efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water

efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water efsa-opinion-chromium-food-drinking-water

damienvanherp
from damienvanherp More from this publisher
16.04.2014 Views

Chromium in food and drinking water annual average concentrations of (total) chromium, particulate Cr, Cr(III), and Cr(VI) were estimated respectively as 4.6, 2.2, 0.8, and 1.2 nM (0.24, 0.11, 0.042, and 0.062 µg/L). Distinct seasonal and diurnal variability in the rainwater concentrations of the various chromium species were observed. Based on the results of a total global flux study, the authors concluded that essentially all chromium released into the atmosphere is removed via wet deposition and that about half this chromium is dissolved with similar concentrations of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) forms. Natural chromium concentrations in seawater were reported to typially range between 0.04 and 0.5 μg/L; in the North Sea, a concentration of 0.7 µg/L was detected (WHO, 2003). The natural total chromium content of surface waters was reported to be approximately in the range 0.5-2 µg/L while dissolved chromium concentrations were generally in the range 0.02-0.3 µg/L; chromium concentrations in Antarctic lakes (range, < 0.6-30 µg/L) appeared to increase as depth increased (WHO, 2003). In most surface waters, chromium levels were by-and-large between 1 and 10 µg/L, in general reflecting the impact of industrial activity. In USA rivers and lakes, chromium concentrations from less than 1 to 30 and below 5 µg/L, respectively, were reported by OEHHA (2011); however, in U.S. surface waters levels up to 84 µg/L were also detected (WHO, 2003). In the 1960s, chromium concentrations in the Canadian Great Lakes averaged approximately 1 µg/L (range, < 0.2-19 µg/L), while concentrations in rivers were found between 2 and 23 µg/L. In central Canada, surface water concentrations in the period 1980-1985 ranged from less than 2 to 44 µg/L, while for the Atlantic region the concentrations fell between less than 2 and 24 µg/L (Health Canada, 1986). In the river Rhine, chromium levels were reported to be below 10 µg/L (WHO, 2003). Chromium concentrations in groundwater are generally low (< 1 µg/L) (WHO, 2003). In the Netherlands, a mean concentration of 0.7 µg/L was measured (≤ 5 µg/L). In India, 50 % of 1 473 water samples from dug wells contained less than 2 µg/L. A 1976-1977 survey of Canadian drinking water supplies suggested that the maximum levels of chromium in unprocessed and treated waters were up to 14 and 9 (median, 2) µg/L, respectively (Méranger et al., 1979; Health Canada, 1986). Chromium concentrations in water samples taken from a large number of U.S. drinking water sources in 1974-1975 were on average below 2 µg/L (range 0.4-8.0 µg/L) (DHEW, 1970; WHO, 2003). Over the period 1984-1996, California water monitoring activities detected (total) chromium in about 9 % of the numerous sources surveyed, with levels up to a maximum of 1100 μg/L (mean, 23 μg/L; median, 17 μg/L) (OEHHA, 2011). In 2001 the California Department of Public Health (CDPH, then the California Department of Health Services, CDHS) added Cr(VI) to the list of unregulated chemicals for which monitoring is required (UCMR). Results of 2000-2012 UCMR monitoring from over 7000 drinking water sources vulnerable to contamination showed Cr(VI) at or above 1 µg/L (reporting detection limit) in about one-third of them (2432) with the following distribution breakdown (Cr(VI) concentration range, proportion of detections): 1-10 µg/L, 86.0 %; 11- 20 µg/L, 10.2 %; 21-30 µg/L, 2.7 %; 31-40 µg/L, 0.7 %; 41-50 µg/L, 0.2 %; over 50 µg/L, 0.2 %. Detections concerned sources and not drinking water served to customers (CDPH, 2013). A Water Research Foundation project in 2004 surveyed more than 400 drinking water sources (before treatment) across the USA and found an average Cr(VI) concentration of 1.1 μg/L (median concentration below the 0.2 μg/L detection limit) (McNeill et al., 2012a, b). Cr(VI) was found in many drinking water systems by a nationwide survey carried out in 2005-2009 by the U.S. Environmental Working Group (EWG) (Sutton, 2010). Recently, the U.S. EPA (2010) indicated that for the nearly 186 000 records analysed in public drinking water supplies, 15.3 % of samples had detectable total chromium concentrations, with a median of 4.2 µg/L and a 90 th percentile of 10 µg/L (min-max 0.009-5200 µg/L). Total dissolved chromium is the parameter most often determined in trace element analyses of environmental fresh waters and waters for human consumption: however, both the trivalent and hexavalent forms were shown to exist in surface waters. As water treatment facilities use strong oxidants to potabilise water, in drinking water chromium may easily be present in the hexavalent state (Schroeder and Lee, 1975; Health Canada, 1986). Chromium levels in soils can vary up to three orders of magnitude, reflecting the composition of the parent rock from which the soils were formed and/or local anthropogenic sources (WHO, 1988, 2000). In ultramafic (or ultrabasic) and serpentine rocks, chromium (as Cr(III)) may be present at concentrations in the order of thousands of mg/kg, whereas in granitic rocks and coal the element is on EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3595 18

