Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
124 SHINICHI MOCHIZUKI<br />
i =1, 2], as well as with the respective “’s”. It is immediate that any morphism<br />
<strong>of</strong> NF-bridges induces a morphism between the associated D-NF-bridges. There is<br />
an evident notion <strong>of</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> morphisms <strong>of</strong> NF-bridges.<br />
(ii) We define a Θ-bridge [relative to the given initial Θ-data] to be a collection<br />
<strong>of</strong> data<br />
( ‡ ‡ ψ Θ <br />
F J −→ ‡ F > <br />
‡ HT Θ )<br />
as follows:<br />
(a) ‡ F J = { ‡ F j } j∈J is a capsule <strong>of</strong> F-prime-strips, indexed by a finite index<br />
set J. Write ‡ D J = { ‡ D j } j∈J for the associated capsule <strong>of</strong> D-prime-strips<br />
[cf. Remark 5.2.1, (i)].<br />
(b) ‡ HT Θ is a Θ-<strong>Hodge</strong> theater.<br />
(c) ‡ F > is the F-prime-strip tautologically associated to ‡ HT Θ [cf. the<br />
discussion preceding Example 5.4]; we use the notation “” todenote<br />
this relationship between ‡ F > and ‡ HT Θ . Write ‡ D > for the D-primestrip<br />
associated to ‡ F > [cf. Remark 5.2.1, (i)].<br />
(d) ‡ ψ Θ = { ‡ ψ Θ j } j∈J is the collection <strong>of</strong> poly-morphisms ‡ ψ Θ j : ‡ F j → ‡ F ><br />
determined [i.e., as discussed in Remark 5.3.1] by a D-Θ-bridge ‡ φ Θ =<br />
{ ‡ φ Θ j : ‡ D j → ‡ D > } j∈J .<br />
Thus, one verifies immediately that any Θ-bridge as above determines an associated<br />
D-Θ-bridge ( ‡ φ Θ : ‡ D J → ‡ D > ). We define a(n) [iso]morphism <strong>of</strong> Θ-bridges<br />
( 1 1 ψ Θ <br />
F J1 −→ 1 F > <br />
to be a collection <strong>of</strong> arrows<br />
1 HT Θ ) → ( 2 2 ψ Θ <br />
F J2 −→ 2 F > <br />
2 HT Θ )<br />
1 F J1<br />
∼<br />
→ 2 F J2 ;<br />
1 F ><br />
∼<br />
→ 2 F > ;<br />
1 HT Θ ∼<br />
→ 2 HT Θ<br />
—where 1 ∼<br />
F J1 → 2 F J2 is a capsule-full poly-isomorphism [cf. §0]; 1 ∼<br />
F > → 2 F > is<br />
a full poly-isomorphism; 1 HT Θ ∼<br />
→ 2 HT Θ is an isomorphism <strong>of</strong> Θ-<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters<br />
[cf. Remark 3.6.2] — which are compatible [in the evident sense] with the i ψ Θ [for<br />
i =1, 2], as well as with the respective “’s” [cf. Corollary 5.6, (i), below]. It<br />
is immediate that any morphism <strong>of</strong> Θ-bridges induces a morphism between the<br />
associated D-Θ-bridges. There is an evident notion <strong>of</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> morphisms<br />
<strong>of</strong> Θ-bridges.<br />
(iii) We define a ΘNF-<strong>Hodge</strong> theater [relative to the given initial Θ-data] to be<br />
a collection <strong>of</strong> data<br />
‡ HT ΘNF =( ‡ F ⊛ <br />
‡ F ⊚ ‡ ψ NF<br />
<br />
←− ‡ ‡ ψ Θ <br />
F J −→ ‡ F > <br />
‡ HT Θ )<br />
—wherethedata( ‡ F ⊛ ‡ F ⊚ ←− ‡ F J ) forms an NF-bridge; the data<br />
( ‡ F J −→ ‡ F > ‡ HT Θ )formsaΘ-bridge — such that the associated data<br />
{ ‡ φ NF<br />
, ‡ φ Θ } [cf. (i), (ii)] forms a D-ΘNF-<strong>Hodge</strong> theater. A(n) [iso]morphism <strong>of</strong><br />
ΘNF-<strong>Hodge</strong> theaters is defined to be a pair <strong>of</strong> morphisms between the respective