Alternative Globalization Addressing Peoples and Earth

53
globalization, and the commitment to transform the system:
“We reject the current world economic order imposed by global neoliberal
capitalism and any other economic system, including absolute
planned economies, which defy God’s covenant by excluding the poor,
the vulnerable and the whole of creation from the fullness of life. We
reject any claim of economic, political, and military empire which
subverts God’s sovereignty over life and acts contrary to God’s just
rule.”
After the critique of economic globalization, the delegates underlined
the need to covenant in justice with God:
“On this common journey, some churches have already expressed
their commitment in a confession of faith. We urge them to continue
to translate this confession into concrete actions both regionally and
locally. Other churches have already begun to engage in this process,
including taking actions, and we urge them to engage further, through
education, confession and action. To those other churches, which
are still in the process of recognition, we urge them on the basis of
our mutual covenanting accountability, to deepen their education
and move forward towards confession.”
The Accra declaration will remain a very critical challenge to churches
for years to come.
WCC / World Bank and IMF encounters 2002-2003
Following a request from the Bretton Woods institutions, three external
encounters with these institutions, and one internal encounter with
churches and specialized ministries were organized in 2002 and 2003. The
request had come in response to a WCC background document entitled
“Lead us not into temptation: churches’ response to the policies of
international finance institutions. During the encounters, the WCC
emphasized that poverty eradication can be achieved only by addressing
injustice and inequality, the roots of which lie in the present unjust
economic order.
A final paper on “Common ground and differences” and a joint statement
issued at a high-level encounter in November 2003 with the president of
the World Bank and the deputy managing director of IMF indicate that
the WB/IMF will not shift from the concept of growth as the panacea to
alleviate poverty. They claim that they are not mandated to promote human