Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
128 SHINICHI MOCHIZUKI<br />
—whichiswell-defined up to multiplication by ±1 andcompatible, relativetothe<br />
natural bijection to “LabCusp(−)” <strong>of</strong> the preceding display, with the natural bijection<br />
<strong>of</strong> the second display <strong>of</strong> Proposition 4.2. That is to say, in the terminology <strong>of</strong><br />
(i), LabCusp ± ( † D v ) is equipped with a natural F ± l -group structure. ThisF± l -group<br />
structure determines a natural surjection<br />
Aut( † D v ) ↠ {±1}<br />
— i.e., by considering the induced automorphism <strong>of</strong> LabCusp ± ( † D v ). Write<br />
Aut + ( † D v ) ⊆ Aut( † D v )<br />
for the index two subgroup <strong>of</strong> “positive automorphisms” [i.e., the kernel <strong>of</strong> the above<br />
surjection] and Aut − ( † D v ) def<br />
= Aut( † D v ) \ Aut + ( † D v ) [i.e., where “\” denotes the<br />
set-theoretic complement] for the subset <strong>of</strong> “negative automorphisms”. In a similar<br />
vein, we shall write<br />
Aut + ( † D) ⊆ Aut( † D)<br />
for the subgroup <strong>of</strong> “positive automorphisms” [i.e., automorphisms each <strong>of</strong> whose<br />
components, for v ∈ V, ispositive], and, if α ∈{±1} V [i.e., where we write {±1} V<br />
for the set <strong>of</strong> set-theoretic maps from V to {±1}],<br />
Aut α ( † D) ⊆ Aut( † D)<br />
for the subset <strong>of</strong> “α-signed automorphisms” [i.e., automorphisms each <strong>of</strong> whose<br />
components, for v ∈ V, ispositive if α(v) = +1 and negative if α(v) =−1].<br />
(iv) Suppose that we are in the situation <strong>of</strong> (ii). Let<br />
‡ D = { ‡ D v } v∈V<br />
be another D-prime-strip [relative to the given initial Θ-data]. Then for any v ∈ V,<br />
we shall refer to as a +-full poly-isomorphism † ∼<br />
D v → ‡ D v any poly-isomorphism<br />
obtained as the Aut + ( † D v )- [or, equivalently, Aut + ( ‡ D v )-] orbit <strong>of</strong> an isomorphism<br />
† ∼<br />
D v → ‡ D v . In particular, if † D = ‡ D, then there are precisely two +-full polyisomorphisms<br />
† ∼<br />
D v → ‡ D v , namely, the +-full poly-isomorphism determined by the<br />
identity isomorphism, which we shall refer to as positive, and the unique nonpositive<br />
+-full poly-isomorphism, which we shall refer to as negative. In a similar<br />
vein, we shall refer to as a +-full poly-isomorphism † D → ∼ ‡ D any poly-isomorphism<br />
obtained as the Aut + ( † D)- [or, equivalently, Aut + ( ‡ D)-] orbit <strong>of</strong> an isomorphism<br />
† D → ∼ ‡ D. In particular, if † D = ‡ D, then the set <strong>of</strong> +-full poly-isomorphisms<br />
† D → ∼ ‡ D is in natural bijective correspondence [cf. the discussion <strong>of</strong> (iii) above]<br />
with the set {±1} V ; we shall refer to the +-full poly-isomorphism † D → ∼ ‡ D that<br />
corresponds to α ∈ {±1} V as the α-signed +-full poly-isomorphism. Finally, a<br />
capsule-+-full poly-morphism between capsules <strong>of</strong> D-prime-strips<br />
{ † D t } t∈T<br />
∼<br />
→{ ‡ D t ′} t′ ∈T ′<br />
is defined to be a poly-morphism between two capsules <strong>of</strong> D-prime-strips determined<br />
by +-full poly-isomorphisms † ∼<br />
D t → ‡ D ι(t) [where t ∈ T ] between the constituent<br />
objects indexed by corresponding indices, relative to some injection ι : T↩→ T ′ .