Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters
122 SHINICHI MOCHIZUKI (respectively, D-NF-bridge portion † φ NF )oftheD-ΘNF-Hodge theater † HT D-ΘNF [cf. Remark 5.1.2]. n · ◦ ... · v . .. n ′ · ◦ ... · v ′ . .. n ′′ · ◦ ... · v ′′ Fig. 5.2: Pivotal distribution Remark 5.4.2. (i) At this point, it is useful to consider the various copies of † F ⊚ mod and its realifications introduced so far from the point of view of “log-volumes”, i.e., arithmetic degrees [cf., e.g., the discussion of [FrdI], Example 6.3; [FrdI], Theorem 6.4; Remark 3.1.5 of the present paper]. That is to say, since † F ⊚ j may be thought of as a sort of “section of † F ⊚ J over † F ⊚ mod ” — i.e., a sort of “section of K over F mod” [cf. the discussion of prime-strips in Remark 4.3.1] — one way to think of log-volumes of † F ⊚ 〈J〉 is as quantities that differ by a factor of l — i.e., corresponding, to the cardinality of J → ∼ F l — from log-volumes of † F ⊚ j . Put another way, this amounts to thinking of arithmetic degrees that appear in the various factors of † F ⊚ J as being averaged over the elements of J and hence of arithmetic degrees that appear in † F ⊚ 〈J〉 as the “resulting averages”. This sort of averaging may be thought of as a sort of abstract, Frobenioid-theoretic analogue of the normalization of arithmetic degrees that is often used in the theory of heights [cf., e.g., [GenEll], Definition 1.2, (i)] that allows one to work with heights in such a way that the height of a point remains invariant with respect to change of the base field. (ii) On the other hand, to work with the various isomorphisms of Frobenioids —suchas † F ⊚ ∼ j → † F ⊚ 〈J〉 — involved amounts [since the arithmetic degree is an intrinsic invariant of the Frobenioids involved — cf. [FrdI], Theorem 6.4, (iv); Remark 3.1.5 of the present paper] to thinking of arithmetic degrees that appear in the various factors of † F ⊚ J as being summed [i.e., without dividing by a factor of l ] over the elements of J and hence of arithmetic degrees that appear in † F ⊚ 〈J〉 as the “resulting sums”.
INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY I 123 This point of view may be thought of as a sort of abstract, Frobenioid-theoretic analogue of the normalization of arithmetic degrees or heights in which the height of a point is multiplied by the degree of the field extension when one executes a change of the base field. The notions defined in the following “Frobenioid-theoretic lifting” of Definition 4.6 will play a central role in the theory of the present series of papers. Definition 5.5. (i) We define an NF-bridge [relative to the given initial Θ-data] to be a collection of data ( ‡ ‡ ψ NF F J −→ ‡ F ⊚ ‡ F ⊛ ) as follows: (a) ‡ F J = { ‡ F j } j∈J is a capsule of F-prime-strips, indexed by a finite index set J. Write ‡ D J = { ‡ D j } j∈J for the associated capsule of D-prime-strips [cf. Remark 5.2.1, (i)]. (b) ‡ F ⊚ , ‡ F ⊛ are categories equivalent to the categories † F ⊚ , † F ⊛ , respectively, of Example 5.1, (iii). Thus, each of ‡ F ⊚ , ‡ F ⊛ is equipped with a natural Frobenioid structure [cf. [FrdI], Corollary 4.11; [FrdI], Theorem 6.4, (i); Remark 3.1.5 of the present paper]; write ‡ D ⊚ , ‡ D ⊛ for the respective base categories of these Frobenioids. (c) The arrow “” consists of the datum of a morphism ‡ D ⊚ → ‡ D ⊛ which is abstractly equivalent [cf. §0] to the natural morphism † D ⊚ → † D ⊛ of Example 5.1, (i), together with the datum of an isomorphism ‡ F ⊚ → ∼ ‡ F ⊛ |‡ D⊚ [cf. the discussion of Example 5.1, (iii)]. (d) ‡ ψ NF is a poly-morphism that lifts [uniquely! — cf. Corollary 5.3, (i), (ii)] a poly-morphism ‡ φ NF : ‡ D J → ‡ D ⊚ such that ‡ φ NF forms a D-NF-bridge [cf. Example 5.4, (v); Remark 5.4.1]. Thus, one verifies immediately that any NF-bridge as above determines an associated D-NF-bridge ( ‡ φ NF : ‡ D J → ‡ D ⊚ ). We define a(n) [iso]morphism of NF-bridges ( 1 1 ψ NF F J1 −→ 1 F ⊚ to be a collection of arrows 1 F ⊛ ) → ( 2 2 ψ NF F J2 −→ 2 F ⊚ 2 F ⊛ ) 1 F J1 ∼ → 2 F J2 ; 1 F ⊚ ∼ → 2 F ⊚ ; 1 F ⊛ ∼ → 2 F ⊛ —where 1 F J1 ∼ → 2 F J2 is a capsule-full poly-isomorphism [cf. §0], hence induces a poly-isomorphism 1 D J1 ∼ → 2 D J2 ; 1 F ⊚ ∼ → 2 F ⊚ is a poly-isomorphism which lifts a poly-isomorphism 1 D ⊚ ∼ → 2 D ⊚ such that the pair of arrows 1 D J1 ∼ → 2 D J2 , 1 D ⊚ ∼ → 2 D ⊚ forms a morphism between the associated D-NF-bridges; 1 F ⊛ ∼ → 2 F ⊛ is an isomorphism — which are compatible [in the evident sense] with the i ψ NF [for
- Page 71 and 72: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 73 and 74: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 75 and 76: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 77 and 78: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 79 and 80: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 81 and 82: completely determined by † D. INT
- Page 83 and 84: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 85 and 86: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 87 and 88: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 89 and 90: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 91 and 92: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 93 and 94: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 95 and 96: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 97 and 98: conjugation by which maps φ NF IN