Chromium in food and drinking water average found at a few mg/kg levels. Rare crocoite (PbCrO 4 ) is the only mineral where Cr(VI) occurs naturally. Soils from the weathering of basalt, serpentine and ultramafic rocks, and phosphorites may contain chromium at levels as high as 3500 mg/kg, whereas soils from degradation of granite or sandstone rocks normally have chromium only at levels of a few tens of mg/kg. Chromium concentrations in thousands of USA and Canadian soil samples were reported to range from 1 to 2000 and from 5 to 1500 mg/kg, respectively, with corresponding geometric means of 37 and 43 mg/kg (WHO, 1988; ATSDR, 2012). Examples of hot spots can be found, for instance associated with old chromite mining sites; chromium has also been detected at a very high level (43 000 mg/kg) in soil at the Butterworth Landfill site in Grand Rapid City, Michigan. The use of chromated copper arsenate (CCA) as an outdoor wood preservative may be a cause for soil contamination. In 1994 and 1995, chromium was detected in sediments obtained from the coastal waters of the eastern U.S. seashore at concentrations lower than 0.2 mg/g (Hyland et al., 1998). Examples of Cr(VI) occurrence from incidental anthropogenic sources As human exposure to toxic Cr(VI) compounds, several of which are quite soluble, is a matter of health concern, investigations and monitoring activities have been and are performed in different parts of the world, especially focused on assessing the chemical presence and levels in drinking water and its sources. From the generic examples described hereafter, drinking water seems to be the matrix of concern with respect to a potential human exposure deriving from an undetected accidental contamination. An accidental release of Cr(VI) from a chemical plant into the atmosphere occurred in August 2011 in Kooragang Island (Newcastle, New South Wales). The aerosol emission carrying Cr(VI) was deposited downwind of the stack, mostly on and around the facility. The spill continued for approximately 20 minutes. The original Cr(VI) emission estimate of 10-20 kg was subsequently revised to an estimated 1 kg of Cr(VI) which, in fact, rained down over the Orica plant; another 35-60 g fell out over the suburb of Stockton (Orica, 2012), whose residents were therefore potentially exposed to the contaminated aerosol. Approximately 20 workers at the plant were exposed as well as 70 nearby homes in Stockton. The contamination of drinking water in the southern California town of Hinkley ensued from a prolonged groundwater contamination (EWG, 2005; Sutton, 2010). At the center of the case was a facility called the Hinkley compressor station, part of a long natural gas pipeline. Between 1952 and 1966, the compressor station used water containing Cr(VI) compounds to fight corrosion in the machinery. Some Cr(VI)-contaminated wastewater, discharged to unlined ponds at the site, percolated into the groundwater, affecting a large area near the plant. Average background Cr(VI) levels in groundwater were recorded as 1.2 µg/L (total chromium 1.5 µg/L) with a peak of 3.1 µg/L (total chromium 3.2 µg/L) (PG&E, 2007; CA EPA, 2008). A contaminated groundwater plume originating from unknown source(s) allegedly composed of hazardous substances that were released into the Edwards-Trinity aquifer was detected at Midland (Texas), a community of approximately 114 000 people. At the time of the report by Cook (2010), the plume had an extension of a few kilometres and was situated under approximately 105 ha of residential and commercial land. Based on the results of a domestic drinking water well, an extensive groundwater sampling was performed in 2009. The groundwater plume contained elevated concentrations of total chromium including Cr(VI), that exceeded the U.S. EPA maximum contaminant limit (MCL) of 0.1 mg/L for total chromium and Cr(VI) in many active domestic water wells: in particular, a large proportion of samples contained total chromium and/or Cr(VI) forms in the range 500-5000 µg/L. According to Vasilatos et al. (2008), total chromium and Cr(VI) were measured in the Thiva-Tanagra- Malakasa basin, Eastern Sterea Hellas, Greece. In the area, which is known for a 40-year long industrial activity, chromium levels as high as 80 and 53 µg/L were found in the urban drinking water supplies of Oropos and Inofyta, respectively. The pollution of groundwater by Cr(VI) in the majority of water wells in the Thiva-Tanagra-Malakasa basin was related to the widespread industrial activity, the use of hexavalent chromium in various processes, and the discharges of Cr-containing wastes. In another study (Vasilatos et al., 2010), hexavalent chromium was detected in groundwater systems in EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3595 19

