Download - Kier Group

Considerate Constructors Scheme 

performance review 

Second half 2012 

2013 Code and Checklist 

CONSTRUCTORS 

CONSIDERATE

02 Introduction 

03 2013 Code and Checklist 

11 Kier Group performance from July to December 2012/ Scores above the industry average 

12 Second/third visit analysis 

13 Best practice and below average performance by category 

15 Kier Group companies performance in second half 2012 - site reports 

21 Two of the best 

22 CCS co-ordinators 

Kier Group plc 

Considerate Constructors Scheme performance review - second half 2012 

01

Introduction 

Paul Sheffield 

Chief Executive 


Alan Smith 

Director of Corporate 

Communications 


I am pleased to be ending yet another year of associate 

membership under the Scheme on a positive note 

with the Group’s monthly performance remaining at 

a consistently high mark. I would like to extend my 

thanks to everyone who is involved in maintaining 

such high standards - it truly is an achievement that 

you should all be proud of. 

As you will see from these pages, the Scheme has 

introduced major changes to its Code, Checklist and 

scoring system, and I encourage all of you to study 

this document and the CCS website to ensure that you 

have a full understanding of how these changes will 

affect you and your site. Only with your co-operation 

can we ensure that this new scoring system is fully 

adopted and understood by all those operatives who 

go that extra mile to ensure that Kier consistently 

performs at a level that is way beyond compliance. 

Although the new documentation marks major changes 

in the way the Scheme now monitors registered sites, 

it is important to remember that its aim is still the 

same and that is to ensure that registered sites and 

companies are improving the image of construction. 

I have no doubt that this new system will be fully 

implemented by all Kier sites and personnel - allowing 

the Group to maintain the trend of achieving scores well 

above the industry average. In turn, this will ensure 

that we remain respected by both our competitors and 

customers alike - further cementing our reptuation 

as one of the most considerate constructors in the 

industry. 

Welcome to the second CCS review of 2012. I would 

like to begin by congratulating everyone on another 

fantastic year – these last six months have seen yet 

another rise in Kier’s average monthly scores with the 

Group hitting an all-time high of 35.73 out of 40.00 

in October. Not only have our sites been achieving 

top scores in all the eight categories under the Code 

of Considerate Practice, but we are also beating the 

industry benchmark by at least 1.25 points every 

month. With the CCS introducing more stringent 

marking criteria in 2012 it was pleasing to see that 

the Group managed to maintain a high standard of 

performance – showing that its sites are consistently 

improving and meeting these new challenges head on. 

As you may already be aware, from 1 January the 

CCS has completely overhauled its Code of Practice, 

supporting Checklist, marking system and Monitor’s 

Report. The once eight-point Code has now been 

reduced to a five-point document under which sites 

and companies will be assessed. This means that 

even if a site was originally registered under the old 

system, the new scoring method will be used from this 

point onwards. It is therefore vitally important that 

all staff responsible for their project’s/company’s CCS 

performance are up to speed with these changes so 

that we can maintain our reputation as considerate 

constructors. 

Throughout these pages, as well as reporting on the 

last six months data, there will be copies of the new 

documentation the Scheme is now using to assess 

sites and companies. Please make sure that you 

and your colleagues familiarise yourselves with this 

material and get to grips with the new five points of 

the Code of Considerate Practice as well as the tenpoint 

scoring system. 

If you feel you need further clarification on how this 

new system operates the CCS offers a number of 

seminars and workshops which offer guidance and 

support. Details of how to sign up can be found on 

www.ccscheme.org.uk. 

Once again please ensure that this document is 

filtered down through the businesses so that all those 

involved with the CCS have access to a copy. 



02

2013 Code and Checklist 

The Considerate Constructors Scheme has 

now launched a new five-point Code of 

Considerate Practice, supporting Checklist, 

scoring system and Monitor Reports. From 

the 1 January 2013, all registered sites and 

companies will be assessed on this new Code 

and the scheme monitors will be using the 

new supporting Checklist when assessing 

registered sites and companies, and will 

be reporting and scoring the visit using the 

revised formats. All monitor visits taking 

place after the 1 January 2013 will be 

on the new five-point Code, even if a 

first visit was assessed on the eightpoint 

version. 

Though the Code has been updated to 

remain aligned with the industry’s values, 

it is important to remember that the aim 

remains the same. The Scheme is still looking 

to see how registered sites and companies 

are improving the image of construction. 

Code of Considerate Practice 

The new Code is now in five parts and is 

no longer a narrative, but a series of bullet 

points. Each section of the Code contains 

an aspirational supporting statement and 

four bullet points which represent the 

basic expectations of registration with the 

Scheme. 

The new Code of Considerate Practice 

applies to all registered sites and companies, 

regardless of size, type or location. 

Monitor’s Checklist 

Like the Code, the new Checklist is made up of five sections with ten questions in each section. The four bold, 

closed questions are aligned to the four bullet points of the Code, and allow the monitor to establish whether 

the site or company has achieved compliance with the Scheme. The six non-bold, open questions directly 

support the bold questions by asking ‘what’ is being done and ‘how’ things are being addressed to meet and 

exceed the required standards. 

The Code of Considerate Practice details the Scheme’s requirements and the Checklist’s bold 

questions establish if a site or company is meeting these requirements. The Checklist’s non-bold 

questions then ask ‘how’ these requirements are being met or exceeded. 

Each question in the Checklist is now supported by a number of ‘prompts’ and these indicate specific items 

the monitor may consider when establishing whether the site or company has met the expectations of that 

Checklist question. It is important to note that this list of prompts is not exhaustive and inevitably other items 

will need to be considered. 

It is important to understand that the prompts are just that – prompts. They are on the Checklist to indicate 

the kind of issues that the monitor will be looking at within that question, but they are not a ‘sub checklist of 

requirements’. Some will apply on all sites while others won’t – it is down to the monitor to look at the size, 

type and location of the site, and use his or her judgement to decide what is expected. 



03

Continued... 

The prompts can also be used by site managers to understand the questions but, as above, the list is not 

exhaustive and simply addressing each prompt will not necessarily provide a high score. We expect sites to 

use their initiative to decide what they can and should do to achieve the expectations of the Scheme. 

Monitors will use their discretion when assessing whether questions or prompts are relevant. Where they are 

not, they will not be considered when assessing performance or awarding a score. Monitors will decide whether 

a question has been adequately addressed taking into account the size, type and location of the site or 

company, as well as the context of the project. Credit will not be given for activities that are planned but have 

yet to be carried out. 

