15.04.2014 Views

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Tombrello</strong>–80<br />

TOMBRELLO: No. I don’t remember him as an undergrad, so we may have just missed each<br />

other. [Thorne received his BS in 1962—ed.] He had been John Wheeler’s graduate student at<br />

Princeton. Willy brought him back for absolutely the wrong reason, but it was absolutely a case<br />

of perfect serendipity. Maarten Schmidt [Moseley Professor of Astronomy] had discovered the<br />

quasi-stellar objects.<br />

ASPATURIAN: The quasars.<br />

TOMBRELLO: They saw these things at what turned out to be huge redshifts. At first we didn’t<br />

know if they were at local or at cosmological distances. Willy thought they were supermassive<br />

stars.<br />

ASPATURIAN: Really. I didn’t know that.<br />

TOMBRELLO: They weren’t, of course—although if you start thinking about it, there was<br />

probably a period somewhere in the history of the universe where there were stars of hundreds of<br />

solar masses. They did have unusual properties. But Willy decided that you had to understand<br />

relativity if you wanted to get at these objects and understand how they generated all that energy.<br />

So he figured, OK, he knew this very bright, versatile student: “Get him back to work on that.”<br />

Of course, Thorne had his own game plan. And very quickly they realized this was not likely to<br />

be the mechanism that powered quasars. In fact, I remember being at a party, where someone—I<br />

think it may have been Donald Lynden-Bell, but I’m not sure—was explaining that we’re really<br />

talking about a completely different mechanism for the quasi-stellar objects, which probably<br />

turned out to be correct. But in any case, Maarten never won the Nobel Prize for discovering the<br />

redshifts of quasars. I nominated him personally for it several times. But he did win the Kavli<br />

Prize [2008], so finally there’s justice in the world. Fred Kavli gave him the prize he should<br />

have won from Stockholm. It was a nice prize, and I’m very happy about that one. The original<br />

discovery happened probably about the time I left for Yale and came back—that period.<br />

A number of things happened in that year. Gell-Mann had moved on from the Eightfold<br />

Way [a taxonomy of the elementary particles—ed.], and he and a former PhD student here,<br />

George Zweig, had separately come up <strong>with</strong> the idea of quarks—well, aces in the case of<br />

George. That was the big new thing—that protons and neutrons and all these other particles<br />

http://resolver.caltech.edu/<strong>Caltech</strong>OH:OH_<strong>Tombrello</strong>_T

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!