Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Tombrello</strong>–192<br />
Union and the United States had every reason to keep everybody under very tight control. We<br />
prevented a lot of things from happening just by sheer intimidation. It was as if you had a<br />
pressure cooker and you kept the lid nailed down tight. And my prediction in 1992 was that<br />
we’re no longer controlling the pressure cooker, and it’s building up; and we don’t know where<br />
everything is going, but it’s not just two players anymore, it’s everybody. That’s when I<br />
suggested that Livermore get into another line of business. That even if peace were coming, we<br />
still want to read other people’s mail. I said they should get into the surveillance business,<br />
intelligence business. Widgets for the intelligence crowd. I made a basic mistake in that. I<br />
looked on the CIA, <strong>with</strong> its enormous budget, as being a monolith to whom you could sell all<br />
sorts of things. But I got it completely wrong. The CIA is huge. It has a huge budget. But you<br />
will sell a widget in one office, and the guy next door couldn’t care less; he wants a different<br />
widget. So it became a much more interesting sales job, and the people that worked <strong>with</strong> that<br />
program at Livermore were geniuses at marketing something that was a marketing nightmare,<br />
which is equipment to help you determine proliferation and things like that.<br />
ASPATURIAN: Well, it’s very necessary, isn’t it?<br />
TOMBRELLO: It’s very necessary, but it was a different marketing challenge than I had<br />
anticipated. It was not what I expected at all. I was right, but it was a much bigger challenge.<br />
I’m pleased that Livermore made it into about a $300-million-a-year enterprise.<br />
ASPATURIAN: Anything else you’d like to add to this particular session?<br />
TOMBRELLO: No. I think I mentioned that the ultimate thing is, What is the ultimate role of, not<br />
just the weapons labs in the future but all the national laboratories? What is their long-term<br />
function? Do they have a vision? The origin of the Argonne National Laboratory was the<br />
reactor program, the Light Water Reactor Program. Well, they don’t do that anymore. I’m not<br />
just picking on Argonne National Lab—I’m picking on Brookhaven; I’m picking on Livermore;<br />
Sandia; Los Alamos.<br />
I think that’s probably it. I think there’s not much more to the national labs. We can do<br />
the division tomorrow, starting on that.<br />
http://resolver.caltech.edu/<strong>Caltech</strong>OH:OH_<strong>Tombrello</strong>_T