Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Tombrello</strong>–214<br />
TOMBRELLO: Yes!<br />
ASPATURIAN: The U.K.<br />
TOMBRELLO: Close. Canada. We are not gregarious like GPS [Geological and Planetary<br />
Sciences], but we are collegial. We have a few equivalences of the French-Canadians; those are<br />
the astronomers—bombs in the mailbox and that kind of thing. But still, when push comes to<br />
shove, we may be dull, but we’re collegial. We’re not gregarious. But we do agree on priorities.<br />
That’s why I started out <strong>with</strong> setting those three priorities, and the whole division got behind it.<br />
Even math; because math figured in some of this stuff—like the Fairchilds. They get one of the<br />
Fairchilds every year. Hey! It’s a win for them, too. And some of the string theorists work <strong>with</strong><br />
the mathematicians. We can, when it comes to it, agree on a few priorities, whereas Biology at<br />
<strong>Caltech</strong> has a very hard time <strong>with</strong> that. I don’t know what I’d say the Biology Division was. I’d<br />
say “dysfunctional” is the word that comes to mind, and that’s not a national group. How can<br />
such a small group be so divided, so contentious?<br />
But anyway, people say, “What was it like, being chairman? What problems did you<br />
have <strong>with</strong> your colleagues?” I’d say that most of my problems were <strong>with</strong> the <strong>Caltech</strong><br />
administration or <strong>with</strong> the administrative groups at <strong>Caltech</strong>. At the end of the day, people don’t<br />
always agree in Physics, Math, and Astronomy, but they can get together.<br />
Another thing I did—time now to talk about Mathematics. Mathematics was probably<br />
down below number ten nationally when I came in. They had hired some good people. They’d<br />
lost some good people. My philosophy for them was that you always go for really good people.<br />
And don’t get disheartened if you don’t get them. You make a lot of appointments, and you’re<br />
always going to lose a few. Some are not going to come. You make them good offers, maybe<br />
just a step ahead of where they are professionally, and you just play that consistent strategy.<br />
Now we’re number seven, and I think I had a lot to do <strong>with</strong> that. I think at the moment they are<br />
losing a few people. You have to get used to it. It’s still the farm-team problem. But we have<br />
ratcheted ourselves up. We were stuck down in the rankings <strong>with</strong> Yale, and now we’ve left Yale<br />
in the dust. We are number seven, and they are probably still stuck around ten or eleven. We<br />
have blown past a number of places. But we still can lose the good people I had something to do<br />
<strong>with</strong> hiring. The department just has to get over the fact that you’re not going to get everybody<br />
http://resolver.caltech.edu/<strong>Caltech</strong>OH:OH_<strong>Tombrello</strong>_T