16.04.2014 Views

efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water

efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water

efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.2.4. Occurrence data by <strong>food</strong> category and by type of <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong><br />

Chromium in <strong>food</strong> and <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong><br />

The left-censored data were treated by the substitution method as recommended in the ‘Principles and<br />

Methods for the Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Food’ (WHO/IPCS, 2009b). The same method is<br />

indicated in the EFSA scientific report ‘Management of left-censored data in dietary exposure<br />

assessment of chemical substances’ (EFSA, 2010d) as an option in the treatment of left-censored data.<br />

The guidance suggests that the LB and UB approach should be used for chemicals likely to be present<br />

in the <strong>food</strong> (e.g. naturally occurring contaminants, nutrients and mycotoxins). At the LB, results below<br />

the LOQ and LOD were replaced by zero; at the UB the results below the LOD were replaced by the<br />

LOD and those below the LOQ were replaced by the value reported as LOQ.<br />

4.2.4.1. Occurrence data in <strong>food</strong> (excluding <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong>)<br />

As explained in Section 4.2.2.1, the reported occurrence data on <strong>food</strong> was considered as Cr(III). For<br />

those <strong>food</strong>s prepared with <strong>water</strong> before their consumption (coffee, tea infusions, and dry infant and<br />

follow-on <strong>food</strong>), the occurrence values provided for the dry <strong>food</strong>s were used either as such or with<br />

dilution factors (later described in Section 6.1) depending on how the consumption data were reported.<br />

Occurrence values provided for their corresponding prepared <strong>food</strong>s (e.g. twenty samples of tea<br />

beverage) were excluded.<br />

Table 6 shows the summary statistics of <strong>chromium</strong> concentrations in the final dataset of <strong>food</strong> samples<br />

aggregated at FoodEx Level 1. Despite the important number of left-censored data present, no big<br />

differences are observed between LB and UB values in most of the <strong>food</strong> categories. A plausible<br />

explanation is that in general sensitive methods were used, and where high LOQs were reported they<br />

were linked to quantified samples, therefore, without relevance on the UB. In addition, by applying<br />

the LOQ cut-offs described in Section 4.2.2.1, the differences between LB and UB were reduced in<br />

several <strong>food</strong> groups, such as ‘Beer and beer-like beverage’ or ‘Cereal-based <strong>food</strong> for infants and<br />

young children’.<br />

At FoodEx level 1 all the <strong>food</strong> groups were well represented, with a maximum of 4 647 samples in the<br />

<strong>food</strong> group ‘Vegetables and vegetable products (including fungi)’ and a minimum of 80 samples in the<br />

<strong>food</strong> group ‘Eggs and egg products’. Regarding the occurrence values, five <strong>food</strong> groups at FoodEx<br />

Level 1 showed the highest occurrence values: ‘Products for special nutritional use’, ‘Herbs, spices<br />

and condiments’, ‘Sugar and confectionery’, ‘Vegetables and vegetable products (including fungi)’,<br />

and ‘Animal and vegetable fats and oils’ (see Table 6). In all cases, a detailed evaluation of the<br />

occurrence data at different FoodEx levels was indispensable prior to their use to estimate the dietary<br />

exposure to <strong>chromium</strong>.<br />

The highest occurrence was reported in the <strong>food</strong> group ‘Products for special nutritional use’. In this<br />

<strong>food</strong> group, where Cr(III) is in some cases intentionally added, were reported average values of<br />

12 129 g/kg (n =2 131 LB = UB). A great heterogeneity of occurrence values was observed for the<br />

different <strong>food</strong> subgroups at lower FoodEx levels. Some of the highest values were reported for the<br />

<strong>food</strong> subgroup ‘Combination of vitamins and minerals supplements’ with a LB = 23 441 g/kg and<br />

UB = 23 514 g/kg (n = 582).<br />

The group ‘Herbs, spices and condiments’ was reported on 611 occasions, with mean concentrations<br />

of 1627 g/kg and 1665 g/kg at the LB and UB, respectively. The high concentration reported in this<br />

<strong>food</strong> group is clearly driven by the presence of four samples of ‘Cinnamon (Cinnamonum verum syn.<br />

C. zeylanicum)’, all quantified and with an average value of 84 250 g/kg. High levels of <strong>chromium</strong> in<br />

cinnamon have been described in the literature (Gul and Safdar, 2009). Other spices are also reported<br />

to contain high concentrations of <strong>chromium</strong>, such as ‘Paprika powder’ (LB = 3200 g/kg and<br />

UB = 3271 g/kg, n = 71) and ‘Pepper, black and white (Piper nigrum)’ (LB = 2609 g/kg and<br />

UB = 2611 g/kg, n = 105). High concentrations of <strong>chromium</strong> in spices and aromatic herbs have been<br />

reported by different authors (García et al., 2000; Divrikli et al., 2006; Kovacs et al., 2007; Sykula-<br />

Zajac and Pawlak, 2012).<br />

A total of 1 126 samples were reported for the <strong>food</strong> group ‘Sugar and confectionery’. Mean<br />

occurrence values were 625 g/kg and 639 g/kg at the LB and UB, respectively (Table 6). As<br />

EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3595 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!