efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water
efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water
Chromium in food and bottled water a) Result of PROAST for all models Weibull Model, with BMR of 10% Extra Risk for the BMD and 0.95 Lower Confidence Limit for the BMDL 0.3 Weibull BMD Lower Bound 0.25 Fraction Affected 0.2 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 17:41 01/20 2014 BMDL BMD 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 dose b) Result of BMDS when pooling the data of males and female for the Weibull model used to illustrate the data since the log-probit model failed to get fitted with BMDS software Figure J12: Fit of all models to the dose-response data on the incidence of squamous cell carcinoma or papilloma in oral mucosa or tongue in rats. Note that the models denoted LVM E2 and H3 are not recommended by EFSA (2009c). EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3595 242
Chromium in food and bottled water J2. BMD analysis of Chromium (VI): non-neoplastic lesions This part of the appendix informs on the details when applying the BMD approach to the incidences of the following five types of non-neoplastic lesions: • chronic inflammation of the liver in female rats; • diffuse epithelial hyperplasia in the duodenum in male and female mice; • hystiocytic cellular infiltration in mesenteric lymph nodes in male and female mice; • hystiocytic cellular infiltration in liver in female mice; • acinus,cytoplasmic alteration in pancreas. reported in Table 22. The dose-response data of the respevive endpoint are shown on top of the five tables displayed below. J.2.1. Chronic inflammation of the liver in female rats For the dose-resposne analysis of the incidence of chronic inflammation of the liver in female rats five of the non-restricted models (log-probit, log-logistic, multistage, Weibull, and Gamma) showed an acceptable fit (p > 0.05). However the BMD 10 values ranged from 0.2 to 0.001 mg/kg b.w. per day and the BMDL 10 values from 0.14 (multistage) to 0.00005 (Gamma) mg/kg b.w. per day, see Table J13. The two graphs in Figure J13 show the fit of the Multistage and the Weibull (BMDL 10 = 0.0005) models, respectively. No BMDL 10 was determined from the dose-response data for this endpoint and this data set since the BMD/BMDL ratios and the range of the BMDL values of the acceptable models are larger than one order of magnitude. Using a modelling policy different from EFSA (2009) and allowing restrictions to the models the ADTSR reported a BMDL 10 = 0.14 mg/kg b.w. per day, which would correspond to the highest BMDL 10 value observed among non-restricted models. Restricted models resulted, as expected, in higher BMDL 10 values, e.g. 0.37 mg/kg b.w. per day for the multistage and the Weibull model but were not used for dose-response assessment in this opinion. EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3595 243
- Page 191 and 192: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 193 and 194: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 195 and 196: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 197 and 198: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 199 and 200: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 201 and 202: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 203 and 204: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 205 and 206: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 207 and 208: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 209 and 210: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 211 and 212: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 213 and 214: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 215 and 216: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 217 and 218: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 219 and 220: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 221 and 222: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 223 and 224: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 225 and 226: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 227 and 228: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 229 and 230: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 231 and 232: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 233 and 234: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 235 and 236: J.1.2. mice Chromium in food and bo
- Page 237 and 238: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 239 and 240: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 241: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 245 and 246: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 247 and 248: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 249 and 250: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 251 and 252: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 253 and 254: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 255 and 256: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 257 and 258: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 259 and 260: Chromium in food and bottled water
- Page 261: Chromium in food and bottled water
Chromium in <strong>food</strong> and bottled <strong>water</strong><br />
J2. BMD analysis of Chromium (VI): non-neoplastic lesions<br />
This part of the appendix informs on the details when applying the BMD approach to the incidences of<br />
the following five types of non-neoplastic lesions:<br />
• chronic inflammation of the liver in female rats;<br />
• diffuse epithelial hyperplasia in the duodenum in male and female mice;<br />
• hystiocytic cellular infiltration in mesenteric lymph nodes in male and female mice;<br />
• hystiocytic cellular infiltration in liver in female mice;<br />
• acinus,cytoplasmic alteration in pancreas.<br />
reported in Table 22. The dose-response data of the respevive endpoint are shown on top of the five<br />
tables displayed below.<br />
J.2.1.<br />
Chronic inflammation of the liver in female rats<br />
For the dose-resposne analysis of the incidence of chronic inflammation of the liver in female rats<br />
five of the non-restricted models (log-probit, log-logistic, multistage, Weibull, and Gamma) showed an<br />
acceptable fit (p > 0.05). However the BMD 10 values ranged from 0.2 to 0.001 mg/kg b.w. per day and<br />
the BMDL 10 values from 0.14 (multistage) to 0.00005 (Gamma) mg/kg b.w. per day, see Table J13. The<br />
two graphs in Figure J13 show the fit of the Multistage and the Weibull (BMDL 10 = 0.0005) models,<br />
respectively.<br />
No BMDL 10 was determined from the dose-response data for this endpoint and this data set since the<br />
BMD/BMDL ratios and the range of the BMDL values of the acceptable models are larger than one<br />
order of magnitude.<br />
Using a modelling policy different from EFSA (2009) and allowing restrictions to the models the<br />
ADTSR reported a BMDL 10 = 0.14 mg/kg b.w. per day, which would correspond to the highest<br />
BMDL 10 value observed among non-restricted models.<br />
Restricted models resulted, as expected, in higher BMDL 10 values, e.g. 0.37 mg/kg b.w. per day for the<br />
multistage and the Weibull model but were not used for dose-response assessment in this <strong>opinion</strong>.<br />
EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3595 243