The additional questions detailed on the final page of the Checklist are for data gathering purposes only and 

the responses to these questions will have no impact upon the score awarded. 


Site Registration Monitors’ Checklist 

This checklist should be used as a basis for discussions that complement direct observations by the Monitor. 

Questions marked in bold directly reflect the Scheme’s Code of Considerate Practice and must have been satisfactorily 

addressed to achieve a ‘compliant’ score. 

The Checklist contains a number of prompts that highlight specific areas the Monitor may take into consideration when 

reviewing that question. Monitors will only look at the activities of the site during the construction phase. 

Monitors will use their discretion when assessing whether questions or prompts are relevant. Where they are not, they 

will not be considered when assessing performance or awarding a score. Monitors will decide whether a question has 

been adequately addressed taking into account the size, type and location of the site. Credit will not be given for 

activities that are planned but have yet to be carried out. 

Site ID number Visit No. Date 

Brief description of the work, site location and context, anything ‘sensitive’, type of contract and other relevant matters 

1. Enhancing the APPEARANCE 

Constructors should ensure sites appear professional and well managed. 

1.1 Does the external appearance of the First impressions, signage, fencing, obstructions, mud, debris, litter 

site present a positive image of the 

industry? 

1.2 Does the site appear well organised, Tidiness, organisation, entrance 

clean and tidy? 

1.3 Does the appearance of all facilities, Screening of facilities, remote compounds 

stored materials, vehicles and plant make 

a positive impression? 

1.4 Does the appearance of the workforce Dress code, smoking 

project a positive impression? 

1.5 What actions are taken to keep the Inspection, public rubbish, access roads, dust prevention 

perimeter and surrounding areas clean, tidy 

and free of litter, mud and dust? 

1.6 What arrangements are in place to Site waste, litter, debris, viewing points, graffiti, vandalism 

ensure that the public and visitors see a site 

that is organised, clean and tidy? 

1.7 How are site facilities, compounds, waste Supervision, procedures 

and storage areas cleaned, managed and 

maintained? 

1.8 How does the site encourage the 

Workforce awareness, involvement 

workforce to contribute to cleanliness and 

good housekeeping? 

1.9 How is smoking managed to avoid a Guidance, discrete areas, ashtrays 

negative impact on the public? 

1.10 How are company values and corporate Branding guidelines, signage, websites, communications 

identity promoted? 

2. Respecting the COMMUNITY 

Constructors should give utmost consideration to their impact on neighbours and the public. 

2.1 Are all those affected by the work 

identified, notified and kept informed and 

shown courtesy and respect? 

Pre-start information, company contact information, complaints procedures, 

updates, sensitivity to neighbours, special needs 

Version 1 (January 2013) Page 1 



04

Continued... 

2.2 Are all reasonable efforts being made 

to minimise the impact of deliveries, 

parking and work on the public highway 

and footpaths? 

2.3 Is the site contributing to and 

supporting the local community and 

businesses? 

2.4 Is the site actively working to create a 

positive impression by promoting the 

site’s registration with the Scheme and 

displaying Scheme banners and posters? 

2.5 How does the site ensure that all those 

affected, including visitors, are treated with 

consideration, courtesy and respect? 

2.6 How is nuisance and intrusion 

minimised? 

2.7 How are compliments, comments and 

complaints sought, recorded and managed? 

2.8 What is being done to support and 

contribute to the local community including 

promoting local employment? 

2.9 How do company directors, senior 

managers, clients and consultants assist the 

site in meeting the requirements of the 

Code? 

2.10 What is being done to leave a positive 

and lasting impression of the industry on 

completion of the project? 

Routes, timings, unloading, public diversions, utility works 

Community liaison, local shops, trade contractors 

Workforce and public, inductions, toolbox talks, newsletters 

Local and special needs, operative conduct and behaviour, induction and 

training 

Noise, privacy, outlook, radios, phones, cameras, parking and obstruction 

24/7 contact information, regular reviews 

Corporate Social Responsibility policy, creating opportunities, schools, 

businesses, residents 

Scheme champions, CCS briefing and action plan, meeting agendas, 

management review 

Co-operation, support, goodwill, legacy 

3. Protecting the ENVIRONMENT 

Constructors should protect and enhance the environment. 

3.1 Are environmental issues identified, 

communicated, managed and promoted? 

3.2 Is waste avoided and the use of 

resources and energy minimised? 


to minimise the impact of vibration and of 

air, light and noise pollution? 


to protect the existing ecology, the 

landscape and water courses? 

3.5 How are environmental issues identified 

and managed? 

3.6 How are environmental issues 

communicated and promoted to the 

workforce and the general public? 

3.7 How is the site measuring and minimising 

its use of natural resources including water? 

3.8 How is the site measuring and reporting 

its carbon footprint and what is being done to 

reduce it? 

3.9 How is vibration, and air, light and noise 

pollution measured and managed to minimise 

impact? 

3.10 How is a positive contribution being 

made to the natural environment? 

Environmental policy statement displayed, site specifics, induction, waste 

management plan, workforce, supply chain 

Policy, reducing, reusing and recycling, sustainable solutions 

Working methods and equipment, programming, noise monitoring 

Birds, trees, plants and wildlife, river, hazardous substance storage, spill 

control 

Management policy, training, specialist input, planning, monitoring 

Newsletter, notice board, local groups, consultation, involvement, promoting 

achievements 

Recycling, sustainable sources, policy, implementation, water/energy saving 

measures, harvesting rainwater, offsite construction, prefabrication 

Carbon footprint reporting tools, report to company level, energy and fuel use 

minimised, eco cabins, signage, travel plans, green purchasing 

Noise monitoring, lighting, dust, fumes, working methods 

Awareness, goodwill work, planting, landscaping, local materials, 

improvements, post completion impact 




05

Continued... 

4. Securing everyone’s SAFETY 

Constructors should attain the highest levels of safety performance. 

Note that the Code addresses the safety systems in place. The safety of the working site is outside the Code and the monitoring 

process. 

4.1 Are systems in place that care for the First aid, A&E, safety plan updated, inspections, risk information, PPE, 

safety of the public, visitors and 

protected access to cabins, controlled access 

workforce? 

4.2 Have security risks to neighbours and Site security, scaffold protected, traffic management, protection 

the public been considered and 

addressed? 

4.3 Are initiatives in place to ensure Workforce consultation and information, training 

continuous safety improvements? 

