efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water
efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water
Chromium in food and drinking water 246 mg Cr(III)/kg b.w. per day) and were sacrificed after 18 or 42 hours. Cr(III) picolinate did not induce chromosomal aberrations in the bone marrow cells (Komorowski et al., 2008). Table 14: In vivo genotoxicity assay with Cr(III) compounds administered by oral route. Test system/ Endpoint Rat (F344/N) Micronuclei in bone marrow erythrocytes Mouse (B6C3F1) Micronuclei in peripheral blood erythrocytes Mouse (BDF1) Micronuclei in Bone marrow and peripheral blood cells Compound Cr picolinate Cr picolinate monohydrate Chromic potassium sulphate dodecahydrate CrK(SO 4 ) 2 x12H 2 O Cr picolinate Response (a) Dose: mg Cr(III)/kg b.w. per day (b) Negative 310.7 Negative - 1419 Negative 165 NTP (2010) NTP (2010) Reference De Flora et al. (2006) Rats (Sprague–Dawley) Micronuclei in bone marrow cells Negative 246 Mouse (C57BL/6J) Cr(III) chloride salt Positive DNA deletions (pun reversion assay) in 375 developing embryos (a): The lowest effective dose is indicated for positive results and the highest dose tested for negative results. (b): Doses calculated using data from the original publications. Komorowski et al. (2008) Kirpnick-Sobol et al. (2006) Genotoxicity studies in humans A number of biomonitoring studies have been conducted to investigate genetic damage in lymphocytes of tannery workers exposed to Cr(III) compounds but their interpretation is difficult due to the presence of other chemicals (possibly also Cr(VI)) in the work environment. No significant differences in the frequency of chromosomal aberrations in peripheral lymphocytes were detected between healthy Cr-exposed workers at a tanning plant near Baghdad city and controls matched for age, period of service and social background (Hamamy et al., 1987). However, the average concentrations of Cr in plasma and urine of exposed workers were not different from those of unexposed workers. An increase in chromosomal aberrations (Sbrana et al., 1990) but not in micronuclei (Migliore et al., 1991) was reported in lymphocytes of tannery workers of a drum workshop with elevated exposures to Cr(III) compounds (and carcinogenic aromatic amine dyes). Another study (González Cid et al., 1991) reported elevated frequency of chromosomal aberrations in the exposed tannery workers but not statistically different from the frequency seen in the controls. In this study the urinary Cr concentrations did not differ between the exposed and control workers. Medeiros et al. (2003) reported that the frequency of micronuclei and DNA protein crosslinks were significantly higher (but < 2 fold increase) in the lymphocytes of Cr-exposed tannery workers than controls. A significant correlation was also observed between Cr concentrations in the urine and plasma and frequency of DNA protein cross-links in the lymphocytes. Zhang et al. (2008) studied DNA damage in peripheral lymphocytes from workers occupationally exposed to Cr(III) by the Comet assay. The study population was divided into three groups: (1) tannery workers highly exposed to Cr from the tanning department; (2) tannery workers with moderate Cr exposure from the finishing department; (3) control individuals without exposure to genotoxic agents. Urinary and blood Cr concentrations and the tail moments (marker of DNA breaks) of lymphocytes as measured by the Comet assay were significantly higher in the two exposed groups as compared to the control group and group 1 presented higher levels than group 2. EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3595 78
Chromium in food and drinking water 7.2.1.5. Oxidative DNA damage and cytotoxicity In vitro studies Levis et al. (1978) studied the cytotoxic effects of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) compounds in cultured hamster fibroblasts (BHK line) and human epithelial-like cells (HEp line) by measuring as end-points cell growth and nucleic acid and protein synthesis. The authors concluded that the cytotoxic effects of Cr can be attributed to the action of Cr(VI) at the plasma membrane level on the mechanisms involved in nucleoside uptake, and to the interaction of Cr(III) at the intracellular level with nucleophilic targets on the DNA molecule. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and DNA fragmentation were measured in murine macrophage cells following exposure to Cr picolinate and Cr polynicotinate. The induction of oxidative damage was attributed to the picolinate moiety (Olin et al., 1994). Oxidative damage was measured in cultured macrophage cells (J774A.1) following exposure to Cr(III) picolinate and Cr nicotinate (Bagchi et al., 1997). Small dose-dependent increases in lipid peroxidation, superoxide anion and hydroxyl radical production and DNA fragmentation were observed with both Cr salts, compared to control, with greater increases in the case of Cr(III) picolinate in comparison to Cr nicotinate. Speetjens et al. (1999) reported that in the presence of reductants (ascorbate) and air, Cr(III) picolinate is capable of generating hydroxyl radicals which in turn can cleave supercoiled plasmid DNA. A mechanism is proposed where Cr(III) picolinate is reduced by