10.04.2014 Views

Network News - Winter 2009/2010 (PDF 3.7Mb - Canadian Breast ...

Network News - Winter 2009/2010 (PDF 3.7Mb - Canadian Breast ...

Network News - Winter 2009/2010 (PDF 3.7Mb - Canadian Breast ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Controversy about<br />

Mammography<br />

Screening… Again<br />

By Jackie Manthorne, Executive Director<br />

Those of you who have been<br />

involved in the breast cancer<br />

community will know that every<br />

so often, the value of mammography<br />

and breast self-examination (BSE) is<br />

questioned, much to the consternation<br />

and often anger of women who<br />

found their lumps by faithfully doing<br />

BSE or through a regular screening<br />

mammogram.<br />

This time, it was the United States<br />

Preventive Services Task Force<br />

(USPSTF), which in November <strong>2009</strong><br />

issued new recommendations:<br />

“The USPSTF recommends against<br />

routine screening mammography<br />

in women aged 40 to 49 years. The<br />

decision to start regular, biennial<br />

screening mammography before the<br />

age of 50 years should be an individual<br />

one and take patient context into<br />

account, including the patient’s values<br />

regarding specific benefits and harms.<br />

“In addition:<br />

• The USPSTF recommends biennial<br />

screening mammography for<br />

women aged 50 to 74 years<br />

• The USPSTF concludes that the<br />

current evidence is insufficient to<br />

assess the additional benefits and<br />

harms of screening mammography<br />

in women 75 years or older<br />

• The USPSTF recommends against<br />

teaching breast self-examination<br />

(BSE)<br />

• The USPSTF concludes that the<br />

current evidence is insufficient to<br />

assess the additional benefits and<br />

harms of clinical breast examination<br />

(CBE) beyond screening<br />

mammography in women 40 years<br />

or older<br />

• The USPSTF concludes that the<br />

current evidence is insufficient<br />

to assess the additional benefits<br />

and harms of either digital<br />

mammography or magnetic<br />

resonance imaging (MRI) instead<br />

of film mammography as screening<br />

modalities for breast cancer 1 “<br />

Some of this we have heard before;<br />

meta-analyses and studies have been<br />

published and publicized in the last<br />

few decades. Indeed, CBCN has<br />

responded many times through its<br />

own media releases and CBCN Board<br />

presidents and other Directors have<br />

been interviewed dozens of times<br />

about these two issues.<br />

On November 19, <strong>2009</strong>, CBCN<br />

issued the following media<br />

release in response to the USPSTF<br />

recommendations:<br />

”<strong>Canadian</strong> <strong>Breast</strong> Cancer <strong>Network</strong><br />

speaks out against the finding of the<br />

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force<br />

(USPSTF) Recommendations on<br />

<strong>Breast</strong> Screening<br />

“Women from 40-49 should not<br />

receive routine mammograms for early<br />

detection of breast cancer according to<br />

the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force<br />

(USPSTF). The panel of doctors and<br />

researchers, which does not include<br />

oncologists, advises women to begin<br />

regular screening every two years at<br />

1 Screening for <strong>Breast</strong> Cancer<br />

Recommendation Statement, US<br />

Preventive Services Task Force,<br />

http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf09/breastcancer/brcanrs.htm<br />

<strong>Network</strong> <strong>News</strong> <strong>Winter</strong> <strong>2009</strong>-10 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!