><br />

(i), LabCusp ± ( † D v ) is equipped with a natural F ± l -group structure. ThisF± l -group<br />

structure determines a natural surjection<br />

Aut( † D v ) ↠ {±1}<br />

— i.e., by considering the induced automorphism <strong>of</strong> LabCusp ± ( † D v ). Write<br />

Aut + ( † D v ) ⊆ Aut( † D v )<br />

for the index two subgroup <strong>of</strong> “positive automorphisms” [i.e., the kernel <strong>of</strong> the above<br />

surjection] and Aut − ( † D v ) def<br />

= Aut( † D v ) \ Aut + ( † D v ) [i.e., where “\” denotes the<br />

set-theoretic complement] for the subset <strong>of</strong> “negative automorphisms”. In a similar<br />

vein, we shall write<br />

Aut + ( † D) ⊆ Aut( † D)<br />

for the subgroup <strong>of</strong> “positive automorphisms” [i.e., automorphisms each <strong>of</strong> whose<br />

components, for v ∈ V, ispositive], and, if α ∈{±1} V [i.e., where we write {±1} V<br />

for the set <strong>of</strong> set-theoretic maps from V to {±1}],<br />

Aut α ( † D) ⊆ Aut( † D)<br />

for the subset <strong>of</strong> “α-signed automorphisms” [i.e., automorphisms each <strong>of</strong> whose<br />

components, for v ∈ V, ispositive if α(v) = +1 and negative if α(v) =−1].<br />

(iv) Suppose that we are in the situation <strong>of</strong> (ii). Let<br />

‡ D = { ‡ D v } v∈V<br />

be another D-prime-strip [relative to the given initial Θ-data]. Then for any v ∈ V,<br />

we shall refer to as a +-full poly-isomorphism † ∼<br />

D v → ‡ D v any poly-isomorphism<br />

obtained as the Aut + ( † D v )- [or, equivalently, Aut + ( ‡ D v )-] orbit <strong>of</strong> an isomorphism<br />

† ∼<br />

D v → ‡ D v . In particular, if † D = ‡ D, then there are precisely two +-full polyisomorphisms<br />

† ∼<br />

D v → ‡ D v , namely, the +-full poly-isomorphism determined by the<br />

identity isomorphism, which we shall refer to as positive, and the unique nonpositive<br />

+-full poly-isomorphism, which we shall refer to as negative. In a similar<br />

vein, we shall refer to as a +-full poly-isomorphism † D → ∼ ‡ D any poly-isomorphism<br />

obtained as the Aut + ( † D)- [or, equivalently, Aut + ( ‡ D)-] orbit <strong>of</strong> an isomorphism<br />

† D → ∼ ‡ D. In particular, if † D = ‡ D, then the set <strong>of</strong> +-full poly-isomorphisms<br />

† D → ∼ ‡ D is in natural bijective correspondence [cf. the discussion <strong>of</strong> (iii) above]<br />

with the set {±1} V ; we shall refer to the +-full poly-isomorphism † D → ∼ ‡ D that<br />

corresponds to α ∈ {±1} V as the α-signed +-full poly-isomorphism. Finally, a<br />

capsule-+-full poly-morphism between capsules <strong>of</strong> D-prime-strips<br />

{ † D t } t∈T<br />

∼<br />

→{ ‡ D t ′} t′ ∈T ′<br />

is defined to be a poly-morphism between two capsules <strong>of</strong> D-prime-strips determined<br />

by +-full poly-isomorphisms † ∼<br />

D t → ‡ D ι(t) [where t ∈ T ] between the constituent<br />

objects indexed by corresponding indices, relative to some injection ι : T↩→ T ′ .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!