clifford_a-_pickover_surfing_through_hyperspacebookfi-org
clifford_a-_pickover_surfing_through_hyperspacebookfi-org
clifford_a-_pickover_surfing_through_hyperspacebookfi-org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
EVOLUTION OF FOUR-DIMENSIONAL BEINGS 197<br />
to the infrared or ultraviolet regions of the spectrum because this has survival value<br />
on a particular world. Creatures fulfilling some of these basic trends would be<br />
quite different from us, with various possible symmetries, and they could be as big<br />
as Tyrannosarus or as small as a mouse depending on gravity and other factors.<br />
We might expect intelligent 4-D beings to have digestive systems resembling a<br />
tube structure since we see this so commonly in our world in many different environments.<br />
For example, most Earthly animals above the level of cnidarians and<br />
flatworms have a complete digestive tract—that is, a tube with two openings: a<br />
mouth and an anus. There are obvious advantages of such a system compared to a<br />
gastrovascular cavity, the pouch-like structure with one opening found in flatworms.<br />
For example, with two openings, the food can move in one direction<br />
<strong>through</strong> the tubular system that can be divided into a series of distinct sections,<br />
each specialized for a different function. A section may be specialized for mechanical<br />
breakdown of large pieces of food, temporary storage, enzymatic digestion,<br />
absorption of the products of digestion, reabsorption of water, and storage of<br />
wastes. The tube is efficient and has great potential for evolutionary modifications<br />
in different environments and for different foods.<br />
As just alluded to, many of our earliest multicelled sea creatures were essentially<br />
tubes that could pump water. As life evolved, this basic topological theme did not<br />
change—the major structural differences involved complex <strong>org</strong>ans attached to the<br />
tube. You and I are still just tubes extending <strong>through</strong> a body bag filled with "sea water."<br />
In any given dimension, the larger the volume of an animal, the smaller, in proportion,<br />
its exposed surface area. As a consequence, larger <strong>org</strong>anisms (in which the<br />
interior cells are metabolically active) must increase the surfaces over which diffusion<br />
of oxygen and carbon dioxide can occur. These creatures probably must develop a<br />
means for transporting oxygen and carbon dioxide to and from this surface area.<br />
In higher dimensions, the fraction of volume near the surface of a bag-like form<br />
can increase dramatically compared to 3-D forms. This also implies that most of<br />
the blood vessels uniformly distributed <strong>through</strong> the bag will be close to the surface<br />
too (assuming the creatures have blood). As a result, heat dissipation and movement<br />
of nutrients and oxygen may be strongly affected by the proximity of the volume<br />
to surface. How would this affect the evolution of life? Would primitive 4-D<br />
beings evolve so that they digest on the outer surface, while other <strong>org</strong>ans, like<br />
brains and hearts (whose primary purpose is not nutrient and oxygen acquisition)<br />
are placed deep inside? The outer surface may be digestive and pulmonary, containing<br />
sense <strong>org</strong>ans and orifices for excretion and sex. Is this tendency more likely<br />
as the dimension of the space increases? 1<br />
Here is why the volume of a 4-D animal is more concentrated near the surface<br />
than in 3-D animals. Consider a Z)-dimensional sphere. The volume is