15.04.2014 Views

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Tombrello</strong>–126<br />

government, should think clearly about. He had taken a job at, I believe, Goldman Sachs, having<br />

been a professor at MIT [Sloan School of Management]. Anyway, somebody said, “Well,<br />

what’s the difference between being at a university and being on Wall Street?” He says, “Well,<br />

market efficiency looks a lot different from the banks of the Charles than it does from the banks<br />

of the Hudson.” That’s a way of saying that assumptions in modern mathematical economics<br />

finance theory are sort of like the old joke about the physicist being asked to explain an elephant<br />

and saying, “Imagine a spherical elephant.” Well, the spherical elephant, you might say, is<br />

market efficiency. And some of the things that have happened financially in the last couple of<br />

years show that maybe someone should take a very hard look at that assumption.<br />

ASPATURIAN: That’s for sure. You asked me to remind you about Clair Patterson.<br />

TOMBRELLO: Ah, Pat Patterson. He never used Clair. A genius. A very unusual genius. Lots<br />

of stories and I know some of them, and I knew Pat pretty well. There were times when I knew<br />

Pat extremely well. Pat had done something absolutely remarkable. He never won a Nobel<br />

Prize, but he won the Tyler Prize for Environmental Achievement [1995].<br />

ASPATURIAN: Yes, he did. Not long before he died.<br />

TOMBRELLO: The whole lead thing. The lead thing was an enigma, because you knew there<br />

was a lot of lead being dumped in the atmosphere because so much tetraethyl lead was being<br />

used as an anti-knock agent in gasoline. And yet every sample you looked at had the same<br />

amount of lead in it. It was a lot of lead, but it was the same everywhere, no matter how you<br />

measured it. There was one interpretation of that: The environment is full of lead and it’s<br />

always been full of lead. Then along comes Patterson <strong>with</strong> his assumption, which was that<br />

everybody has been running contaminated samples for years and they haven’t figured out a way<br />

to get rid of the contamination. And Patterson figured out a way to get rid of the contamination<br />

and measure what was really in samples. The ice cores from the South Pole appeared—I must<br />

have been a postdoc that year, and I remember, it was so striking. You could see, you could<br />

track human development through the amount of lead in the environment as you went deeper<br />

into the ice. You could see the little blip—the amount rising—when humans first started making<br />

bronze. You could see the big increase when the Romans started using it for piping and plates<br />

http://resolver.caltech.edu/<strong>Caltech</strong>OH:OH_<strong>Tombrello</strong>_T

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!