15.04.2014 Views

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Tombrello</strong>–115<br />

protons, you didn’t get much neutron-rich stuff. They designed this bomb, which had its own<br />

problems, but it was, again, gun-assembled. It was longer. You needed higher velocity because<br />

of the plutonium-240, but they figured they could get around it. There were some other<br />

problems <strong>with</strong> the aerodynamic stability of this thing, which was called Thin Man. It tended to<br />

rotate in a plane rather than falling like an arrow. But they figured they could work that out. But<br />

when they got the first plutonium samples from the Hanford reactor, it had more 240 than the<br />

previous sample from Berkeley, and they knew they couldn’t assemble a gun to make critical<br />

mass. So almost immediately, they jumped into an implosion design, where you take something<br />

that’s roughly spherical and you compress it <strong>with</strong> high explosives so it becomes a smaller sphere,<br />

reaching critical mass that way.<br />

ASPATURIAN: Seth Neddermeyer.<br />

TOMBRELLO: I’m going to tell that story. I knew Seth.<br />

ASPATURIAN: You knew him?<br />

TOMBRELLO: Yes. I spent the summer once at the University of Washington, where he was at<br />

the time. But my Los Alamos question was, When did Oppenheimer start the implosion project?<br />

Because almost overnight, after they got those plutonium samples, they were doing implosion.<br />

And the answer was, Probably about day one. Seth Neddermeyer had this idea of implosion and<br />

had been given a tiny little room <strong>with</strong>, I think, five people to study implosion and do<br />

experiments—not very successful experiments, but doing them. That’s when I realized<br />

Oppenheimer was such a brilliant project manager. He anticipated a possible obstacle and he<br />

started working on it early in the project—not when he hit the obstacle but long before. Now,<br />

the interesting part of the story, from Neddermeyer’s point of view, and which Neddermeyer<br />

never quite liked, was that once Oppenheimer saw that implosion might be a solution to the<br />

critical-mass problem, that project went from five people to five hundred in a couple of days.<br />

Neddermeyer became an advisor to George Kistiakowsky, who was appointed to run it. Here<br />

Oppenheimer again showed the strength of a project manager, realizing that the person you had<br />

for the wild card was not necessarily the person you needed to implement his idea. That was<br />

truly brilliant.<br />

http://resolver.caltech.edu/<strong>Caltech</strong>OH:OH_<strong>Tombrello</strong>_T

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!