15.04.2014 Views

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Tombrello</strong>–192<br />

Union and the United States had every reason to keep everybody under very tight control. We<br />

prevented a lot of things from happening just by sheer intimidation. It was as if you had a<br />

pressure cooker and you kept the lid nailed down tight. And my prediction in 1992 was that<br />

we’re no longer controlling the pressure cooker, and it’s building up; and we don’t know where<br />

everything is going, but it’s not just two players anymore, it’s everybody. That’s when I<br />

suggested that Livermore get into another line of business. That even if peace were coming, we<br />

still want to read other people’s mail. I said they should get into the surveillance business,<br />

intelligence business. Widgets for the intelligence crowd. I made a basic mistake in that. I<br />

looked on the CIA, <strong>with</strong> its enormous budget, as being a monolith to whom you could sell all<br />

sorts of things. But I got it completely wrong. The CIA is huge. It has a huge budget. But you<br />

will sell a widget in one office, and the guy next door couldn’t care less; he wants a different<br />

widget. So it became a much more interesting sales job, and the people that worked <strong>with</strong> that<br />

program at Livermore were geniuses at marketing something that was a marketing nightmare,<br />

which is equipment to help you determine proliferation and things like that.<br />

ASPATURIAN: Well, it’s very necessary, isn’t it?<br />

TOMBRELLO: It’s very necessary, but it was a different marketing challenge than I had<br />

anticipated. It was not what I expected at all. I was right, but it was a much bigger challenge.<br />

I’m pleased that Livermore made it into about a $300-million-a-year enterprise.<br />

ASPATURIAN: Anything else you’d like to add to this particular session?<br />

TOMBRELLO: No. I think I mentioned that the ultimate thing is, What is the ultimate role of, not<br />

just the weapons labs in the future but all the national laboratories? What is their long-term<br />

function? Do they have a vision? The origin of the Argonne National Laboratory was the<br />

reactor program, the Light Water Reactor Program. Well, they don’t do that anymore. I’m not<br />

just picking on Argonne National Lab—I’m picking on Brookhaven; I’m picking on Livermore;<br />

Sandia; Los Alamos.<br />

I think that’s probably it. I think there’s not much more to the national labs. We can do<br />

the division tomorrow, starting on that.<br />

http://resolver.caltech.edu/<strong>Caltech</strong>OH:OH_<strong>Tombrello</strong>_T

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!