Chromium in <strong>food</strong> and <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong><br />

annual average concentrations of (total) <strong>chromium</strong>, particulate Cr, Cr(III), and Cr(VI) were estimated<br />

respectively as 4.6, 2.2, 0.8, and 1.2 nM (0.24, 0.11, 0.042, and 0.062 µg/L). Distinct seasonal and<br />

diurnal variability in the rain<strong>water</strong> concentrations of the various <strong>chromium</strong> species were observed.<br />

Based on the results of a total global flux study, the authors concluded that essentially all <strong>chromium</strong><br />

released into the atmosphere is removed via wet deposition and that about half this <strong>chromium</strong> is<br />

dissolved with similar concentrations of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) forms.<br />

Natural <strong>chromium</strong> concentrations in sea<strong>water</strong> were reported to typially range between 0.04 and<br />

0.5 μg/L; in the North Sea, a concentration of 0.7 µg/L was detected (WHO, 2003). The natural total<br />

<strong>chromium</strong> content of surface <strong>water</strong>s was reported to be approximately in the range 0.5-2 µg/L while<br />

dissolved <strong>chromium</strong> concentrations were generally in the range 0.02-0.3 µg/L; <strong>chromium</strong><br />

concentrations in Antarctic lakes (range, < 0.6-30 µg/L) appeared to increase as depth increased<br />

(WHO, 2003). In most surface <strong>water</strong>s, <strong>chromium</strong> levels were by-and-large between 1 and 10 µg/L, in<br />

general reflecting the impact of industrial activity. In USA rivers and lakes, <strong>chromium</strong> concentrations<br />

from less than 1 to 30 and below 5 µg/L, respectively, were reported by OEHHA (2011); however, in<br />

U.S. surface <strong>water</strong>s levels up to 84 µg/L were also detected (WHO, 2003). In the 1960s, <strong>chromium</strong><br />

concentrations in the Canadian Great Lakes averaged approximately 1 µg/L (range, < 0.2-19 µg/L),<br />

while concentrations in rivers were found between 2 and 23 µg/L. In central Canada, surface <strong>water</strong><br />

concentrations in the period 1980-1985 ranged from less than 2 to 44 µg/L, while for the Atlantic<br />

region the concentrations fell between less than 2 and 24 µg/L (Health Canada, 1986). In the river<br />

