efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water

efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water

damienvanherp
from damienvanherp More from this publisher
16.04.2014 Views

Chromium in food and drinking water percentage of conversion from Cr(III) (LOD of 0.4 µg/L) to Cr(VI) (LOD of 0.04 µg/L) increased from 5.9 % to 9.3 % with increase of the concentration of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) from 1 to 100 µg/L, while the reverse conversion from Cr(VI) to Cr(III) was observed within a range between 0.9 % and 1.9 %. The equilibrium constant for the conversion was found to be independent of the initial concentrations of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) and in the range of 1.0 (at pH 3) to 1.8 (at pH 10). 3.2.3. Analytical quality assurance: performance criteria, reference materials, validation and proficiency testing Some performance criteria (limits of detection and quantification (LOD/LOQ), method bias and recovery, measurement uncertainties and analytical quality assurance) for the determination of total chromium and chromium species content in food are laid down in the EN 13804, 2013. The LOD and LOQ will vary with the analytical technique, the sample mass, the laboratory and the food matrix. For the determination of chromium in water intended for human consumption, EU Council Directive 98/83/EC indicates that the performance characteristics for the method of analysis used must, as a minimum, be capable of measuring concentrations equal to the parametric value with a trueness, precision and limit of detection that must not exceed 10 % of the parametric value (i.e. 5 μg/L). To demonstrate the trueness (i.e. systematic error) and precision (i.e. random error) of trace element data, one of the important criteria is the reporting of correct (and precise) data for the chromium content of certified reference materials that closely match the matrix of the samples under investigation (Jorhem, 2004). Several standard or certified reference materials (SRMs and CRMs) are available for total chromium (Appendix B, Table B1). There is a current need for CRMs certified for different chromium species in water and other foodstuffs. Two fully validated, European standardised methods are available for the determination of total chromium in food by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) after pressure digestion wih a LOQ of about 0.04 to 0.16 mg/kg according to the sample weight (EN 14083:2003) or by atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS or GFAAS), but GFAAS is recommended) after ash drying (EN 14082:2003). Four standardised methods are available for the determination of total chromium in water by flame or graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS or GFAAS (EN 1233:1996 or ISO 9174:1998, EN ISO 15586: 2004), by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) (EN ISO 11885:2009) or mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (EN ISO 17294- 2:2003). Similar sensitivity can be obtained by GFAAS, ICP-OES and ICP-MS methods (LOD of 0.5 µg/L). No standardised methods are available for determination of Cr(VI) in food while two methods are suitable for various types of water and based on colorimetric reactions with 1,5-diphenylcarbazide. Namely, the continuous flow analysis (CFA) and spectrometric detection method (EN ISO 23913:2006) and the photometric method (EN ISO 18412:2006) can be applied for drinking water in the concentration range of 2 to 20 µg/L and 2 to 50 µg/L, respectively. A number of proficiency testing schemes (PTS) are regularly organised by several providers for total chromium in food and for both total chromium and Cr(VI) in water to demonstrate and maintain analytical quality assurance. However, no PTS are available for Cr(VI) in food. Between 2010 and 2012, Food Analysis Performance Assessment Scheme (FAPAS) organized several proficiency tests on the determination of total chromium in food e.g. in infant cereal (FAPAS ® reports 07183, 07165), infant formula (FAPAS ® report 07177, 07159), soft drinks (FAPAS ® report 07155) and milk powder (FAPAS ® report 07138). The results indicate that most of the participating laboratories, although applying different methods, are capable of reliably analysing total chromium (range 67-98 % satisfactory results, 42 to 60 participants) at the level of interest. Between 2012 and 2013, FAPAS organized several proficiency tests on the determination of total chromium in potable water (LEAP ® Scheme reports CHEM107, 109, 111V2 and 112). 88-95 % of 17 to 25 participants obtained satisfactory results at the level of interest (range 9.91-41.4 µg/L). EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3595 30

