Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Tombrello</strong>–139<br />
TOMBRELLO: Yes. But I think the trustees liked and trusted Tom Everhart, and they should<br />
have. He’s solid. He’s dependable. I think they liked that. And he worked very hard to build a<br />
very powerful Board of Trustees.<br />
ASPATURIAN: When you say “powerful,” you mean really supportive of and invested in <strong>Caltech</strong>?<br />
TOMBRELLO: Supportive of. They played on a big stage. They were rich. They were generous.<br />
I would say he coupled the trustees more closely to <strong>Caltech</strong> than other presidents had, and they<br />
were quite a bunch. I don’t think he would be— I would consider him a gentlemanly C as a<br />
president. Nothing disastrous, except the fact that some of his vice presidents were out of<br />
control. Morrisroe, who had done a fantastic job for Brown, was clearly running his own show.<br />
And that happens when someone who is one layer down in the organization is not integrated <strong>with</strong><br />
the overall strategy. There probably wasn’t an overall strategy—except the big strategy of<br />
getting the trustees organized. But Everhart was allowed to finish his term.<br />
ASPATURIAN: I’d like to ask about the provosts under Everhart. He started <strong>with</strong> Barclay Kamb,<br />
is that right?<br />
TOMBRELLO: I’m glad you brought that back up. Because I don’t think they could<br />
communicate. It wasn’t entirely Everhart’s fault. Barclay communicates differently than other<br />
people. If you’re a fan of Barclay, you take the time, because in that communication is wisdom.<br />
As I mentioned when we talked about my being at Schlumberger, Barclay, Frank Press, John<br />
Deutch, and I were on the original Schlumberger visiting committee. Even the people on the<br />
committee, including Press—who was a fan of Barclay’s, because Press of course had been here<br />
and run the Seismo Lab before he went to MIT—were frustrated <strong>with</strong> Barclay. I thought Barclay<br />
was wonderful. I still do. He’s one of my heroes. If it’s hard to communicate <strong>with</strong> Barclay, take<br />
more time. It’s worth it. But I don’t think Everhart could do that, and he got more frustrated<br />
<strong>with</strong> it—and, as I say, it got kind of out of control, because I believe there were people trying to<br />
push their own agendas. Barclay was kind of in the way. I think a lot of people were<br />
campaigning to be provost.<br />
http://resolver.caltech.edu/<strong>Caltech</strong>OH:OH_<strong>Tombrello</strong>_T