4.4 Does the site encourage attitudes and Management, supervision, induction 

behaviours that enhance safety 

performance? 

4.5 How is the safety of the public outside the Falling debris, roads, footpaths and diversions, barriers, lighting 

site addressed and monitored? 

4.6 What arrangements are in place for Emergency procedures, medical info 

dealing effectively with emergencies? 

4.7 What is done to ensure that the 

Vehicle protection, warning systems, sensors, speed limits, supervision 

movement of vehicles and plant outside the 

site is not a risk to pedestrians, cyclists and 

other road users? 

4.8 How are accidents, incidents and near Recording, analysing, communicating, training 

misses recorded, and what is done to learn 

from them? 

4.9 How does the site provide current safety Hazard board, daily briefing 

and risk information to operatives and 

visitors? 

4.10 How does the site embed a culture of Attitudes, behaviour, incentives, controls, CSCS cards for visitors 

continuous positive safety performance? 

5. Caring for the WORKFORCE 

Constructors should provide a supportive and caring working environment. 

5.1 Does the site demonstrate a 

Harassment, male, female, mobility impaired, age 

commitment to respect, fair treatment, 

encouragement and support? 

5.2 Are personal development needs Training – directly employed, supply chain, trade contractors 

identified and is training promoted? 

5.3 Does the site care for the health and Occupational health risks assessed, drugs and alcohol, contact details, 

wellbeing of the workforce? 

medical conditions, medications 

5.4 Are suitable, hygienic and well 

Changing, drying, toilets, showers, lockers, kitchen 

maintained welfare facilities provided 

within a reasonable distance of the work 

area? 

5.5 How does the site assess and monitor CSCS, skills cards 

the competency of the workforce? 

5.6 How does the company encourage new Careers advice, apprenticeships, placements 

people into the industry? 

5.7 How is the health and wellbeing of the Posters, healthy lifestyle advice, weather protection 

workforce assessed and addressed? 

5.8 How is the site providing for the needs of 

a diverse workforce regardless of gender, 

age, religion or ability? 

5.9 How are the welfare facilities managed 

and what additional facilities are available? 

5.10 What is done to ensure that the 

workforce feels involved and is encouraged 

to provide feedback? 

Separate changing rooms, ramps, cultural needs, literacy and numeracy 

training 

Cleaning regime, rest, exercise and recreation 

Open door policy, recognition, reward, feedback/consultation 




06

Continued... 

Additional Information 

Innovation 

What measures have been implemented on the project that demonstrate innovation and original thinking? 

Site Specific Data 

This information is used to capture key information and identify trends within the industry 

Please note that data should be gathered on the current registration period only 

What is the average number of operatives? 

Of these, how many on average are women? 

What percentage of the workforce holds CSCS cards? % 

How many compliments have been received and recorded by the site? 

How many complaints have been received and recorded by the site? 

How many reportable accidents have there been? 

How many non-reportable accidents have there been? 

Have there been any fatalities on site? 

Does the site record environmental incidents 

If yes, how many have there been? 

Site Manager Feedback 

Does the Site Manager have any comments, questions or suggestions for the Scheme? 

Y / N 

Notes 




07

Continued... 

Scoring explained 

The 2013 Checklist contains five sections each containing a number of bold ‘compliance’ questions, and a number of non-bold 

‘beyond compliance’ questions. Each section of the 2013 checklist is scored out of ten points, with a score of five indicating 

compliance. All questions highlighted in bold on the checklist must be satisfactorily addressed in order for the site to achieve 

compliance in that section. Sites are not only assessed for compliance, but also to identify measures taken which are above 

and beyond these requirements, and addressing the non-bold questions on the Checklist may result in a higher score. 

Monitors will use their discretion when assessing whether questions or prompts are relevant. Where they are not, they will 

not be considered when assessing performance or awarding a score. Monitors will decide whether a question has been 

adequately addressed taking into account the size, type and location of the site, as well as the context and value of the project. Credit 

will not be given for activities that are planned but have yet to be carried out. 


Site Scoring 

Each section of the Checklist is scored out of 10 points, with a score of 5 indicating compliance. 

Questions highlighted in bold on the Checklist must be satisfactorily addressed in order for the site to achieve 

compliance and this indicates that a site has reached a standard beyond statutory requirements. Sites are not only 

assessed for compliance, but also to identify measures taken which are above and beyond these requirements, 

and addressing the non-bolded questions on the Checklist may result in a higher score. 

The score awarded reflects the Monitor’s opinion on how the site is performing based on what they see at 

the time of the visit and their discussion with the Site Manager. 

In any one section, a project’s performance is assessed using the following performance descriptors. 

Descriptor Explanation of score descriptor Score 

Gross failure 

A letter highlighting the gross failure(s) will be sent with a request for a meeting at the company's office to 

discuss the issue(s) detailed in the Monitor’s report. A further site visit will be required so that the Monitor 

can establish that compliance has been achieved. Failure to address the issue(s) may result in the site’s 

removal from the Scheme. 

1 

Failure 

Major non 

compliance 

Minor non 

compliance 

Compliance 

Good 

A letter highlighting the failure(s) will be sent with a request for the site to address the issue(s) detailed in 

the Monitor’s report. A further visit will then be required so that the Monitor can establish that compliance 

has been achieved. Failure to address the issue(s) may result in the site’s removal from the Scheme. 

A letter highlighting the major non-compliance(s) will be sent with a request for the site to address the 

issue(s) detailed in the Monitor’s report. A Monitor revisit will be arranged or evidence will be required to 

establish that the non-compliant issue(s) has been addressed. 

A letter highlighting the minor non-compliance(s) will be sent with a request for the site to address the 

issue(s) detailed in the Monitor’s report. 

The site has satisfactorily addressed all bold items on the Monitors’ Checklist which demonstrates that they 

are adhering to the minimum requirements of the Scheme’s Code. 

The site has satisfactorily addressed all bold items on the Monitors’ Checklist and has also undertaken 

additional measures to address some of the non-bolded questions demonstrating that they are performing 

to a good standard beyond the minimum requirements of the Scheme’s Code. 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

Very good 

The site is performing well above the minimum requirements of the Scheme’s Code, and has undertaken a 

number of additional measures to address most of the non-bolded questions on the Checklist 

demonstrating that they are performing to a very good standard with a thorough commitment to the 

Scheme’s Code. 

7 

Excellent 

The site has undertaken a significant number of additional measures to address all applicable non-bolded 

questions on the Checklist demonstrating that they are performing to an excellent standard and showing a 

real commitment to improving the image of construction. 

