Aerobic Adhesives VII – A New High Performance Bonding Option ...
Aerobic Adhesives VII – A New High Performance Bonding Option ...
Aerobic Adhesives VII – A New High Performance Bonding Option ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 3. Mercaptoester Polymerization<br />
>C=S< + R+ à R-C-S+ Addition Reaction Initiation<br />
R-C-S+ + >C=S< à R-C-S-C-S+ Chain Extension<br />
R-(-C-S-) n -C=S< or R-(-C-S-) n -C-S-R<br />
Termination<br />
Both the AAA’s and the Mercaptoesters cure upon exposure to UV light though the cure chemistries are different.<br />
Does this difference in composition then, result in a difference in performance? Laboratory testing of these two<br />
types of UV curing products in conjunction with a review of published literature has shown some significant<br />
distinguishing features. Figure 4 below shows a significant increase in both the speed of cure and strength of the<br />
AAA’s compared with the Mercaptoester based adhesives.<br />
Figure 4. Compression Strength Versus Time Following UV Cure<br />
Dymax OP-29*<br />
1000 psi<br />
No Post Bake Needed<br />
Post Bake<br />
Competitive <strong>Adhesives</strong><br />
Sample “C”<br />
Tensile Strength<br />
Sample “B”<br />
Sample “A”<br />
20-30 sec<br />
UV Light Curing (RT)<br />
1 Hour<br />
25 o C (77 o F)<br />
24 Hour<br />
50 o C (120 o C)<br />
48 Hour<br />
50 o C (120 o C)<br />
*Though full cure occurs in seconds, adhesion to glass optimizes in about an hour