24.04.2014 Views

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

124 SHINICHI MOCHIZUKI<br />

i =1, 2], as well as with the respective “’s”. It is immediate that any morphism<br />

<strong>of</strong> NF-bridges induces a morphism between the associated D-NF-bridges. There is<br />

an evident notion <strong>of</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> morphisms <strong>of</strong> NF-bridges.<br />

(ii) We define a Θ-bridge [relative to the given initial Θ-data] to be a collection<br />

<strong>of</strong> data<br />

( ‡ ‡ ψ Θ <br />

F J −→ ‡ F > <br />

‡ HT Θ )<br />

as follows:<br />

(a) ‡ F J = { ‡ F j } j∈J is a capsule <strong>of</strong> F-prime-strips, indexed by a finite index<br />

set J. Write ‡ D J = { ‡ D j } j∈J for the associated capsule <strong>of</strong> D-prime-strips<br />

[cf. Remark 5.2.1, (i)].<br />

(b) ‡ HT Θ is a Θ-<strong>Hodge</strong> theater.<br />

(c) ‡ F > is the F-prime-strip tautologically associated to ‡ HT Θ [cf. the<br />

discussion preceding Example 5.4]; we use the notation “” todenote<br />

this relationship between ‡ F > and ‡ HT Θ . Write ‡ D > for the D-primestrip<br />

associated to ‡ F > [cf. Remark 5.2.1, (i)].<br />

(d) ‡ ψ Θ = { ‡ ψ Θ j } j∈J is the collection <strong>of</strong> poly-morphisms ‡ ψ Θ j : ‡ F j → ‡ F ><br />

determined [i.e., as discussed in Remark 5.3.1] by a D-Θ-bridge ‡ φ Θ =<br />

{ ‡ φ Θ j : ‡ D j → ‡ D > } j∈J .<br />

Thus, one verifies immediately that any Θ-bridge as above determines an associated<br />

D-Θ-bridge ( ‡ φ Θ : ‡ D J → ‡ D > ). We define a(n) [iso]morphism <strong>of</strong> Θ-bridges<br />

( 1 1 ψ Θ <br />

F J1 −→ 1 F > <br />

to be a collection <strong>of</strong> arrows<br />

1 HT Θ ) → ( 2 2 ψ Θ <br />

F J2 −→ 2 F > <br />

2 HT Θ )<br />

1 F J1<br />

∼<br />

→ 2 F J2 ;<br />

1 F ><br />

∼<br />

→ 2 F > ;<br />

1 HT Θ ∼<br />

→ 2 HT Θ<br />

—where 1 ∼<br />

F J1 → 2 F J2 is a capsule-full poly-isomorphism [cf. §0]; 1 ∼<br />

F > → 2 F > is<br />

a full poly-isomorphism; 1 HT Θ ∼<br />

→ 2 HT Θ is an isomorphism <strong>of</strong> Θ-<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters<br />

[cf. Remark 3.6.2] — which are compatible [in the evident sense] with the i ψ Θ [for<br />

i =1, 2], as well as with the respective “’s” [cf. Corollary 5.6, (i), below]. It<br />

is immediate that any morphism <strong>of</strong> Θ-bridges induces a morphism between the<br />

associated D-Θ-bridges. There is an evident notion <strong>of</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> morphisms<br />

<strong>of</strong> Θ-bridges.<br />

(iii) We define a ΘNF-<strong>Hodge</strong> theater [relative to the given initial Θ-data] to be<br />

a collection <strong>of</strong> data<br />

‡ HT ΘNF =( ‡ F ⊛ <br />

‡ F ⊚ ‡ ψ NF<br />

<br />

←− ‡ ‡ ψ Θ <br />

F J −→ ‡ F > <br />

‡ HT Θ )<br />

—wherethedata( ‡ F ⊛ ‡ F ⊚ ←− ‡ F J ) forms an NF-bridge; the data<br />

( ‡ F J −→ ‡ F > ‡ HT Θ )formsaΘ-bridge — such that the associated data<br />

{ ‡ φ NF<br />

, ‡ φ Θ } [cf. (i), (ii)] forms a D-ΘNF-<strong>Hodge</strong> theater. A(n) [iso]morphism <strong>of</strong><br />

ΘNF-<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters is defined to be a pair <strong>of</strong> morphisms between the respective

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!