16.04.2014 Views

efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water

efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water

efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chromium in <strong>food</strong> and <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong><br />

of 1 L/day ( three doses of 0.33 L at 6-hour intervals). Samples of urine, plasma, and RBCs were<br />

collected and analyzed for total <strong>chromium</strong>. Upon taking the bolus dose urinary <strong>chromium</strong> excretion<br />

with an average half life of about 39 hours was observed. However, total urinary <strong>chromium</strong> excretion<br />

and peak concentrations in urine and blood varied considerably between the five volunteers. Upon the<br />

3 days exposure to repeated low dose levels generally lower <strong>chromium</strong> uptake/excretion was<br />

observed. The authors concluded, based on low or even absent levels of elevated RBC <strong>chromium</strong><br />

content in the weeks following Cr(VI) ingestion, that the Cr(VI) was reduced rapidly to Cr(III) in the<br />

upper gastrointestinal tract or plasma prior to RBC uptake and systemic distribution. Thus they<br />

concluded that volunteers ingesting highly soluble chromate (Cr(VI)) at concentrations of<br />

5 – 10 mg Cr(VI)/L in <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong> have a pattern of blood uptake and urinary excretion consistent<br />

with uptake and distribution of <strong>chromium</strong> in the trivalent state. They also concluded that the<br />

endogenous reducing agents within the upper gastrointestinal tract and the blood provided sufficient<br />

reducing potential to prevent any substantial systemic uptake of Cr(VI) following <strong>drinking</strong>-<strong>water</strong><br />

exposures at 5-10 mg Cr(VI)/L.<br />

Finley et al. (1997) reported the urinary recovery in human subjects following dose levels of 0.1, 0.5,<br />

1.0, 5.0 or 10 mg/day of Cr(VI) for four days to amount to respectively 1.7 %, 1.2 %, 1.4 %, 1.7 %<br />

and 3.5 %. A dose-related increase in urinary <strong>chromium</strong> excretion was observed in all volunteers. The<br />

authors indicated that the RBC <strong>chromium</strong> profiles suggested that the ingested Cr(VI) was reduced to<br />

Cr(III) before entering the bloodstream, since the <strong>chromium</strong> concentration in RBCs dropped rapidly<br />

post-exposure. The authors concluded that the RBC and plasma <strong>chromium</strong> profiles are consistent with<br />

systemic absorption of Cr(III) not Cr(VI).<br />

Collins et al. (2010) demonstrated that exposure of male F344/N rats and female B6C3F1 mice to<br />

Cr(VI) resulted in significantly higher tissue <strong>chromium</strong> levels compared with Cr(III) following similar<br />

oral doses. This indicates that a portion of the Cr(VI) escaped gastric reduction and was distributed<br />

systemically. Linear or supralinear dose responses of total <strong>chromium</strong> in tissues were observed<br />

following exposure to Cr(VI), indicating that these exposures did not saturate gastric reduction<br />

capacity. The study also reports that in vitro experiments demonstrated that Cr(VI) but not Cr(III), is a<br />

substrate of the sodium/sulphate cotransporter, providing a partial explanation for the greater<br />

absorption of Cr(VI).<br />

Distribution<br />

Hexavalent <strong>chromium</strong> readily penetrates cell membranes. As a result Cr(VI) is found in both RBC and<br />

plasma. When incubated with washed isolated RBCs, almost the entire Cr(VI) dose is taken up by the<br />

cells and remains there for the lifetime of the RBC. It is reduced inside the cells to Cr(III), essentially<br />

trapping it inside the RBC. Kerger et al. (1997) indicated that sustained elevations in RBC <strong>chromium</strong><br />

levels provide a specific indication of <strong>chromium</strong> absorption in the hexavalent state. However, when<br />

incubated with whole blood or RBCs plus plasma, only a fraction (depending on conditions) of the<br />

Cr(VI) is taken up by the RBC (Lewalter et al., 1985; Wiegand et al., 1985; Coogan et al., 1991a;<br />

Corbett et al., 1998). This may be due to the reduction of a portion of the administered Cr(VI) to<br />

Cr(III) outside the RBC (Korallus et al., 1984; Richelmi and Baldi, 1984; Capellmann and Bolt, 1992).<br />

Oral administration of Cr(VI) results in increased levels of <strong>chromium</strong> in a number of tissues including<br />

especially the liver, spleen, kidney and bone (marrow) (MacKenzie et al., 1958; Witmer et al., 1989;<br />

Witmer and Harris, 1991; Thomann et al., 1994; Sutherland et al., 2000; NTP, 2008). Thompson et al.<br />

(2011a, 2012b) reported significant increases in total Cr concentrations in the oral cavity, glandular<br />

stomach, duodenum, jejunum, and ileum of rats and mice following 90 days of exposure to sodium<br />

dichromate dihydrate (SDD) in <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong>.<br />

Substantial uptake of <strong>chromium</strong> by the liver is indicated by elevated levels of <strong>chromium</strong> in the bile<br />

following intravenous administration of Cr(VI), (Cikrt and Bencko, 1979; Manzo et al., 1983;<br />

Cavalleri et al., 1985).<br />

Increased concentrations of <strong>chromium</strong> in the blood, kidney and femur were detected in rats, mice and<br />

guinea pigs administered 1, 3, 10, 30, 100 or 300 mg/L of Cr(VI) as sodium dichromate in their<br />

EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3595 67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!