biological reductants to Cr(II)- containing species that are susceptible to air oxidation, thus resulting in the catalytic generation of hydroxyl radical. They also reported that in the absence of reductants, hydrogen peroxide can interact with Cr(III) picolinate to produce hydroxyl radicals by a second, less efficient mechanism. Human HaCaT keratinocytes were exposed for 24 hrs to Cr(III) complexes and oxidized bases were measured as 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (Hininger et al., 2007). Concentrations of Cr(III) chloride, Cr(III) histidinate and Cr(III) picolinate that did not result in cytotoxic effects did not produce oxidative DNA damage. Cell exposure at LD 50 concentrations (as determined by the MTT test) led to a significant increase in oxidized bases with Cr(III) chloride but not with Cr(III) histidinate. Jana et al. (2009) studied the effect of Cr(III) picolinate uptake in peripheral blood lymphocytes by measuring cytotoxicity and markers of apoptosis. Concentrations of Cr(III) picolinate varying from 5 to 100 μM for different exposure times were tested. The results indicated that Cr(III) picolinate induces apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner. The involvement of ROS in this phenomenon is strongly suggested by the inhibition of apoptosis following pretreatment of the cells with the antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine and by the induction of markers of apoptosis including cytosolic cytochrome c release that indicate mytocondrial alterations. In vivo studies Cupo and Wetherhahn (1985) measured the binding of either sodium dichromate or Cr(III) chloride to DNA in vivo in rat liver and kidney. Cr was found bound to DNA, nuclear proteins, and RNA protein fraction in liver and kidney tissues, following an i.p. injection of either sodium dichromate or Cr(III) chloride. At early times, there was much less Cr binding to chromatin and DNA after Cr(III) treatment than after Cr(VI) treatment. In addition, after Cr(III) treatment, a large percentage of the Cr bound to chromatin was associated with protein rather than with the DNA. However, 40 hr after injection there was no significant difference in the level of Cr binding to DNA after either Cr(VI) or Cr(III) treatment. In spite of the binding, at this time, DNA damage was found in the kidney only after Cr(VI) but not Cr(III) treatment, suggesting that while Cr(III) was bioavailable it was not particularly bioactive. The ability of some Cr(III) complexes to undergo Fenton-type reactions could also contribute to their genotoxicity. The generation of oxidative damage by Cr(III) picolinate is suggested by in vivo studies EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3595 79
- Page 27 and 28: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 29 and 30: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 31 and 32: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 33 and 34: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 35 and 36: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 37 and 38: 4.2.2.1. Data collection on food (e
- Page 39 and 40: Sampling year Number of samples Chr
- Page 41 and 42: Number of analtycal results Samplin
- Page 43 and 44: 4.2.4. Occurrence data by food cate
- Page 45 and 46: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 47 and 48: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 49 and 50: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 51 and 52: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 53 and 54: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 55 and 56: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 57 and 58: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 59 and 60: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 61 and 62: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 63 and 64: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 65 and 66: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 67 and 68: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 69 and 70: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 71 and 72: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 73 and 74: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 75 and 76: 7.2.1.4. Genotoxicity Chromium in f
- Page 77: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 81 and 82: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 83 and 84: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 85 and 86: 7.2.2.3. Developmental and reproduc
- Page 87 and 88: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 89 and 90: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 91 and 92: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 93 and 94: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 95 and 96: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 97 and 98: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 99 and 100: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 101 and 102: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 103 and 104: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 105 and 106: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 107 and 108: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 109 and 110: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 111 and 112: 7.5. Dose-response assessment Chrom