Chromium in food and drinking water In 2011-2012, the Bureau Interprofessionnel d'Etudes Analytiques (Bipea) organised three different proficiency tests in feed water (Bipea reports n°2010-2011 – 0415; n°2011-2012 – 0448; n°2012- 2013 – 0123). For 57 out of 65 participants, 88 to 96 % of the results for total chromium (assigned values ranging from 7.5 to 273 µg/L) and 79 to 95 % of the 38-46 results for Cr(VI) (assigned values ranging from 98 to 241 µg/L) were considered satisfactory. At low Cr(VI) concentration level, no assigned value could be given, as 38 out of 39 participants indicated results < 1 to < 50 µg/L (Bipea report n°2012-2013 – 0123). 3.3. Conclusions In summary, several analytical techniques are suitable for the determination of total chromium and chromium species in foods and waters: For total chromium, F- or GF-AAS, and increasingly ICP-MS with a collision/reaction cell technology to reduce ArC interferences have been used. Two European standardised methods for the determination of total chromium in food by GFAAS are available (EN 14082:2003; EN 14083:2003) while four standardised methods are available in water by F- or GF-AAS or ICP-(OES or MS) techniques (EN 1233:1996 or ISO 9174:1998; EN ISO 17294-2:2003; EN ISO 15586:2004; EN ISO 11885:2009). For Cr(VI), no standardised methods are available in food while two exist for water, based on colorimetric reactions with 1,5-diphenylcarbazide and spectrometric detection (EN ISO 23913:2006; EN ISO 18412:2006). For food, although the use of NaOH-Na 2 CO 3 solutions with hot plate extraction seems to be the more widespread procedure, chromium species transformation can still occur. Modern analytical techniques, such as HPLC–ICP-MS, and the use of speciated isotope dilution (SID) are a suitable tool for correction of these interconversions in both foods and waters while delivering more accurate and precise results (Ma and Tanner, 2008; Unceta et al., 2010; Novotnik et al., 2013). Several SRMs and CRMs are available for total chromium and none are also available for chromium species. There is a current need for CRMs in water and other foodstuffs certified as to chromium species. To demonstrate and maintain analytical quality assurance, regular proficiency testing schemes are available for total chromium in food and water as well as for Cr(VI) in water. However, none is available for Cr(VI) in food. 4. Occurrence of chromium in food and drinking water 4.1. Previously reported occurrence results There is a very large number of data in the literature as regards total chromium in food, and significantly less for Cr(VI). All the analytical results are reported on a wet weight basis unless otherwise specified or there is lack of information. In general, food was reported to contain chromium at (unspeciated) concentrations ranging from less than 10 µg/kg to more than 1000 µg/kg, although most fresh foods had chromium levels from a few up to tens or possibly hundreds of µg/kg (Schroeder, 1971, 1974; Anderson, 1981; Kumpulainen, 1992; OEHHA, 2011). The highest concentrations (> 100 µg/kg) were found in (roughly descending order): condiment and spices, cocoa, molasses and raw sugar, nuts, dry corn, seafood, and butter and oil. Meat, grains and cereals, starch, polished rice, vegetables, fruits, and milk and dairy products were in general seen to have lower chromium concentrations (< 100 µg/kg). Chromium content in a given food type can vary substantially: for instance, in whole cereals variations were seen to occur among different types of cereals, but also within cereals of the same type reflecting the area of origin (Plessi and Monzani, 1990). 4.1.1. Total Chromium in food Analyses of the total chromium concentrations in foods performed in 20 different countries and available from the literature (51 articles published between 1980 and 2007) have been recently EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3595 31

Chromium in <strong>food</strong> and <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong><br />

percentage of conversion from Cr(III) (LOD of 0.4 µg/L) to Cr(VI) (LOD of 0.04 µg/L) increased<br />

from 5.9 % to 9.3 % with increase of the concentration of Cr(VI) and Cr(III) from 1 to 100 µg/L,<br />

while the reverse conversion from Cr(VI) to Cr(III) was observed within a range between 0.9 % and<br />

1.9 %. The equilibrium constant for the conversion was found to be independent of the initial<br />

concentrations of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) and in the range of 1.0 (at pH 3) to 1.8 (at pH 10).<br />

3.2.3. Analytical quality assurance: performance criteria, reference materials, validation and<br />

proficiency testing<br />

Some performance criteria (limits of detection and quantification (LOD/LOQ), method bias and<br />

recovery, measurement uncertainties and analytical quality assurance) for the determination of total<br />