Rhine, <strong>chromium</strong> levels were reported to be below 10 µg/L (WHO, 2003).<br />

Chromium concentrations in ground<strong>water</strong> are generally low (< 1 µg/L) (WHO, 2003). In the<br />

Netherlands, a mean concentration of 0.7 µg/L was measured (≤ 5 µg/L). In India, 50 % of<br />

1 473 <strong>water</strong> samples from dug wells contained less than 2 µg/L. A 1976-1977 survey of Canadian<br />

<strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong> supplies suggested that the maximum levels of <strong>chromium</strong> in unprocessed and treated<br />

<strong>water</strong>s were up to 14 and 9 (median, 2) µg/L, respectively (Méranger et al., 1979; Health Canada,<br />

1986). Chromium concentrations in <strong>water</strong> samples taken from a large number of U.S. <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong><br />

sources in 1974-1975 were on average below 2 µg/L (range 0.4-8.0 µg/L) (DHEW, 1970; WHO,<br />

2003). Over the period 1984-1996, California <strong>water</strong> monitoring activities detected (total) <strong>chromium</strong> in<br />

about 9 % of the numerous sources surveyed, with levels up to a maximum of 1100 μg/L (mean,<br />

23 μg/L; median, 17 μg/L) (OEHHA, 2011). In 2001 the California Department of Public Health<br />

(CDPH, then the California Department of Health Services, CDHS) added Cr(VI) to the list of<br />

unregulated chemicals for which monitoring is required (UCMR). Results of 2000-2012 UCMR<br />

monitoring from over 7000 <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong> sources vulnerable to contamination showed Cr(VI) at or<br />

above 1 µg/L (reporting detection limit) in about one-third of them (2432) with the following<br />

distribution breakdown (Cr(VI) concentration range, proportion of detections): 1-10 µg/L, 86.0 %; 11-<br />

20 µg/L, 10.2 %; 21-30 µg/L, 2.7 %; 31-40 µg/L, 0.7 %; 41-50 µg/L, 0.2 %; over 50 µg/L, 0.2 %.<br />

Detections concerned sources and not <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong> served to customers (CDPH, 2013). A Water<br />

Research Foundation project in 2004 surveyed more than 400 <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong> sources (before<br />

treatment) across the USA and found an average Cr(VI) concentration of 1.1 μg/L (median<br />

concentration below the 0.2 μg/L detection limit) (McNeill et al., 2012a, b). Cr(VI) was found in many<br />

<strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong> systems by a nationwide survey carried out in 2005-2009 by the U.S. Environmental<br />

Working Group (EWG) (Sutton, 2010). Recently, the U.S. EPA (2010) indicated that for the nearly<br />

186 000 records analysed in public <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong> supplies, 15.3 % of samples had detectable total<br />

<strong>chromium</strong> concentrations, with a median of 4.2 µg/L and a 90 th percentile of 10 µg/L (min-max<br />

0.009-5200 µg/L). Total dissolved <strong>chromium</strong> is the parameter most often determined in trace element<br />

analyses of environmental fresh <strong>water</strong>s and <strong>water</strong>s for human consumption: however, both the<br />

trivalent and hexavalent forms were shown to exist in surface <strong>water</strong>s. As <strong>water</strong> treatment facilities use<br />

strong oxidants to potabilise <strong>water</strong>, in <strong>drinking</strong> <strong>water</strong> <strong>chromium</strong> may easily be present in the<br />

hexavalent state (Schroeder and Lee, 1975; Health Canada, 1986).<br />

Chromium levels in soils can vary up to three orders of magnitude, reflecting the composition of the<br />

parent rock from which the soils were formed and/or local anthropogenic sources (WHO, 1988, 2000).<br />

In ultramafic (or ultrabasic) and serpentine rocks, <strong>chromium</strong> (as Cr(III)) may be present at<br />

concentrations in the order of thousands of mg/kg, whereas in granitic rocks and coal the element is on<br />

EFSA Journal 2014;12(3):3595 18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!