Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Tombrello</strong>–179<br />
nuclear counterterrorism. It was a very good committee, including a former director of<br />
Livermore named Bruce Tarter.<br />
ASPATURIAN: Was this a Livermore-based team?<br />
TOMBRELLO: The people were mostly from outside. There were two people basically from the<br />
lab. One was Tarter, who had retired as director some years before. And one was General John<br />
Gordon, who had been associated <strong>with</strong> the University of California and was director of<br />
Homeland Security for a while. It was interesting.<br />
ASPATURIAN: Was this committee under the umbrella of Homeland Security?<br />
TOMBRELLO: No. It was under the umbrella of the lab.<br />
ASPATURIAN: OK. So they were the initiating agency.<br />
TOMBRELLO: And I chaired it. The goal of the committee as I enunciated it—because it was my<br />
idea—was not just to write a report but to write a report that would end up on the desk of the<br />
new president. We didn’t know who it was going to be. It could be Obama. It could have been<br />
McCain. But we felt that this was important. Our analysis of it, we started off jokingly, would<br />
be based on this discussion of the 3:00 a.m. phone call. If you remember, that was the Hillary<br />
Clinton campaign ad that asked, Whom do you want in the White House when the emergency<br />
call comes? So we asked, What would be the substance of that 3:00 a.m. phone call? What<br />
would be something so urgent and critical that you would wake up the president for it? We<br />
decided that one of the highest probabilities was that some foreign country or terrorist group,<br />
particularly a terrorist group, had a nuclear weapon or had the materials from which you could<br />
construct one. And probably that truly would be a 3:00 a.m. phone call. We wanted to analyze<br />
this problem from the point of view of how well would the information that we knew about, and<br />
were getting presentations, travel through the system, and how good would be the information on<br />
which the president would have to make a decision? We wanted the new president to see this.<br />
The upshot—to make a long story short—is that Obama has spoken several times in<br />
public about the proliferation issue, the nuclear counterterrorism issue, the stockpile issues; and<br />
http://resolver.caltech.edu/<strong>Caltech</strong>OH:OH_<strong>Tombrello</strong>_T