24.04.2014 Views

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

Inter-universal Teichmuller Theory I: Construction of Hodge Theaters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

122 SHINICHI MOCHIZUKI<br />

(respectively, D-NF-bridge portion † φ NF<br />

)<strong>of</strong>theD-ΘNF-<strong>Hodge</strong> theater † HT D-ΘNF<br />

[cf. Remark 5.1.2].<br />

n ·<br />

◦ ...<br />

· v<br />

. ..<br />

n ′ · ◦ ... · v ′ . ..<br />

n ′′ · ◦ ... · v ′′<br />

Fig. 5.2: Pivotal distribution<br />

Remark 5.4.2.<br />

(i) At this point, it is useful to consider the various copies <strong>of</strong> † F ⊚ mod<br />

and its realifications<br />

introduced so far from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> “log-volumes”, i.e., arithmetic<br />

degrees [cf., e.g., the discussion <strong>of</strong> [FrdI], Example 6.3; [FrdI], Theorem 6.4;<br />

Remark 3.1.5 <strong>of</strong> the present paper]. That is to say, since † F ⊚ j may be thought <strong>of</strong> as<br />

a sort <strong>of</strong> “section <strong>of</strong> † F ⊚ J<br />

over † F ⊚ mod ” — i.e., a sort <strong>of</strong> “section <strong>of</strong> K over F mod” [cf.<br />

the discussion <strong>of</strong> prime-strips in Remark 4.3.1] — one way to think <strong>of</strong> log-volumes<br />

<strong>of</strong> † F ⊚ 〈J〉 is as quantities that differ by a factor <strong>of</strong> l — i.e., corresponding, to the<br />

cardinality <strong>of</strong> J → ∼ F l<br />

— from log-volumes <strong>of</strong> † F ⊚ j . Put another way, this amounts<br />

to thinking <strong>of</strong> arithmetic degrees that appear in the various factors <strong>of</strong> † F ⊚ J<br />

as being<br />

averaged over the elements <strong>of</strong> J and hence <strong>of</strong> arithmetic degrees that<br />

appear in † F ⊚ 〈J〉<br />

as the “resulting averages”.<br />

This sort <strong>of</strong> averaging may be thought <strong>of</strong> as a sort <strong>of</strong> abstract, Frobenioid-theoretic<br />

analogue <strong>of</strong> the normalization <strong>of</strong> arithmetic degrees that is <strong>of</strong>ten used in the theory<br />

<strong>of</strong> heights [cf., e.g., [GenEll], Definition 1.2, (i)] that allows one to work with heights<br />

in such a way that the height <strong>of</strong> a point remains invariant with respect to change<br />

<strong>of</strong> the base field.<br />

(ii) On the other hand, to work with the various isomorphisms <strong>of</strong> Frobenioids<br />

—suchas † F ⊚ ∼<br />

j → † F ⊚ 〈J〉<br />

— involved amounts [since the arithmetic degree is an<br />

intrinsic invariant <strong>of</strong> the Frobenioids involved — cf. [FrdI], Theorem 6.4, (iv);<br />

Remark 3.1.5 <strong>of</strong> the present paper] to thinking <strong>of</strong> arithmetic degrees that appear<br />

in the various factors <strong>of</strong> † F ⊚ J<br />

as being<br />

summed [i.e., without dividing by a factor <strong>of</strong> l ] over the elements <strong>of</strong> J<br />

and hence <strong>of</strong> arithmetic degrees that appear in † F ⊚ 〈J〉<br />

as the “resulting<br />

sums”.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!