<strong>chromium</strong> and <strong>chromium</strong> species content in <strong>food</strong> are laid down in the EN 13804, 2013. The LOD and<br />

LOQ will vary with the analytical technique, the sample mass, the laboratory and the <strong>food</strong> matrix.<br />

For the determination of <strong>chromium</strong> in <strong>water</strong> intended for human consumption, EU Council Directive<br />

98/83/EC indicates that the performance characteristics for the method of analysis used must, as a<br />

minimum, be capable of measuring concentrations equal to the parametric value with a trueness,<br />

precision and limit of detection that must not exceed 10 % of the parametric value (i.e. 5 μg/L).<br />

To demonstrate the trueness (i.e. systematic error) and precision (i.e. random error) of trace element<br />

data, one of the important criteria is the reporting of correct (and precise) data for the <strong>chromium</strong><br />

content of certified reference materials that closely match the matrix of the samples under<br />

investigation (Jorhem, 2004). Several standard or certified reference materials (SRMs and CRMs) are<br />

available for total <strong>chromium</strong> (Appendix B, Table B1). There is a current need for CRMs certified for<br />

different <strong>chromium</strong> species in <strong>water</strong> and other <strong>food</strong>stuffs.<br />

Two fully validated, European standardised methods are available for the determination of total<br />

<strong>chromium</strong> in <strong>food</strong> by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (GFAAS) after pressure<br />

digestion wih a LOQ of about 0.04 to 0.16 mg/kg according to the sample weight (EN 14083:2003) or<br />

by atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS or GFAAS), but GFAAS is recommended) after ash drying<br />

(EN 14082:2003). Four standardised methods are available for the determination of total <strong>chromium</strong> in<br />

<strong>water</strong> by flame or graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS or GFAAS (EN 1233:1996<br />

or ISO 9174:1998, EN ISO 15586: 2004), by inductively coupled plasma optical emission<br />

spectrometry (ICP-OES) (EN ISO 11885:2009) or mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (EN ISO 17294-<br />

2:2003). Similar sensitivity can be obtained by GFAAS, ICP-OES and ICP-MS methods (LOD of<br />

0.5 µg/L).<br />

No standardised methods are available for determination of Cr(VI) in <strong>food</strong> while two methods are<br />

suitable for various types of <strong>water</strong> and based on colorimetric reactions with 1,5-diphenylcarbazide.<br />

Namely, the continuous flow analysis (CFA) and spectrometric detection method<br />

(EN ISO 23913:2006) and the photometric method (EN ISO 18412:2006) can be applied for <strong>drinking</strong><br />

<strong>water</strong> in the concentration range of 2 to 20 µg/L and 2 to 50 µg/L, respectively.<br />

A number of proficiency testing schemes (PTS) are regularly organised by several providers for total<br />

<strong>chromium</strong> in <strong>food</strong> and for both total <strong>chromium</strong> and Cr(VI) in <strong>water</strong> to demonstrate and maintain<br />

analytical quality assurance. However, no PTS are available for Cr(VI) in <strong>food</strong>.<br />

Between 2010 and 2012, Food Analysis Performance Assessment Scheme (FAPAS) organized several<br />

proficiency tests on the determination of total <strong>chromium</strong> in <strong>food</strong> e.g. in infant cereal (FAPAS ® reports<br />

07183, 07165), infant formula (FAPAS ® report 07177, 07159), soft drinks (FAPAS ® report 07155)<br />

and milk powder (FAPAS ® report 07138). The results indicate that most of the participating<br />

laboratories, although applying different methods, are capable of reliably analysing total <strong>chromium</strong><br />

(range 67-98 % satisfactory results, 42 to 60 participants) at the level of interest.<br />

Between 2012 and 2013, FAPAS organized several proficiency tests on the determination of total<br />

<strong>chromium</strong> in potable <strong>water</strong> (LEAP ® Scheme reports CHEM107, 109, 111V2 and 112). 88-95 % of<br />

17 to 25 participants obtained satisfactory results at the level of interest (range 9.91-41.4 µg/L).<br />

EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3595 30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!