16.04.2014 Views

efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water

efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water

efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chromium in <strong>food</strong> and bottled <strong>water</strong><br />

J 2.7.<br />

Acinus, cytoplasmic alteration in pancreas female mice<br />

For the dose-response analysis of the incidence of acinus,cytoplasmic alteration in pancreas female<br />

mice all non-restricted models, except the probit and logistic model showed an acceptable fit (p > 0.05)<br />

which resulted in BMDL 10 values ranging between 0.72 and 0.26 mg/kg b.w. per day.<br />

The graphs in Figure J19 show the fit of the Gamma and the Weibull model. A BMDL 10 = 0.26 mg/kg<br />

b.w. per day was used to characterize these data.<br />

Using a different modelling approach not following EFSA (2009) ADTSR reported a BMDL 10 of<br />

0.52 mg/kg b.w. per day.<br />

Table J19: Incidence of pancreas acinus cytoplasmic alteration in B6C3D1 female mice exposed to<br />

SDD in <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong> for 2 years. The benchmark dose (BMD -10 ), the 95 % benchmark dose lower<br />

confidence limit (BMDL-10) values for a BMR of 10 % extra risk with characteristics of the model fit.<br />

Data Dose 0 0.38 1.4 3.1 8.7<br />

Response 0/48 6/50 6/49 14/50 32/50<br />

Models<br />

Restriction<br />

BMD<br />

Minus<br />

10 BMDL 10<br />

N of<br />

P-<br />

(mg/kg (mg/kg<br />

Loglikelihood<br />

Accepted<br />

parameters<br />

value<br />

b.w. per b.w. per<br />

day) day)<br />

Full model na 5 99.0 – – – –<br />

Null (reduced) model na 1 134.9 - - - -<br />

Probit na 2 103.6 0.03 no 2.24 1.89<br />

LogProbit none 3 102.2 0.08 yes 0.60 0.30<br />

Logistic na 2 103.9 0.02 no 2.44 2.03<br />

LogLogistic none 3 101.6 0.14 yes 0.64 0.31<br />

Quantal-Linear /QL) na 2 101.4 0.17 yes 0.92 0.72<br />

Multistage Cancer na same as QL<br />

Multistage none 3 101.4 0.08 yes 0.89 0.57<br />

Weibull none 2 100.8 0.25 yes 0.64 0.30<br />

Gamma none 2 100.7 0.30 yes 0.61 0.26<br />

b.w.: body weight; na: not applicable; if: invalid fit.<br />

Weibull Model, with BMR of 10% Extra Risk for the BMD and 0.95 Lower Confidence Limit for the BMDL<br />

Gamma Multi-Hit Model, with BMR of 10% Extra Risk for the BMD and 0.95 Lower Confidence Limit for the BMDL<br />

0.8<br />

Weibull<br />

BMD Lower Bound<br />

1<br />

Gamma Multi-Hit<br />

BMD Lower Bound<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.8<br />

Fraction Affected<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

Fraction Affected<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

BMDL<br />

BMD<br />

BMDL BMD<br />

12:33 01/21 2014<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9<br />

dose<br />

12:10 01/21 2014<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9<br />

dose<br />

Figure J19: Fits of the Weibull model (left) and gamma model (right) to the dose-response data on<br />

acinus, cytoplasmic alteration in pancreas in female mice.<br />

EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3595 252

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!