20.04.2014 Views

design space pruning heuristics and global optimization method for ...

design space pruning heuristics and global optimization method for ...

design space pruning heuristics and global optimization method for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the sample problem reduces the number of asteroid sequences from 3072 to 512. This<br />

eliminates only two asteroid sequences with feasible solutions, both <strong>for</strong> the following<br />

order: Earth – Group 4 – Group 1 – Group 2/3. The maximum final mass <strong>for</strong> each of<br />

these two sequences, however, is only 608 kg <strong>and</strong> 524 kg, which ranks these solutions<br />

59 th <strong>and</strong> 105 th out of the now 117 feasible asteroid sequences.<br />

The next metric considered is the change in inclination between the orbits of two<br />

asteroids. Figure 20 plots the maximum final mass <strong>for</strong> each leg-by-leg asteroid pair, over<br />

the date range considered, as a function of the absolute value of the inclination change<br />

between the starting <strong>and</strong> ending body (no differences were found in the results if a<br />

distinction was made between positive <strong>and</strong> negative inclination changes). As will be true<br />

<strong>for</strong> all similar plots presented, only asteroid pairs that were actually analyzed are plotted.<br />

For example, four of the eight Group 4 asteroids yielded no feasible Leg 1 trajectories,<br />

<strong>and</strong> were there<strong>for</strong>e not considered in analyzing subsequent Leg 2 <strong>and</strong> Leg 3 trajectories.<br />

For Leg 1, because there were only eight possible pairs, additional Group 4 asteroids<br />

were r<strong>and</strong>omly selected <strong>and</strong> analyzed in order to add more data points. Furthermore, any<br />

asteroid sequences that resulted in a maximum final mass of less than 500 kg were<br />

deemed infeasible <strong>and</strong> appear as 0 kg in the plots.<br />

Maximum Final Mass (kg)<br />

1500<br />

Leg 1<br />

1250<br />

Leg 1 (added)<br />

1000<br />

750<br />

500<br />

250<br />

0<br />

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00<br />

Inclination Change (deg)<br />

Maximum Final Mass (kg)<br />

1200<br />

Leg 2<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00<br />

Inclination Change (deg)<br />

Maximum Final Mass (kg)<br />

1000<br />

900<br />

Leg 3<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

0 10 20 30 40<br />

Inclination Change (deg)<br />

Figure 20: Maximum final mass <strong>for</strong> each asteroid sequence as a function of inclination change.<br />

For Leg 1 <strong>and</strong> Leg 2, there is a perceptible correlation between final mass <strong>and</strong><br />

inclination change, where smaller values of inclination change result in larger values of<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!