11.04.2014 Views

Linear Algebra Exercises-n-Answers.pdf

Linear Algebra Exercises-n-Answers.pdf

Linear Algebra Exercises-n-Answers.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66 <strong>Linear</strong> <strong>Algebra</strong>, by Hefferon<br />

But there is an upper bound (other than the size of the matrices). In general, rank(A + B) ≤<br />

rank(A) + rank(B).<br />

To prove this, note that Gaussian elimination can be performed on A + B in either of two ways:<br />

we can first add A to B and then apply the appropriate sequence of reduction steps<br />

(A + B) step 1<br />

−→ · · · step k<br />

−→ echelon form<br />

or we can get the same results by performing step 1 through step k separately on A and B, and then<br />

adding. The largest rank that we can end with in the second case is clearly the sum of the ranks.<br />

(The matrices above give examples of both possibilities, rank(A + B) < rank(A) + rank(B) and<br />

rank(A + B) = rank(A) + rank(B), happening.)<br />

Subsection Two.III.4: Combining Subspaces<br />

Two.III.4.20 With each of these we can apply Lemma 4.15.<br />

(a) Yes. The plane is the sum of this W 1 and W 2 because for any scalars a and b<br />

( ( ) (<br />

a a − b b<br />

= +<br />

b)<br />

0 b)<br />

shows that the general vector is a sum of vectors from the two parts. And, these two subspaces are<br />

(different) lines through the origin, and so have a trivial intersection.<br />

(b) Yes. To see that any vector in the plane is a combination of vectors from these parts, consider<br />

this relationship. ( ( ) ( )<br />

a 1 1<br />

= c<br />

b)<br />

1 + c<br />

1 2<br />

1.1<br />

We could now simply note that the set<br />

( ( )<br />

1 1<br />

{ , }<br />

1)<br />

1.1<br />

is a basis for the space (because it is clearly linearly independent, and has size two in R 2 ), and thus<br />

ther is one and only one solution to the above equation, implying that all decompositions are unique.<br />

Alternatively, we can solve<br />

c 1 + c 2 = a −ρ 1+ρ 2 c −→ 1 + c 2 = a<br />

c 1 + 1.1c 2 = b<br />

0.1c 2 = −a + b<br />

to get that c 2 = 10(−a + b) and c 1 = 11a − 10b, and so we have<br />

( ( ) ( )<br />

a 11a − 10b −10a + 10b<br />

=<br />

+<br />

b)<br />

11a − 10b 1.1 · (−10a + 10b)<br />

as required. As with the prior answer, each of the two subspaces is a line through the origin, and<br />

their intersection is trivial.<br />

(c) Yes. Each vector in the plane is a sum in this way<br />

( ( (<br />

x x 0<br />

= +<br />

y)<br />

y)<br />

0)<br />

and the intersection of the two subspaces is trivial.<br />

(d) No. The intersection is not trivial.<br />

(e) No. These are not subspaces.<br />

Two.III.4.21 With each of these we can use Lemma 4.15.<br />

(a) Any vector in R 3 can be decomposed as this sum.<br />

⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞<br />

x x 0<br />

⎝y⎠ = ⎝y⎠ + ⎝0⎠<br />

z 0 z<br />

And, the intersection of the xy-plane and the z-axis is the trivial subspace.<br />

(b) Any vector in R 3 can be decomposed as<br />

⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞<br />

⎝ x y⎠ = ⎝ x − z<br />

y − z⎠ + ⎝ z z⎠<br />

z 0 z<br />

and the intersection of the two spaces is trivial.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!