8 

Exceptional 

The site is at the forefront of industry best practice demonstrating the very highest level of achievement far 

above the minimum standards required by the Scheme’s Code and has addressed all questions on the 

Checklist to the highest standards. 

9 

Innovative 

The site, beyond being exceptional, has introduced innovative practices or thinking that goes far beyond 

the expectations of the Scheme and, as such, is considered to be advancing the standards by which the 

image of the industry is judged. 

10 

While an innovative activity is required to achieve a score of 10 in any section, such activities will be recorded regardless of score. When 

recorded on a visit where a score of 10 has not been achieved, the activity may count towards achieving a 10 score on subsequent visits. 

An innovative activity will only count once towards a 10 score unless it is further developed and improved. 

Version 1 (January 2013) 



02 08

Continued... 

Any site which fails to adequately address all bold compliance questions in a section to the monitor’s satisfaction will be awarded a 

non-compliant score for that section, regardless of any other positive activities or initiatives undertaken relevant to that section. The 

non-compliant score is awarded depending on the nature and severity of the issues identified and taking into account the required 

course of action. Therefore, when awarding a section a non-compliant score, consideration will be given to the expected course of 

action though it is still the nature of the issue itself which will dictate the score. 


Company Scoring 

Each section of the Checklist is scored out of 10 points, with a score of 5 indicating compliance. 

Questions highlighted in bold on the Checklist must be satisfactorily addressed in order for the company to achieve 

compliance and this indicates that a company has reached a standard beyond statutory requirements. Companies 

are not only assessed for compliance, but also to identify measures taken which are above and beyond these 

requirements, and addressing the non-bolded questions on the Checklist may result in a higher score. 

The score awarded reflects the Monitor’s opinion on how the company is performing based on what they 

see at the time of the visit and their discussion with the Company Manager. 

In any one section, a project’s performance is assessed using the following performance descriptors. 

Descriptor Explanation of score descriptor Score 

Gross failure 

A letter highlighting the gross failure(s) will be sent with a request for a meeting at the company's office to 

discuss the issue(s) detailed in the Monitor’s report. A further site visit will be required so that the Monitor 

can establish that compliance has been achieved. Failure to address the issue(s) may result in the 

company’s removal from the Scheme. 

1 

Failure 

Major non 

compliance 

Minor non 

compliance 

Compliance 

Good 

A letter highlighting the failure(s) will be sent with a request for the company to address the issue(s) 

detailed in the Monitor’s report. A further visit will then be required so that the Monitor can establish that 

compliance has been achieved. Failure to address the issue(s) may result in the company’s removal from 

the Scheme. 

A letter highlighting the major non-compliance(s) will be sent with a request for the company to address the 

issue(s) detailed in the Monitor’s report. A Monitor revisit will be arranged or evidence will be required to 

establish that the non-compliant issue(s) has been addressed. 

A letter highlighting the minor non-compliance(s) will be sent with a request for the company to address the 

issue(s) detailed in the Monitor’s report. 

The company has satisfactorily addressed all bold items on the Monitors’ Checklist which demonstrates 

that they are adhering to the minimum requirements of the Scheme’s Code. 

The company has satisfactorily addressed all bold items on the Monitors’ Checklist and has also 

undertaken additional measures to address some of the non-bolded questions demonstrating that they are 

performing to a good standard beyond the minimum requirements of the Scheme’s Code of Considerate 

Practice. 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

Very good 

The company is performing well above the minimum requirements of the Scheme’s Code, and has 

undertaken a number of additional measures to address most of the non-bolded questions on the Checklist 

demonstrating that they are performing to a very good standard with a thorough commitment to the 

Scheme’s Code. 

7 

Excellent 

The company has undertaken a significant number of additional measures to address all applicable nonbolded 

questions on the Checklist demonstrating that they are performing to an excellent standard and 

showing a real commitment to improving the image of construction. 

8 

Exceptional 

The company is at the forefront of industry best practice demonstrating the very highest level of 

achievement far above the minimum standards required by the Scheme’s Code and has addressed all 

questions on the Checklist to the highest standards. 

9 

Innovative 

The company, beyond being exceptional, has introduced innovative practices or thinking that goes far 

beyond the expectations of the Scheme and, as such, is considered to be advancing the standards by 

which the image of the industry is judged. 

10 

While an innovative activity is required to achieve a score of 10 in any section, such activities will be recorded regardless of score. When 

recorded on a visit where a score of 10 has not been achieved, the activity may count towards achieving a 10 score on subsequent visits. 

An innovative activity will only count once towards a 10 score unless it is further developed and improved. 



09

Kier Group performance from July to December 2012 

The graph below shows the Kier Group average scores over the last year compared directly with industry average. As you can 

see, the scores increased month on month for the first six months and after taking a dip in July the Group reached an all time high 

monthly average score of 35.73 out of 40.00. 

36 

36 

31 

35 

26 

34 

21 

33 

16 

11 

Industry average 

Kier Group average 

No. of registrations 

32 

6 

1 

31 

Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 

-4 

Scores above the industry average 

Kier points above industry average 

As 3 a Group we consistently outperform the industry and since July have beaten their scores by at least 1.25 points every month 

(as show in the graph below). 

2.5 

2 

1.5 

Kier points above industry average 

1 

0.5 

0 

July August September October November December 



10

Second/third visit analysis 

The following tables demonstrate how over the last six months our sites have managed to improve their scores from their first 

inspection and monitor’s reports to their second and third inspections (with a few exceptions). It demonstrates how important it is 

for projects to take into account and utilise the comments and feedback made by monitors on first visits. 

Please ensure then once the monitor’s report has been received, that this is discussed and analysed to identify areas for improvement. 

If you require ideas on how to enhance certain categories please contact Lauren.jones@kier.co.uk. 

July 2012 

25 projects with second/third visits 

8 projects improved with overall scores raised by 13.0 

14 projects remained the same 

3 projects had a lower score reducing the overall scores by 1.5 

Overall points 

gained by 

second visits 

11.5 

August 2012 






gained by 

second visits 

11.5 

September 2012 






gained by 

second visits 

8.5 

October 2012 




0 projects had a lower score 


gained by 

second visits 

7.5 

November 2012 






gained by 

second visits 

8.0 

December 2012 






gained by 

second visits 

2.0 



11

Best practice and below average performance by category 

The following three tables examine Kier’s performance under the eight individual categories in the Scheme’s Code of Considerate 

Practice. The table below shows that Safety has the highest average throughout the second half of 2012 which is reassuring to 

see. The safety of Kier’s employees and the public is of utmost importance and to know the Group as a whole is consistently 

performing well in this area is encouraging. 

