Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

kurims.kyoto.u.ac.jp
from kurims.kyoto.u.ac.jp More from this publisher
24.04.2014 Views

122 SHINICHI MOCHIZUKI (respectively, D-NF-bridge portion † φ NF )oftheD-ΘNF-Hodge theater † HT D-ΘNF [cf. Remark 5.1.2]. n · ◦ ... · v . .. n ′ · ◦ ... · v ′ . .. n ′′ · ◦ ... · v ′′ Fig. 5.2: Pivotal distribution Remark 5.4.2. (i) At this point, it is useful to consider the various copies of † F ⊚ mod and its realifications introduced so far from the point of view of “log-volumes”, i.e., arithmetic degrees [cf., e.g., the discussion of [FrdI], Example 6.3; [FrdI], Theorem 6.4; Remark 3.1.5 of the present paper]. That is to say, since † F ⊚ j may be thought of as a sort of “section of † F ⊚ J over † F ⊚ mod ” — i.e., a sort of “section of K over F mod” [cf. the discussion of prime-strips in Remark 4.3.1] — one way to think of log-volumes of † F ⊚ 〈J〉 is as quantities that differ by a factor of l — i.e., corresponding, to the cardinality of J → ∼ F l — from log-volumes of † F ⊚ j . Put another way, this amounts to thinking of arithmetic degrees that appear in the various factors of † F ⊚ J as being averaged over the elements of J and hence of arithmetic degrees that appear in † F ⊚ 〈J〉 as the “resulting averages”. This sort of averaging may be thought of as a sort of abstract, Frobenioid-theoretic analogue of the normalization of arithmetic degrees that is often used in the theory of heights [cf., e.g., [GenEll], Definition 1.2, (i)] that allows one to work with heights in such a way that the height of a point remains invariant with respect to change of the base field. (ii) On the other hand, to work with the various isomorphisms of Frobenioids —suchas † F ⊚ ∼ j → † F ⊚ 〈J〉 — involved amounts [since the arithmetic degree is an intrinsic invariant of the Frobenioids involved — cf. [FrdI], Theorem 6.4, (iv); Remark 3.1.5 of the present paper] to thinking of arithmetic degrees that appear in the various factors of † F ⊚ J as being summed [i.e., without dividing by a factor of l ] over the elements of J and hence of arithmetic degrees that appear in † F ⊚ 〈J〉 as the “resulting sums”.

INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY I 123 This point of view may be thought of as a sort of abstract, Frobenioid-theoretic analogue of the normalization of arithmetic degrees or heights in which the height of a point is multiplied by the degree of the field extension when one executes a change of the base field. The notions defined in the following “Frobenioid-theoretic lifting” of Definition 4.6 will play a central role in the theory of the present series of papers. Definition 5.5. (i) We define an NF-bridge [relative to the given initial Θ-data] to be a collection of data ( ‡ ‡ ψ NF F J −→ ‡ F ⊚ ‡ F ⊛ ) as follows: (a) ‡ F J = { ‡ F j } j∈J is a capsule of F-prime-strips, indexed by a finite index set J. Write ‡ D J = { ‡ D j } j∈J for the associated capsule of D-prime-strips [cf. Remark 5.2.1, (i)]. (b) ‡ F ⊚ , ‡ F ⊛ are categories equivalent to the categories † F ⊚ , † F ⊛ , respectively, of Example 5.1, (iii). Thus, each of ‡ F ⊚ , ‡ F ⊛ is equipped with a natural Frobenioid structure [cf. [FrdI], Corollary 4.11; [FrdI], Theorem 6.4, (i); Remark 3.1.5 of the present paper]; write ‡ D ⊚ , ‡ D ⊛ for the respective base categories of these Frobenioids. (c) The arrow “” consists of the datum of a morphism ‡ D ⊚ → ‡ D ⊛ which is abstractly equivalent [cf. §0] to the natural morphism † D ⊚ → † D ⊛ of Example 5.1, (i), together with the datum of an isomorphism ‡ F ⊚ → ∼ ‡ F ⊛ |‡ D⊚ [cf. the discussion of Example 5.1, (iii)]. (d) ‡ ψ NF is a poly-morphism that lifts [uniquely! — cf. Corollary 5.3, (i), (ii)] a poly-morphism ‡ φ NF : ‡ D J → ‡ D ⊚ such that ‡ φ NF forms a D-NF-bridge [cf. Example 5.4, (v); Remark 5.4.1]. Thus, one verifies immediately that any NF-bridge as above determines an associated D-NF-bridge ( ‡ φ NF : ‡ D J → ‡ D ⊚ ). We define a(n) [iso]morphism of NF-bridges ( 1 1 ψ NF F J1 −→ 1 F ⊚ to be a collection of arrows 1 F ⊛ ) → ( 2 2 ψ NF F J2 −→ 2 F ⊚ 2 F ⊛ ) 1 F J1 ∼ → 2 F J2 ; 1 F ⊚ ∼ → 2 F ⊚ ; 1 F ⊛ ∼ → 2 F ⊛ —where 1 F J1 ∼ → 2 F J2 is a capsule-full poly-isomorphism [cf. §0], hence induces a poly-isomorphism 1 D J1 ∼ → 2 D J2 ; 1 F ⊚ ∼ → 2 F ⊚ is a poly-isomorphism which lifts a poly-isomorphism 1 D ⊚ ∼ → 2 D ⊚ such that the pair of arrows 1 D J1 ∼ → 2 D J2 , 1 D ⊚ ∼ → 2 D ⊚ forms a morphism between the associated D-NF-bridges; 1 F ⊛ ∼ → 2 F ⊛ is an isomorphism — which are compatible [in the evident sense] with the i ψ NF [for

INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY I 123<br />

This point <strong>of</strong> view may be thought <strong>of</strong> as a sort <strong>of</strong> abstract, Frobenioid-theoretic<br />

analogue <strong>of</strong> the normalization <strong>of</strong> arithmetic degrees or heights in which the height<br />

<strong>of</strong> a point is multiplied by the degree <strong>of</strong> the field extension when one executes a<br />

change <strong>of</strong> the base field.<br />

The notions defined in the following “Frobenioid-theoretic lifting” <strong>of</strong> Definition<br />

4.6 will play a central role in the theory <strong>of</strong> the present series <strong>of</strong> papers.<br />

Definition 5.5.<br />

(i) We define an NF-bridge [relative to the given initial Θ-data] to be a collection<br />

<strong>of</strong> data<br />

( ‡ ‡ ψ NF<br />

<br />

F J −→ ‡ F ⊚ <br />

‡ F ⊛ )<br />

as follows:<br />

(a) ‡ F J = { ‡ F j } j∈J is a capsule <strong>of</strong> F-prime-strips, indexed by a finite index<br />

set J. Write ‡ D J = { ‡ D j } j∈J for the associated capsule <strong>of</strong> D-prime-strips<br />

[cf. Remark 5.2.1, (i)].<br />

(b) ‡ F ⊚ , ‡ F ⊛ are categories equivalent to the categories † F ⊚ , † F ⊛ , respectively,<br />

<strong>of</strong> Example 5.1, (iii). Thus, each <strong>of</strong> ‡ F ⊚ , ‡ F ⊛ is equipped with<br />

a natural Frobenioid structure [cf. [FrdI], Corollary 4.11; [FrdI], Theorem<br />

6.4, (i); Remark 3.1.5 <strong>of</strong> the present paper]; write ‡ D ⊚ , ‡ D ⊛ for the<br />

respective base categories <strong>of</strong> these Frobenioids.<br />

(c) The arrow “” consists <strong>of</strong> the datum <strong>of</strong> a morphism ‡ D ⊚ → ‡ D ⊛<br />

which is abstractly equivalent [cf. §0] to the natural morphism † D ⊚ →<br />

† D ⊛ <strong>of</strong> Example 5.1, (i), together with the datum <strong>of</strong> an isomorphism<br />

‡ F ⊚ → ∼ ‡ F ⊛ |‡ D⊚ [cf. the discussion <strong>of</strong> Example 5.1, (iii)].<br />

(d) ‡ ψ<br />

NF is a poly-morphism that lifts [uniquely! — cf. Corollary 5.3, (i), (ii)]<br />

a poly-morphism ‡ φ NF<br />

: ‡ D J → ‡ D ⊚ such that ‡ φ NF<br />

forms a D-NF-bridge<br />

[cf. Example 5.4, (v); Remark 5.4.1].<br />

Thus, one verifies immediately that any NF-bridge as above determines an associated<br />

D-NF-bridge ( ‡ φ NF<br />

: ‡ D J → ‡ D ⊚ ). We define a(n) [iso]morphism <strong>of</strong><br />

NF-bridges<br />

( 1 1 ψ NF<br />

<br />

F J1 −→ 1 F ⊚ <br />

to be a collection <strong>of</strong> arrows<br />

1 F ⊛ ) → ( 2 2 ψ NF<br />

<br />

F J2 −→ 2 F ⊚ <br />

2 F ⊛ )<br />

1 F J1<br />

∼<br />

→ 2 F J2 ;<br />

1 F ⊚ ∼<br />

→ 2 F ⊚ ;<br />

1 F ⊛ ∼<br />

→ 2 F ⊛<br />

—where 1 F J1<br />

∼<br />

→ 2 F J2 is a capsule-full poly-isomorphism [cf. §0], hence induces a<br />

poly-isomorphism 1 D J1<br />

∼<br />

→ 2 D J2 ; 1 F ⊚ ∼ → 2 F ⊚ is a poly-isomorphism which lifts<br />

a poly-isomorphism 1 D ⊚ ∼ → 2 D ⊚ such that the pair <strong>of</strong> arrows 1 D J1<br />

∼<br />

→ 2 D J2 ,<br />

1 D ⊚ ∼ → 2 D ⊚ forms a morphism between the associated D-NF-bridges; 1 F ⊛ ∼ → 2 F ⊛<br />

is an isomorphism — which are compatible [in the evident sense] with the i ψ NF<br />

<br />

[for

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!