24.04.2014 Views

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

126 SHINICHI MOCHIZUKI<br />

Section 6: Additive Combinatorial Teichmüller <strong>Theory</strong><br />

In the present §6, we discuss the additive analogue — i.e., which revolves<br />

around the “functorial dynamics” that arise from labels<br />

∈ F l<br />

—<strong>of</strong>the“multiplicative combinatorial Teichmüller theory” developed in §4 for<br />

labels ∈ F l<br />

. These considerations lead naturally to certain enhancements <strong>of</strong> the<br />

various <strong>Hodge</strong> theaters considered in §5. On the other hand, despite the resemblance<br />

<strong>of</strong> the theory <strong>of</strong> the present §6 tothetheory<strong>of</strong>§4, §5, the theory <strong>of</strong> the present<br />

§6 is, in certain respects — especially those respects that form the analogue <strong>of</strong> the<br />

theory <strong>of</strong> §5 — substantially technically simpler.<br />

In the following, we fix a collection <strong>of</strong> initial Θ-data<br />

(F/F, X F , l, C K , V, V bad<br />

mod, ɛ)<br />

as in Definition 3.1; also, we shall use the various notations introduced in Definition<br />

3.1 for various objects associated to this initial Θ-data.<br />

Definition 6.1.<br />

(i) We shall write<br />

F ⋊±<br />

l<br />

def<br />

= F l ⋊ {±1}<br />

for the group determined by forming the semi-direct product with respect to the<br />

natural inclusion {±1} ↩→ F × l<br />

and refer to an element <strong>of</strong> F ⋊±<br />

l<br />

that maps to +1<br />

(respectively, −1) via the natural surjection F ⋊±<br />

l<br />

↠ {±1} as positive (respectively,<br />

negative). We shall refer to as an F ± l<br />

-group any set E equipped with a {±1}-orbit<br />

<strong>of</strong> bijections E → ∼ F l . Thus, any F ± l -group E is equipped with a natural F l-module<br />

structure. We shall refer to as an F ± l<br />

-torsor any set T equipped with an F⋊±<br />

l<br />

-orbit<br />

<strong>of</strong> bijections T → ∼ F l [relative to the action <strong>of</strong> F ⋊±<br />

l<br />

on F l by automorphisms <strong>of</strong><br />

the form F l ∋ z ↦→ ±z + λ ∈ F l ,forλ ∈ F l ]. Thus, if T is an F ± l<br />

-torsor, then the<br />

abelian group <strong>of</strong> automorphisms <strong>of</strong> the underlying set <strong>of</strong> F l given by the translations<br />

F l ∋ z ↦→ z + λ ∈ F l ,forλ ∈ F l , determines an abelian group<br />

Aut + (T )<br />

<strong>of</strong> “positive automorphisms” <strong>of</strong> the underlying set <strong>of</strong> T . Moreover, Aut + (T )is<br />

equipped with a natural structure <strong>of</strong> F ± l<br />

-group [such that the abelian group structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> Aut + (T ) coincides with the F l -module structure <strong>of</strong> Aut + (T ) induced by this<br />

F ± l -group structure]. Finally, if T is an F± l<br />

-torsor, then we shall write<br />

Aut ± (T )<br />

for the group <strong>of</strong> automorphisms <strong>of</strong> the underlying set <strong>of</strong> T determined [relative to<br />

the F ± l<br />

-torsor structure on T ] by the group <strong>of</strong> automorphisms <strong>of</strong> the underlying set<br />

<strong>of</strong> F l given by F ⋊±<br />

l<br />

[so Aut + (T ) ⊆ Aut ± (T ) is the unique subgroup <strong>of</strong> index 2].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!