Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Tombrello</strong>–119<br />
questions. But Murray, being Murray, got up and said, “Good. I’m glad that’s over <strong>with</strong>. Now<br />
we’re going to talk about what I’m interested in, which is Regge poles.” And we took off on<br />
Regge poles. I never thought about the book very often after that. Some years later, when I was<br />
running the research lab for Schlumberger, somebody said, “Could you get Gell-Mann to come<br />
here and give a seminar?” I said, “Sure. But why would you want to?” “Well, he’s a great<br />
man.” I said, “True. But he’ll come here and insult you.” “We don’t mind,” they said. “We<br />
don’t mind.” So we got Murray there, and in introducing him I told that book story. He looks at<br />
me and says, “I didn’t do it.” I said, “You did do it.” He said, “Well, maybe I did it.”<br />
[Laughter]<br />
Murray was a showman, and he baited us sometimes. There was one class where he was<br />
deriving something. We’d gone back to how you turn Feynman diagrams into integrals—<br />
because that’s what they are. They’re a type of shorthand for writing down a certain set of<br />
integrals, which gives you the probability of that particular reaction occurring. Murray is at the<br />
board, dropping all the constants. Pi’s have disappeared. 2’s have disappeared. Velocity of<br />
light has been set to 1; e has been set to 1. At the end of it, somebody—probably Eric<br />
Adelberger, who was, I believe, a second-, maybe third-year graduate student [PhD 1967]—<br />
sarcastically said, “You can’t calculate <strong>with</strong> it, Murray. It doesn’t have any of the constants in<br />
front of it.” Well, Murray turns around slowly and sneers at us—Murray can sneer—and says,<br />
“You want numbers.” “We want numbers.” And he says, “I’ll do it by dimensional analysis.” I<br />
laughed. Everyone laughed, because how can you get four pi’s <strong>with</strong> dimensional analysis?<br />
Maybe e and c you can get, but you’re not going to get four pi’s. So Murray races through this<br />
<strong>with</strong> a set of arguments that no one can follow. At the end of it, there is not only the integral but<br />
there are all these numbers in front of it. Well, nobody dares challenge it. But we write it down<br />
carefully. Go home and of course every one of those four pi’s and whatever were there and in<br />
the correct place. I am convinced he set us up, but I cannot prove it. It was—<br />
ASPATURIAN: A tour de force.<br />
TOMBRELLO: A tour de force, any way you describe it. It was an interesting class. You felt<br />
physics was being created before your very eyes. We would go home after the class and try to<br />
figure out if we could do something <strong>with</strong> it. It was magnificent.<br />
http://resolver.caltech.edu/<strong>Caltech</strong>OH:OH_<strong>Tombrello</strong>_T