Average performance figures: July to December 2012 

Order by 

performance 

Category 

Average 

score 

July 

2012 

Average 

score 

Aug 

2012 

Average 

score 

Sept 

2012 

Average 

score 

Oct 

2012 

Average 

score 

Nov 

2012 

Average 

score 

Dec 

2012 

Average 

score 

Second half 

2012 

1) Safety 4.39 4.47 4.45 4.55 4.30 4.47 4.44 

2) 

A Good 

Neighbour 

4.29 4.39 4.50 4.50 4.38 4.41 4.41 

3) Accountable 4.24 4.45 4.47 4.48 4.38 4.41 4.40 

4) Considerate 4.37 4.41 4.39 4.47 4.35 4.41 4.40 

5) Responsible 4.34 4.38 4.39 4.48 4.39 4.40 4.39 

6) Appearance 4.21 4.39 4.44 4.45 4.36 4.41 4.37 

7) Respectful 4.29 4.33 4.36 4.43 4.30 4.40 4.35 

8) Environment 4.26 4.41 4.34 4.37 4.20 4.29 4.34 

Overall average 

per month 

4.30 4.40 4.42 4.47 4.33 4.40 4.39 



12

Continued... 

The table below shows clearly how the Group has performed in individual categories and clearly highlights those areas we are 

performing well in and those we are failing to. A Good Neighbour received the most 5.0 out of 5.0 scores which indicates that our 

sites are having a positive influence on the communities they operate in and that Kier is interacting proactively with its neighbours. 

Considerate recived the least amount of 5.0 out of 5.0s 

Best results July to December 2012 

5.0 score Total 

Considerate 

Environment 

Appearance 

A Good Neighbour 

Respectful 

Safe 

Responsible 

Accountable 

July 1 1 1 1 1 5 

August 2 3 

2 2 1 10 

September 1 6 1 

4 2 14 

October 2 2 4 1 4 3 1 17 

November 1 1 

1 2 1 6 

December 6 2 1 4 

13 

Second half 2012 1 4 3 21 5 9 16 7 65 

Average or below average results for July to December 2012 

3.0 or below 

Considerate 

Environment 

Appearance 

A Good Neighbour 

Respectful 

Safe 

Responsible 

Accountable 

Total 

July 1 2 1 1 

2 7 

August 1 1 

September 1 1 

October 0 

November 0 

December 1 1 

First half 2012 1 1 2 2 1 0 1 2 10 



13

Kier Group companies performance in second half 2012 

Site reports • July 2012 

Kier company 

CONSTRUCTION 

Kier Construction - Eastern Meadowgate School, Cambridgeshire 35.5 

Manson House, Suffolk 36.0 

St Peter’s Primary School, Essex 35.5 

Ormiston Bushfield Academy, Cambridgeshire 36.5 

Kier Construction - London ECEB, London 33.0 

Lewisham Hospital UCC, London 36.0 

NPSM Theatre reconfiguration, Middlesex 34.5 

St Thomas Hospital, London 35.0 

Kier Construction - Northern Rossendale Leisure, Lancashire 36.5 

Darnall Community Health Centre, 

South Yorkshire 36.0 

Kier Construction - Southern The Hastings Academy, East Sussex 36.0 

The Keep, East Sussex 36.0 

Southampton General Hospital, Hampshire 36.0 

Crawley Magistrates Courts, West Sussex 36.5 

Norfolk Court, Surrey 34.0 

Kier Construction - Western Retail development, Vale of Glamorgan 36.0 

& Wales 

Kier Construction - Central South Woodland Hospital, Northamptoonshire 36.0 

Botnar 2, Oxfordshire 34.5 

Kier Construction - Central Highfield Adolescent Unit, Oxordshire 35.0 

Mount Gilbert School, Shropshire 33.5 

Refurbishment of County Hall, Nottinghamshire 35.0 

Cookley Sebright School, Worcestershire 33.0 

Trent Bridge House refurb, Nottinghamshire 36.0 

Total visits 

23.0 

Average scores 

35.30 

SUPPORT SERVICES 

Kier Building Maintenance Owen Building, South Yorkshire 25.0 

Installation of thermal cladding to external 

walls of BISF properties, Stoke 26.5 

Kier North Tyneside Wallsend Parks, Tyne & Wear 36.0 

Carville refurbishment, Tyne & Wear 36.0 

Sir James Knott Nursery, Tyne & Wear 32.0 

Marden High School, Tyne & Wear 30.5 

Kier Sheffield 

Parkview Lodge sheltered scheme, South 

Yorkshire 33.5 

Total visits 

7.0 


31.36 

PROPERTY 

Kier Homes R5A & R5B, Norfolk 34.5 

North Hykeham, Pavilion Gardens, Lincolnshire 31.5 

Thetford, Norfolk 34.5 

Belvidere Village, Glasgow 35.5 

Kier Partnership Homes Lower Milehouse phase 2, Staffordshire 36.0 

Total visits 

5.0 


34.40 

KIER GROUP AVERAGE 34.39 

INDUSTRY AVERAGE 33.14 



14


Site reports • August 2012 


CONSTRUCTION 

Kier Construction - Infrastructure West Lakes Academy, Cumbria 35.0 

& Overseas 

Kier Construction - Eastern 

Thomas Clarkson Community College, 

Cambridgeshire 36.0 

Tempsford redevelopment, Bedfordshire 35.5 

Hampton College, Norfolk 36.0 

Tudor School, Suffolk 35.5 

Kier Construction - London Queensland Road, London 36.0 

Kier Construction - Northern Blacon Crematorium, Cheshire 35.0 

Kier Construction - Scotland NPA police training facility 35.5 

Kier Construction - Southern Isle of Sheppey Academy, west site, Kent 36.5 

Isle of Sheppey Academy, east site, Kent 36.5 

Kier Construction - Western & Wales Torre Abbey phase 2, Devon 37.5 

Plot G, Millbay, Cornwall 37.0 

Kier Construction - Central South Phase 2A post graduate centre, Bedfordshire 36.0 