- Page 99 and 100: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 101 and 102: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 103 and 104: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 105 and 106: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 107 and 108: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 109 and 110: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 111 and 112: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 113 and 114: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 115 and 116: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 117 and 118: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 119 and 120: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 121: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 125 and 126: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 127 and 128: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 129 and 130: (v) Write INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜL
- Page 131 and 132: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 133 and 134: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 135 and 136: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 137 and 138: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 139 and 140: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 141 and 142: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 143 and 144: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 145 and 146: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 147 and 148: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 149 and 150: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 151 and 152: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 153 and 154: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 155 and 156: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
- Page 157: INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY
INTER-UNIVERSAL TEICHMÜLLER THEORY I 123<br />
This point <strong>of</strong> view may be thought <strong>of</strong> as a sort <strong>of</strong> abstract, Frobenioid-theoretic<br />
analogue <strong>of</strong> the normalization <strong>of</strong> arithmetic degrees or heights in which the height<br />
<strong>of</strong> a point is multiplied by the degree <strong>of</strong> the field extension when one executes a<br />
change <strong>of</strong> the base field.<br />
The notions defined in the following “Frobenioid-theoretic lifting” <strong>of</strong> Definition<br />
4.6 will play a central role in the theory <strong>of</strong> the present series <strong>of</strong> papers.<br />
Definition 5.5.<br />
(i) We define an NF-bridge [relative to the given initial Θ-data] to be a collection<br />
<strong>of</strong> data<br />
( ‡ ‡ ψ NF<br />
<br />
F J −→ ‡ F ⊚ <br />
‡ F ⊛ )<br />
as follows:<br />
(a) ‡ F J = { ‡ F j } j∈J is a capsule <strong>of</strong> F-prime-strips, indexed by a finite index<br />
set J. Write ‡ D J = { ‡ D j } j∈J for the associated capsule <strong>of</strong> D-prime-strips<br />
[cf. Remark 5.2.1, (i)].<br />
(b) ‡ F ⊚ , ‡ F ⊛ are categories equivalent to the categories † F ⊚ , † F ⊛ , respectively,<br />
<strong>of</strong> Example 5.1, (iii). Thus, each <strong>of</strong> ‡ F ⊚ , ‡ F ⊛ is equipped with<br />
a natural Frobenioid structure [cf. [FrdI], Corollary 4.11; [FrdI], Theorem<br />
6.4, (i); Remark 3.1.5 <strong>of</strong> the present paper]; write ‡ D ⊚ , ‡ D ⊛ for the<br />
respective base categories <strong>of</strong> these Frobenioids.<br />
(c) The arrow “” consists <strong>of</strong> the datum <strong>of</strong> a morphism ‡ D ⊚ → ‡ D ⊛<br />
which is abstractly equivalent [cf. §0] to the natural morphism † D ⊚ →<br />
† D ⊛ <strong>of</strong> Example 5.1, (i), together with the datum <strong>of</strong> an isomorphism<br />
‡ F ⊚ → ∼ ‡ F ⊛ |‡ D⊚ [cf. the discussion <strong>of</strong> Example 5.1, (iii)].<br />
(d) ‡ ψ<br />
NF is a poly-morphism that lifts [uniquely! — cf. Corollary 5.3, (i), (ii)]<br />
a poly-morphism ‡ φ NF<br />
: ‡ D J → ‡ D ⊚ such that ‡ φ NF<br />
forms a D-NF-bridge<br />
[cf. Example 5.4, (v); Remark 5.4.1].<br />
Thus, one verifies immediately that any NF-bridge as above determines an associated<br />
D-NF-bridge ( ‡ φ NF<br />
: ‡ D J → ‡ D ⊚ ). We define a(n) [iso]morphism <strong>of</strong><br />
NF-bridges<br />
( 1 1 ψ NF<br />
<br />
F J1 −→ 1 F ⊚ <br />
to be a collection <strong>of</strong> arrows<br />
1 F ⊛ ) → ( 2 2 ψ NF<br />
<br />
F J2 −→ 2 F ⊚ <br />
2 F ⊛ )<br />
1 F J1<br />
∼<br />
→ 2 F J2 ;<br />
1 F ⊚ ∼<br />
→ 2 F ⊚ ;<br />
1 F ⊛ ∼<br />
→ 2 F ⊛<br />
—where 1 F J1<br />
∼<br />
→ 2 F J2 is a capsule-full poly-isomorphism [cf. §0], hence induces a<br />
poly-isomorphism 1 D J1<br />
∼<br />
→ 2 D J2 ; 1 F ⊚ ∼ → 2 F ⊚ is a poly-isomorphism which lifts<br />
a poly-isomorphism 1 D ⊚ ∼ → 2 D ⊚ such that the pair <strong>of</strong> arrows 1 D J1<br />
∼<br />
→ 2 D J2 ,<br />
1 D ⊚ ∼ → 2 D ⊚ forms a morphism between the associated D-NF-bridges; 1 F ⊛ ∼ → 2 F ⊛<br />
is an isomorphism — which are compatible [in the evident sense] with the i ψ NF<br />
<br />
[for