15.04.2014 Views

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Tombrello</strong>–82<br />

ASPATURIAN: You seem to have become aware quite early of the need to keep a secure flow of<br />

funding going. How about your colleagues? Were they as aware of this, or was there sort of an<br />

ivory-tower attitude among some of them?<br />

TOMBRELLO: I think there was definitely an ivory-tower attitude.<br />

ASPATURIAN: And how did that play out?<br />

TOMBRELLO: It played out badly for me in some ways. I felt we needed more money to support<br />

the infrastructure. Now we’re jumping ahead to 1973, maybe just a little bit before that—maybe<br />

starting in 1969, <strong>with</strong> the moon landing. By now, I’m the PI on the Kellogg grant, and we’re<br />

getting into analyzing lunar samples. We’re also looking at radiation damage, because the<br />

reactor people wanted people who were doing things that were connected <strong>with</strong> radiation damage,<br />

and there were small amounts of money to do that. There was money from China Lake Naval<br />

Weapons Center to do some analysis on surfaces. These were projects for which people would<br />

pay to use the facilities here. The students could get involved <strong>with</strong> them, and the money could<br />

help pay some of the lab technicians and accelerator operating costs. But the work wasn’t<br />

nuclear physics, and it wasn’t published usually in Phys. Rev. [Physical Review Letters]. It was<br />

published other places. A lot of it was interesting science. But it was different. To be honest, I<br />

think my Kellogg colleagues would have settled for a smaller program—just done a lot less and<br />

had fewer visitors, fewer students, fewer postdocs. But Kellogg was so unusual. The other<br />

groups in physics didn’t seem to have the money at that time to bring in visitors that way. For<br />

instance, the visitors in astrophysics who came through were mostly funded by Kellogg, not<br />

astronomy. Because, you see, since <strong>Caltech</strong> had always supported Palomar, Palomar didn’t get<br />

much in outside funding. They were supported, and still are, largely by the general budget. It<br />

was not an entitlement program; it was kind of a payoff on an endowment for Palomar that had<br />

gotten rolled into the general budget, which at one point in the past I looked at fairly carefully to<br />

see who had come out on top in that one. But there wasn’t money to bring in very many visitors.<br />

Kellogg was just unique. Willy had done a fantastic job.<br />

ASPATURIAN: It sounds like it had a remarkable culture.<br />

http://resolver.caltech.edu/<strong>Caltech</strong>OH:OH_<strong>Tombrello</strong>_T

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!