15.04.2014 Views

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

Interview with Thomas A. Tombrello - Caltech Oral Histories

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Tombrello</strong>–86<br />

because they knew Feynman and Christy. Matt had certainly been involved in all that, because<br />

the fast electronics had to have been used in stuff like that. He was either on the radar project or<br />

the bomb project. So he was here. Bob Walker was nominally in charge. Alvin Tollestrup was<br />

here for a long time until he went and built, basically, the superconducting magnets that make up<br />

the Tevatron. But he’d gotten his PhD in Kellogg [1950] and was kept on. As I say, it was not<br />

so unfriendly, though there were clearly, slightly below the surface, old antagonisms. You hired<br />

Kavanagh instead of Telegdi, you know, and this was something that was never going to go<br />

away.<br />

I see Murray [Gell-Mann] every few months now, and I am sure if we got to talking<br />

about the old days at <strong>Caltech</strong>, he’d probably mention it. “You know what Willy did!”—they all<br />

had things like that. I gather that Feynman and Gell-Mann at first had worked together and then<br />

later didn’t. Different styles. The place didn’t begin really to diversify in what I’d say were<br />

interesting ways until the mid to late 1980s. And I think the staffing committee had a lot to do<br />

<strong>with</strong> that. It made it also a necessity that you couldn’t hire everybody you wanted to, which<br />

meant that you could make a committee like that work, because there really wasn’t much<br />

alternative. If you just got into gridlock where nobody could agree on a candidate, you wouldn’t<br />

get anywhere. The only exception to that had been in 1975, when we had the three powerful<br />

PMA groups that basically said, We’ll each get one, and we’ll get best of show for the three, and<br />

we will hire them all at once, and we will shove it down Harold Brown’s throat. [See Session 2]<br />

ASPATURIAN: So, like a museum acquiring three masterpieces at once.<br />

TOMBRELLO: So that you don’t have to choose among an old master, a Jackson Pollock and, you<br />

know—<br />

ASPATURIAN: —an Impressionist.<br />

TOMBRELLO: The full spectrum. You get your Monet. Everybody gets something. But you<br />

have to be careful, because, you know, art museums that aren’t willing to diversify get into<br />

trouble. This is a good analogy for universities. I remember looking at the art of a friend of<br />

mine who used to run the Pasadena Art Museum before Norton Simon acquired it. Bill Agee<br />

went on to run the art museum in Houston, where they have a huge collection of Frederic<br />

http://resolver.caltech.edu/<strong>Caltech</strong>OH:OH_<strong>Tombrello</strong>_T

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!