Morrisons Houghton Regis, Befordshire 33.0 

Project Edinburgh, Berkshire 36.0 

Nene Park Academy, Cambridgeshire 36.0 

Kier Construction - Central Tudor Grange Academy, Worcestor 36.5 

St James C of E School, Gloucestershire 34.5 

University of Lincoln, Lincolnshire 36.0 

Newport Girls High School, Shropshire 36.5 

Total visits 

20.0 

Average scoes 

35.83 


Kier Building Maintenance Castleford Library, West Yorkshire 35.0 

Owen Building, South Yorkshire 32.0 

Kier North Tyneside Longbenton flats refurbishment, Tyne & Wear 30.0 

Whiteley Lodge First School, Tyne & Wear 30.0 

George Square, Tyne & Wear 32.0 

Kier Sheffield Newgate sheltered scheme, South Yorkshire 36.5 

Total visits 

6.0 


33.58 

PROPERTY 

Kier Homes The Avenue, Stoke Mendeville 35.5 

Connect 21, Cambrisgeshire 34.0 

Kingfisher Court, Lincolnshire 35.0 

Redding Banks, Stirlingshire 36.0 

The Rushes (Elsea Park) Lincolnshire 34.5 

Kier Partnership Homes Higher Lydney Park, Gloucestershire 36.0 

Willow Park, Nottinghamshire 34.0 

Total visits 

7.0 


35.0 





15


Site reports • September 2012 


CONSTRUCTION 

Kier Construction - Major Porjects B3, Camden Civic Centre 36.0 

Kier Construction - Eastern UEA Earlham Hall refurb, Norfolk 35.0 

Kier Construction - London Epsom regeneration, Surrey 36.5 

Francis Coombe Academy, Hertfordshire 36.0 

Kier Construction - Northern Newspaper storage building, West Yorkshire 36.0 

Winsford E-Act Academy, Cheshire 36.0 

GSC Preston (Places for Poeple), Lancashire 36.0 

Barnsley College, South Yorkshire 35.5 

Kier Construction - Scotland Sunderland Travelodge, Tyne & Wear 35.5 

SEBN School, South Lanarkshire 32.5 

Kier Construction - Southern KCC Session House, Kent 33.0 

Norfolk Court, Surrey 36.0 

The St Leonards Academy, East Sussex 36.5 

Pilgrims Cross C of E Primary School, 

Hampshire 35.0 

Maidstone UMU, Kent 36.0 

Kier Construction Western & Wales Barepta Cove, Cornwall 36.5 

Ysgol Gyfun Gwynllyw, Torfaen 37.0 

Retail development, Vale of Glamorgan 36.5 

Site E, Raleigh Avenue 36.5 

Falcon Road School, Devon 36.5 

Kier Construction - Central South Downs School science block, Berkshire 32.5 

Building 910, Babraham Research Campus 35.5 

Kier Construction - Central Plot 2600 Oxford Oxford Park, phase 2, 

Wiltshire 34.0 

Mannington Retail Park, phase 2, Wiltshire 35.0 

Brook Haven, Worcestershire 34.5 

Hole Farm House, Worcestershire 33.5 

Penn Hospital, West Midlands 36.5 

Ashbourne House, Derbyshire 35.0 

Total visits 

28.0 


35.39 


Kier Sheffield Stradbroke Primary School, South Yorkshire 34.0 

Parkview Lodge, South Yorkshire 35.0 

Total visits 

2.0 


34.5 

PROPERTY 

Kier Homes Bowmans Mews, Lincolnshire 34.5 

Kier Partnership Homes Hurcott Road, Worcestershire 36.5 

Total visits 

2.0 


35.34 





16


Site reports • October 2012 


CONSTRUCTION 

Kier Construction - Major Projects Arthouse, London 38.0 

Aylesbury Manor House, Buckinghamshire 36.0 

UCL, Howland Street, London 36.0 

Kier Construction - Infrastructure & Furnes Academy, Cumbria 36.5 

Overseas 

Kier Construction - Eastern City Academy Norwich 35.5 

Stanground College, Cambridgeshire 37.0 

Kier Construction - London Coombe Road pahse 3, Kent 36.0 

Whipps Cross University Hospital, London 36.0 

Menorah School, London 36.5 

Ainsworth House, East Sussex 36.0 

Bell Green retail development, London 35.0 

NPSM Theatre reconfiguration, Middlesex 36.0 

Drapers Academy, Essex 35.5 

Kier Construction - Northern Bolton Green retail development, London 35.0 

HMP Lindholme, South Yorkshire 35.0 

Kier Construction - Southern Rosewood School, Hampshire 36.0 

Kier Construction - Western & Wales Porthcressa regeneration, Cornwall 35.0 

Exeter University Sports Park, Devon 37.5 

Brynhyfryd Care Home, Powys 35.0 

Grymscott Estate, Cornwall 34.0 

Whitechurch EM Primary, Cardiff 36.0 

Kier Construction - Central GAD Darlaston, West Midlands 34.5 

Phonenix SLC, Telford & Wrekin 36.0 

Kier Construction - Central South 

Mawsley Community Primary Extension, 

Northamptonshire 36.0 

Totals visits 

25.0 


35.60 


Kier North Tyneside Whiteley Bay High School, Tyne & Wear 34.0 

Kier Sheffield St George’s Court, South Yorkshire 34.5 

Totals visits 

2.0 


33.25 

PROPERTY 

Kier Homes 164-166 High Street, Cambridgeshire 34.0 

Kier Partnership Homes Lower High Street, phase 2, Cambridgeshire 36.5 

Ingestre Square, Staffordshire 36.5 

Totals visits 

3.0 


35.67 





17


Site reports • November 2012 


CONSTRUCTION 

Kier Construction - Eastern The County School, Cambridgeshire 34.0 

Hampton Community School, Lincolshire 36.0 

Tudor School, Suffolk 36.0 

Manson House, Suffolk 36.0 

Cambourne Secondary School 

Cambridgeshire 36.0 

Springfield new library, Essex 33.5 

Kier Construction - London Queensland Road, London 36.0 

Kier Construction - Northern The Walton Centre, Merseyside 36.0 

Rochdale Interchange, Manchester 35.0 

Kier Construction - Scotland Hermiston Retail Park, Co. Durham 35.5 

Whitburn Leisure Centre, West Lothian 35.5 

St Cadoc’s Primary School, South Lothina 35.0 

Maxwelton and Greenburn Primary School 

South Lanarkshire 35.5 

Kier Construction - Southern Eastbourne Academy, East Sussex 36.0 

Kier Construction - Western & Wales Estover Community Campus, Devon 37.5 

Sainsbury’s supermarket, Pontypridd 36.5 

Aberystwyth Law Courts, Ceredigion 36.5 

665/670 Ajaz, Berkshire 35.0 

