Linear Algebra Exercises-n-Answers.pdf
Linear Algebra Exercises-n-Answers.pdf
Linear Algebra Exercises-n-Answers.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Answers</strong> to <strong>Exercises</strong> 201<br />
So in the nontrivial case the minimal polynomial must be of degree at least one. A zero map or<br />
matrix has minimal polynomial m(x) = x, and an identity map or matrix has minimal polynomial<br />
m(x) = x − 1.<br />
Five.IV.1.26 The polynomial can be read geometrically to say “a 60 ◦ rotation minus two rotations of<br />
30 ◦ equals the identity.”<br />
Five.IV.1.27<br />
For a diagonal matrix<br />
⎛<br />
⎞<br />
t 1,1 0<br />
0 t 2,2 T = ⎜<br />
⎝<br />
. ..<br />
⎟<br />
⎠<br />
t n,n<br />
the characteristic polynomial is (t 1,1 − x)(t 2,2 − x) · · · (t n,n − x). Of course, some of those factors may<br />
be repeated, e.g., the matrix might have t 1,1 = t 2,2 . For instance, the characteristic polynomial of<br />
⎛ ⎞<br />
3 0 0<br />
D = ⎝0 3 0⎠<br />
0 0 1<br />
is (3 − x) 2 (1 − x) = −1 · (x − 3) 2 (x − 1).<br />
To form the minimal polynomial, take the terms x − t i,i , throw out repeats, and multiply them<br />
together. For instance, the minimal polynomial of D is (x − 3)(x − 1). To check this, note first<br />
that Theorem 1.8, the Cayley-Hamilton theorem, requires that each linear factor in the characteristic<br />
polynomial appears at least once in the minimal polynomial. One way to check the other direction —<br />
that in the case of a diagonal matrix, each linear factor need appear at most once — is to use a matrix<br />
argument. A diagonal matrix, multiplying from the left, rescales rows by the entry on the diagonal.<br />
But in a product (T − t 1,1 I) · · · , even without any repeat factors, every row is zero in at least one of<br />
the factors.<br />
For instance, in the product<br />
⎛<br />
(D − 3I)(D − 1I) = (D − 3I)(D − 1I)I = ⎝ 0 0 0<br />
⎞ ⎛<br />
0 0 0 ⎠ ⎝ 2 0 0<br />
⎞ ⎛<br />
0 2 0⎠<br />
⎝ 1 0 0<br />
⎞<br />
0 1 0⎠<br />
0 0 −2 0 0 0 0 0 1<br />
because the first and second rows of the first matrix D − 3I are zero, the entire product will have a<br />
first row and second row that are zero. And because the third row of the middle matrix D − 1I is zero,<br />
the entire product has a third row of zero.<br />
Five.IV.1.28 This subsection starts with the observation that the powers of a linear transformation<br />
cannot climb forever without a “repeat”, that is, that for some power n there is a linear relationship<br />
c n · t n + · · · + c 1 · t + c 0 · id = z where z is the zero transformation. The definition of projection is<br />
that for such a map one linear relationship is quadratic, t 2 − t = z. To finish, we need only consider<br />
whether this relationship might not be minimal, that is, are there projections for which the minimal<br />
polynomial is constant or linear?<br />
For the minimal polynomial to be constant, the map would have to satisfy that c 0 · id = z, where<br />
c 0 = 1 since the leading coefficient of a minimal polynomial is 1. This is only satisfied by the zero<br />
transformation on a trivial space. This is indeed a projection, but not a very interesting one.<br />
For the minimal polynomial of a transformation to be linear would give c 1 · t + c 0 · id = z where<br />
c 1 = 1. This equation gives t = −c 0 · id. Coupling it with the requirement that t 2 = t gives<br />
t 2 = (−c 0 ) 2 · id = −c 0 · id, which gives that c 0 = 0 and t is the zero transformation or that c 0 = 1 and<br />
t is the identity.<br />
Thus, except in the cases where the projection is a zero map or an identity map, the minimal<br />
polynomial is m(x) = x 2 − x.<br />
Five.IV.1.29 (a) This is a property of functions in general, not just of linear functions. Suppose<br />
that f and g are one-to-one functions such that f ◦ g is defined. Let f ◦ g(x 1 ) = f ◦ g(x 2 ), so that<br />
f(g(x 1 )) = f(g(x 2 )). Because f is one-to-one this implies that g(x 1 ) = g(x 2 ). Because g is also<br />
one-to-one, this in turn implies that x 1 = x 2 . Thus, in summary, f ◦ g(x 1 ) = f ◦ g(x 2 ) implies that<br />
x 1 = x 2 and so f ◦ g is one-to-one.<br />
(b) If the linear map h is not one-to-one then there are unequal vectors ⃗v 1 , ⃗v 2 that map to the same<br />
value h(⃗v 1 ) = h(⃗v 2 ). Because h is linear, we have ⃗0 = h(⃗v 1 ) − h(⃗v 2 ) = h(⃗v 1 − ⃗v 2 ) and so ⃗v 1 − ⃗v 2 is<br />
a nonzero vector from the domain that is mapped by h to the zero vector of the codomain (⃗v 1 − ⃗v 2<br />
does not equal the zero vector of the domain because ⃗v 1 does not equal ⃗v 2 ).