- Page 113 and 114: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 115 and 116: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 117 and 118: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 119 and 120: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 121 and 122: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 123 and 124: Chromium in food and drinking water
- Page 125 and 126: Human observations Chromium in food
- Page 127 and 128: Chromium in food and drinking water
Chromium in <strong>food</strong> and <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong><br />
7.2.1.5. Oxidative DNA damage and cytotoxicity<br />
In vitro studies<br />
Levis et al. (1978) studied the cytotoxic effects of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) compounds in cultured hamster<br />
fibroblasts (BHK line) and human epithelial-like cells (HEp line) by measuring as end-points cell<br />
growth and nucleic acid and protein synthesis. The authors concluded that the cytotoxic effects of Cr<br />
can be attributed to the action of Cr(VI) at the plasma membrane level on the mechanisms involved in<br />
nucleoside uptake, and to the interaction of Cr(III) at the intracellular level with nucleophilic targets<br />
on the DNA molecule.<br />
Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and DNA fragmentation were measured in murine macrophage cells<br />
following exposure to Cr picolinate and Cr polynicotinate. The induction of oxidative damage was<br />
attributed to the picolinate moiety (Olin et al., 1994).<br />
Oxidative damage was measured in cultured macrophage cells (J774A.1) following exposure to<br />
Cr(III) picolinate and Cr nicotinate (Bagchi et al., 1997). Small dose-dependent increases in lipid<br />
peroxidation, superoxide anion and hydroxyl radical production and DNA fragmentation were<br />
observed with both Cr salts, compared to control, with greater increases in the case of Cr(III)<br />
picolinate in comparison to Cr nicotinate.<br />
Speetjens et al. (1999) reported that in the presence of reductants (ascorbate) and air, Cr(III) picolinate<br />
is capable of generating hydroxyl radicals which in turn can cleave supercoiled plasmid DNA. A<br />
mechanism is proposed where Cr(III) picolinate is reduced by biological reductants to Cr(II)-<br />
containing species that are susceptible to air oxidation, thus resulting in the catalytic generation of<br />
hydroxyl radical. They also reported that in the absence of reductants, hydrogen peroxide can interact<br />
with Cr(III) picolinate to produce hydroxyl radicals by a second, less efficient mechanism.<br />
Human HaCaT keratinocytes were exposed for 24 hrs to Cr(III) complexes and oxidized bases were<br />
measured as 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (Hininger et al., 2007). Concentrations of Cr(III) chloride,<br />
Cr(III) histidinate and Cr(III) picolinate that did not result in cytotoxic effects did not produce<br />
oxidative DNA damage. Cell exposure at LD 50 concentrations (as determined by the MTT test) led to<br />
a significant increase in oxidized bases with Cr(III) chloride but not with Cr(III) histidinate.<br />
Jana et al. (2009) studied the effect of Cr(III) picolinate uptake in peripheral blood lymphocytes by<br />
measuring cytotoxicity and markers of apoptosis. Concentrations of Cr(III) picolinate varying from<br />
5 to 100 μM for different exposure times were tested. The results indicated that Cr(III) picolinate<br />
induces apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner. The involvement of ROS in this phenomenon is<br />
strongly suggested by the inhibition of apoptosis following pretreatment of the cells with the<br />
antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine and by the induction of markers of apoptosis including cytosolic<br />
cytochrome c release that indicate mytocondrial alterations.<br />
In vivo studies<br />
Cupo and Wetherhahn (1985) measured the binding of either sodium dichromate or Cr(III) chloride to<br />
DNA in vivo in rat liver and kidney. Cr was found bound to DNA, nuclear proteins, and RNA protein<br />
fraction in liver and kidney tissues, following an i.p. injection of either sodium dichromate or Cr(III)<br />
chloride. At early times, there was much less Cr binding to chromatin and DNA after Cr(III) treatment<br />
than after Cr(VI) treatment. In addition, after Cr(III) treatment, a large percentage of the Cr bound to<br />
chromatin was associated with protein rather than with the DNA. However, 40 hr after injection there<br />
was no significant difference in the level of Cr binding to DNA after either Cr(VI) or Cr(III)<br />
treatment. In spite of the binding, at this time, DNA damage was found in the kidney only after Cr(VI)<br />
but not Cr(III) treatment, suggesting that while Cr(III) was bioavailable it was not particularly<br />
bioactive.<br />
The ability of some Cr(III) complexes to undergo Fenton-type reactions could also contribute to their<br />
genotoxicity. The generation of oxidative damage by Cr(III) picolinate is suggested by in vivo studies<br />
EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3595 79