24.04.2014 Views

clifford_a-_pickover_surfing_through_hyperspacebookfi-org

clifford_a-_pickover_surfing_through_hyperspacebookfi-org

clifford_a-_pickover_surfing_through_hyperspacebookfi-org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

DEGREES OF FREEDOM<br />

-9<br />

1800s. However, the philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724—1804) considered<br />

some of the spiritual aspects of a fourth dimension:<br />

A science of all these possible kinds of space would undoubtedly be<br />

the highest enterprise which a finite understanding could undertake<br />

in the field of geometry. ... If it is possible that there could be<br />

regions with other dimensions, it is very likely that a God had<br />

somewhere brought them into being. Such higher spaces would not<br />

belong to our world, but form separate worlds.<br />

Euclid (c. 300 B.C.), a prominent mathematician of Greco-Roman antiquity,<br />

understood that a point has no dimension at all. A line has one dimension:<br />

length. A plane had two dimensions. A solid had three dimensions. But<br />

there he stopped—believing nothing could have four dimensions. The Greek<br />

philosopher Aristotle (384—322 B.C.) echoed these beliefs in On Heaven:<br />

The line has magnitude in one way, the plane in two ways, and the<br />

solid in three ways, and beyond these there is no other magnitude<br />

because the three are all.<br />

Aristotle used the argument of perpendiculars to prove the impossibility of a<br />

fourth dimension. First he drew three mutually perpendicular lines, such as<br />

you might see in the corner of a cube. He then put forth the challenge to his<br />

colleagues to draw a fourth line perpendicular to the first three. Since there was<br />

no way to make four mutually perpendicular lines, he reasoned that the fourth<br />

dimension is impossible.<br />

It seems that the idea of a fourth dimension sometimes made philosophers<br />

and mathematicians a little nervous. John Wallis (1616—1703)—the most<br />

famous English mathematician before Isaac Newton and best known for his<br />

contributions to calculus's origin—called the fourth dimension a "monster in<br />

nature, less possible than a Chimera or Centaure." He wrote, "Length,<br />

Breadth, and Thickness, take up the whole of Space. Nor can fansie imagine<br />

how there should be a Fourth Local Dimension beyond these three."<br />

Similarly, <strong>through</strong>out history, mathematicians have called novel geometrical<br />

ideas "pathological" or "monstrous." Physicist Freeman Dyson recognized this<br />

for fractals, intricate structures that today have revolutionized mathematics<br />

and physics but in the past were treated with trepidation:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!