Kier Construction - East Midlands Falcon Rod School, Devon 37.5 

Consol, phase 2, Cornwall 34.5 

Site A, PRC, Devon 33.0 

RUV, phase 3, Cornwall 34.5 

Site B, Smallcombe Road, Devon 34.0 

Culverland Road, Devon 35.5 

Bridge Meadow, Lapford 34.5 

Kier Construction - Central South Babraham Research Campus, Cambridgeshire 34.5 

Kier Construction - Central 

Mansfield passenger transport interchange 

Nottinghamshire 36.0 

Cookley Sebright School, Worcestershire 34.5 

Gloucestershire Academy, Gloucestershore 35.0 

Total visits 

25.0 


35.18 


Kier North Tyneside Whitley Lodge First School, Tyne & Wear 33.5 

Howdon bungalows, Northumberland 30.0 

Rocket Way refurbishment, Tyne & Wear 34.5 

Kier Sheffield Kier Sheffield Decent Homes, South Yorkshire 32.0 

Total visits 

4.0 


32.50 

PROPERTY 

Kier Homes Belvidere Village, Glasgow 34.5 

Hawkhead Village, Renfrewshire 35.0 

Academia, Turnford 36.0 

Kier Partnership Homes Willow Park, Nottinghamshire 34.0 

Total visits 

4.0 


34.88 





18


Site reports • December 2012 


CONSTRUCTION 

Kier Construction - Eastern UEA Earlham Hall refurbishment, Norfolk 35.5 

Cromwell Community College, Cambridgeshire 36.0 

Harris School SOR, Suffolk 34.0 

University of East Anglia, Norfolk 35.5 

Kier Construction - London Menorah School, London 35.5 

Etz Chaim Free School, Hertfordshire 36.0 

North Middlesex University Hospital BEH 

Clinical Strategy, London 35.0 

Kier Construction - Northern Blacon Crematorium, Cheshire 34.5 

Kier Construction - Scotland Halfway Park Primary School, South Lanarkshire 34.0 

Rhyber Avenue, Lanarkshire 35.5 

Kier Construction - Southern HMP Coldingley, Surrey 35.5 

Charters Retirement Village, West Sussex 36.0 

Neats Court, Kent 37.0 

HMYOI Rochester, Kent 36.0 

Pathology, St Richard’s Hospital, West Sussex 35.0 

Kier Construction - Western Porthcressa regeneration, Cornwall 36.0 

SWEC, South Decon College, Devon 37.0 

Grimscott Estate, Cornwall 35.0 

Kier Construction - Central South Nene Park Academy, Cambridgeshire 36.5 

St John’s Hall student residencies, 

Northampstonshire 35.0 

Lonza car park, Berkshire 34.0 

Kier Construction - Central Sheffield Community Academy, West Midlands 34.5 

Brook Haven, Worcestershire 35.0 

Cheltenham Bourneside School, Gloucestershire 34.5 

Total visits 

24.0 


35.35 


Kier Building Maintenance Peterlee Decent Homes, Co. Durham 36.0 

Kier North Tyneside Foxhunter Pavilion, Tyne & Wear 34.0 

North Sheilds Library, Tyne & Wear 31.0 

Kier Sheffield St George’s Court, South Yorkshire 35.0 

Kier Sheffield Decent Homes, Kinsley IL, 


Kier Decent Homes, East, South Yorkshire 36.0 

Kier Sheffield Decent Homes, South East 


Total visits 

7.0 


35.0 

PROPERTY 

Kier Homes Soverign Court, Cambridgeshire 32.0 

Kier Partnership Homes Hurcott Road, Worcestershire 34.5 

Grange Farm, West Midlands 35.0 

Owen Croft, West Midlands 35.0 

Total visits 

4.0 


34.75 





19

Two of the best recent site reports 

 

January2012 

 

 

58939 Two 

Arthouse(BuildingJ) 

 

 

KierConstruction 

MrPhilipDownham 

 

 

 

4.5 

 

5 

 

4.5 

 

 

5ŀ 

 

4.5 

 

4.5 

 

5 

Construction of an 8/S RCframed block building,consisting of 143 residential apartments as partof a very 

largemixedusedevelopmenton67acresofoldrailwaylandnearKingsCrossstation. 

The RC frame building is progressing with structural works to the basement and ground floors completed. There is a detailed Traffic 

Managementplanforthewholedevelopmentaswellasasiteonewithaone waysystemthroughthesite with full time gatemen and 

banksmensupervisingvehiclemovementsandunloading.Noparkingisavailableonsiteandallstaffusepublictransportorcycle.Thesite 

officehasbeenrelocatedtoalargesharedofficewithaneighbouringkiersiteandfacilitiesareprovidedtoaccommodatepersonswith 

restrictedmobility.SomesiteinformationisprintedinPolishanddisplayedonsiteandatinduction.Smokingisonlyallowedindesignated 

discreteareasonsiteandwithinthecompounds. 

ThedisplayedcompanyEnvironmentalPolicyandsitespecificplan,ismonitoredbythesitemanagers,coveredatinductionandtoolbox 

talksandauditedbytheresidentEnv.Officer,withdisplayboardsaroundthesite.Thereisfullmonitoringofthesite’scarbonfootprintwith 

targetssetforenergyandwateruseandwasterecycling.Ecocabinsinusewithhighinsulation,PIRlighting,automaticshutdownonall 

officeequipment,pushtapsandwaterharvestingfromcompoundbuildings.Alltravel,deliveryandwastemileageisrecorded.TheSWMP 

hasbeenupdatewithsegregationonsiteandenhancedcompanytargetsexceededfor%wasterecycled.Foodwastefromcanteenis 

stored in a biobin and collected and used locally in an anaerobic digester to produce electricity. A large concrete slope within the 

compoundistobeconvertedtoa‘greenwall’toencouragewildlifeintothearea. 

Thesitecontinuestogiveagoodfirstimpressionwithbrandedhoardingsuppliedbythemaincontractor,madefromrecycledplasticand 

cleanedweekly.Theperimeterisregularlycheckedforappearanceandlitterpickingcarriedoutasrequired.Therearepermanentroad 

sweepersaroundthedevelopmentandallaccessandsiteroadsarekeptcleanandmudfreeatalltimes.Therearevisionpanelsinthe 

hoardingandworkareaofthesiteiskeptisacleanandtidycondition.Dampingdowniscarriedouttocontroldust.Materialsandwaste 

skipstorageareasarewellorganisedandtidywithsecuremetalstoragecontainersavailable.Allofficeandwelfarefacilitiesarecleaned 

throughoutthedayandadeepcleancarriedouteverymonth. 

