24.04.2014 Views

clifford_a-_pickover_surfing_through_hyperspacebookfi-org

clifford_a-_pickover_surfing_through_hyperspacebookfi-org

clifford_a-_pickover_surfing_through_hyperspacebookfi-org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EVOLUTION OF FOUR-DIMENSIONAL BEINGS 197<br />

to the infrared or ultraviolet regions of the spectrum because this has survival value<br />

on a particular world. Creatures fulfilling some of these basic trends would be<br />

quite different from us, with various possible symmetries, and they could be as big<br />

as Tyrannosarus or as small as a mouse depending on gravity and other factors.<br />

We might expect intelligent 4-D beings to have digestive systems resembling a<br />

tube structure since we see this so commonly in our world in many different environments.<br />

For example, most Earthly animals above the level of cnidarians and<br />

flatworms have a complete digestive tract—that is, a tube with two openings: a<br />

mouth and an anus. There are obvious advantages of such a system compared to a<br />

gastrovascular cavity, the pouch-like structure with one opening found in flatworms.<br />

For example, with two openings, the food can move in one direction<br />

<strong>through</strong> the tubular system that can be divided into a series of distinct sections,<br />

each specialized for a different function. A section may be specialized for mechanical<br />

breakdown of large pieces of food, temporary storage, enzymatic digestion,<br />

absorption of the products of digestion, reabsorption of water, and storage of<br />

wastes. The tube is efficient and has great potential for evolutionary modifications<br />

in different environments and for different foods.<br />

As just alluded to, many of our earliest multicelled sea creatures were essentially<br />

tubes that could pump water. As life evolved, this basic topological theme did not<br />

change—the major structural differences involved complex <strong>org</strong>ans attached to the<br />

tube. You and I are still just tubes extending <strong>through</strong> a body bag filled with "sea water."<br />

In any given dimension, the larger the volume of an animal, the smaller, in proportion,<br />

its exposed surface area. As a consequence, larger <strong>org</strong>anisms (in which the<br />

interior cells are metabolically active) must increase the surfaces over which diffusion<br />

of oxygen and carbon dioxide can occur. These creatures probably must develop a<br />

means for transporting oxygen and carbon dioxide to and from this surface area.<br />

In higher dimensions, the fraction of volume near the surface of a bag-like form<br />

can increase dramatically compared to 3-D forms. This also implies that most of<br />

the blood vessels uniformly distributed <strong>through</strong> the bag will be close to the surface<br />

too (assuming the creatures have blood). As a result, heat dissipation and movement<br />

of nutrients and oxygen may be strongly affected by the proximity of the volume<br />

to surface. How would this affect the evolution of life? Would primitive 4-D<br />

beings evolve so that they digest on the outer surface, while other <strong>org</strong>ans, like<br />

brains and hearts (whose primary purpose is not nutrient and oxygen acquisition)<br />

are placed deep inside? The outer surface may be digestive and pulmonary, containing<br />

sense <strong>org</strong>ans and orifices for excretion and sex. Is this tendency more likely<br />

as the dimension of the space increases? 1<br />

Here is why the volume of a 4-D animal is more concentrated near the surface<br />

than in 3-D animals. Consider a Z)-dimensional sphere. The volume is

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!