Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Tombrello</strong>–80<br />
TOMBRELLO: No. I don’t remember him as an undergrad, so we may have just missed each<br />
other. [Thorne received his BS in 1962—ed.] He had been John Wheeler’s graduate student at<br />
Princeton. Willy brought him back for absolutely the wrong reason, but it was absolutely a case<br />
of perfect serendipity. Maarten Schmidt [Moseley Professor of Astronomy] had discovered the<br />
quasi-stellar objects.<br />
ASPATURIAN: The quasars.<br />
TOMBRELLO: They saw these things at what turned out to be huge redshifts. At first we didn’t<br />
know if they were at local or at cosmological distances. Willy thought they were supermassive<br />
stars.<br />
ASPATURIAN: Really. I didn’t know that.<br />
TOMBRELLO: They weren’t, of course—although if you start thinking about it, there was<br />
probably a period somewhere in the history of the universe where there were stars of hundreds of<br />
solar masses. They did have unusual properties. But Willy decided that you had to understand<br />
relativity if you wanted to get at these objects and understand how they generated all that energy.<br />
So he figured, OK, he knew this very bright, versatile student: “Get him back to work on that.”<br />
Of course, Thorne had his own game plan. And very quickly they realized this was not likely to<br />
be the mechanism that powered quasars. In fact, I remember being at a party, where someone—I<br />
think it may have been Donald Lynden-Bell, but I’m not sure—was explaining that we’re really<br />
talking about a completely different mechanism for the quasi-stellar objects, which probably<br />
turned out to be correct. But in any case, Maarten never won the Nobel Prize for discovering the<br />
redshifts of quasars. I nominated him personally for it several times. But he did win the Kavli<br />
Prize [2008], so finally there’s justice in the world. Fred Kavli gave him the prize he should<br />
have won from Stockholm. It was a nice prize, and I’m very happy about that one. The original<br />
discovery happened probably about the time I left for Yale and came back—that period.<br />
A number of things happened in that year. Gell-Mann had moved on from the Eightfold<br />
Way [a taxonomy of the elementary particles—ed.], and he and a former PhD student here,<br />
George Zweig, had separately come up <strong>with</strong> the idea of quarks—well, aces in the case of<br />
George. That was the big new thing—that protons and neutrons and all these other particles<br />
http://resolver.caltech.edu/<strong>Caltech</strong>OH:OH_<strong>Tombrello</strong>_T