Neighboursarekeptfullyinformedofworksonthewholedevelopmentbytheclientwhoproducesamonthlynewsletterwhichallthesites 

contributeto.Thisisalsoavailablebyemailandonthededicatedwebsite.Therearenoticesdisplayedbytheviewingpanelsdescribing 

whatcanbeseenandthesitemanagerholdsmonthly‘constructionsurgerymeetings’whichallowsneighbourstovisitthesite&speakto 

thesiteteam.Thereisalotofprojectinvolvementwithavarietyofneighbouringgroups,organisationsandschools.Theseincludebuilding 

bencheswithdiscardedmaterials,constructingplantingboxestogrowvegetableswith‘globalgeneration’andbuildingaviewingplatform 

with discarded materials on the canal with a local wildlife trust. The site is also participating in a ‘Big Site Open Day’ for the whole 

development,withchildren’scompetitionsetc&visitfromthecompanymascot. 

Thereisawelfarecompoundadjacenttothesitewithafullyequippedmessroom,adryingroomwithgoodchangingfacilitiesandlockers, 

andatoiletblockwithseparatefemaletoilet,disabledtoiletandshower.Thesiteofficesaresharedwithaneighbouringsitewhichalso 

hasfullwelfarefacilitieswhichincludeafullservicedcanteenandacyclerack.Thecompanyhasafull‘coverup’policywithmandatory 

PPE being worn, includinggloves and goggles, with site specific hivis. The dangers ofexcessive exposure to thesunarecovered at 

inductionwithsunblockprovided.AsupplyofcleanPPE,includingboots,isavailableforvisitors.Acceptablesitelanguageandbehaviour 

iscoveredatinductionandnooffensivematerialorradiosareallowedonsite. 

ThesiteoperatesofaveryhighsafetylevelwithformalH&Svisitseverytwoweeksanddetailedweeklyinhousechecks.Forevery‘high 

score’achievedthecompanydonates£50tocharity,matchedbytheleaddeveloper,with£500alreadyraised.TherearedetailedH&S 

boardsonsiteforeachS/Candtheyarerequiredtoprovide1supervisorforevery7operatives.Nearmissesreportedviaacardsystem 

anda‘yousaid,wedid’boarddisplayed.Sitesafetypromotedby‘SUSA’whichisabehaviouralbasedapproach,whichS/C’sarebeing 

trainedin.Afurthertrafficcycleawarenessschemeforthelocalstudentshasbeenrun.Thesiterunsanemployeeandapprenticeofthe 

monthschemeandaleaguetableofperformanceoftheS/C’sisbeingsetup.Thereisadetailedfireplanwithfirepoints,escaperoutes 

andwirelesslinkedalarmsandregularfiredrillscarriedout. 

DetailsofthenearestA&Ehospitalaredisplayedwithmapsprovidedandtherearenumerousfullytrainedfirstaidersonsite,highlighted 

atinductionandbygreencrossonhardhats.Alloperativesreceiveasitespecificinductionwithallrelevantskillsandmedicalconditions 

recorded,aswellasCSCScardsandcontactsdetails.AlloperativesreceivephotoIDcardswhichgiverecordedaccesstothesiteand 

welfareareas.Therehavebeenseveralsitevisitsforlocalschoolsanda3hoursitevisitfortheConstructionYouthTrust,includingfull 

induction,whichwasverypositive.Sitehasprovidedworkplacements&workexperienceandtherearecurrently5apprenticesonsiteand 

aprograminplacetoprovidemanymore.Therehasbeentwooccupationalhealthvisitstositewithhearingandsighttestingcarriedout 

andfurtheroneplannedforcholesterolandbloodtesting. 

 

 

 

 

5 

ThewholesitemanagementteamarefullyinvolvedinpromotedtheidealsoftheCCSregistration.CCSbanners,flags&postersareall 

welldisplayed,bothexternallyandwithinthecabins.DetailsoftheschemeareaformalpartoftheinductionwithaCCSDVDavailableto 

show. The company is an Associate Member of the scheme and there is a detailed site file recording all CCS related activities. The 

construction manager is also promoting the scheme to all S/C’s and setting up monthly meetings on site to promote CCS standards. 

Benefitsofsiteregistrationarepromotedtoneighboursviathedistributednewsletter&mostofthesitesonthedevelopmentareregistered 

withthescheme.Theclientisalsofullyoftheschemeandwillreceiveacopyofthisreport. 

(outof40): 

 

The promising start shown on the first visit has been well developed with many initiatives taking place and the CCS ideals being promoted at every 

opportunity.Thereisalotofpositiveinvolvementwithlocalschoolsandorganisationsandtheconstructionindustryisbeingwellpromoted.Mythanks, 

onceagaintoPhilip,Gary,Rachaeland,inparticular,Mikefortheirtimeandhospitality 

No 14 th September2012 

Bsc(Hons)MRICSMBEng 

 

 

Majornoncompliance Highlevelbeyondcompliance 

Minornoncompliance Exceptionalmeasurestaken 

Compliance 

 



20

Two of the best recent site reports continued 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



21



22

CCS co-ordinators 

Note: This list of CCS co-ordinators/representatives has been submitted by the companies named below. Those companies not 

listed below are asked to email lauren.jones@kier.co.uk with their representatives’ names(s) as soon as possible. 

Kier Construction - Building 

• David Allen, SHE manager 

• Val Atha, regional office manager 

• Ian Brooks, business improvement manager 

• Theresa Burkat, business development 

• Richard Charman, director 

• David Coleman, marketing manager 

• Janet Crabtree, business development manager 

• Manni Ferguson, procurement manager 

• Jamie Hunt, business improvement manager 

• Cheryl Arnold, systems assistant 

• Tom Tagg, director 

Kier Property 

• Adam Vine, associate director 

Kier Property - Homes 

• Mark Smith, construction director 

Kier Services - Maintenance 

• John Bower, services manager 

• Keith Naylor, operations manager 

• Kevin Young, operations manager 


Tempsford Hall 

Sandy 

Bedfordshire SG19 2BD 

Tel: 01767640111 

Fax: 01767640002 

www.kier.co.uk 



23

Download - Kier Group

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?