07.04.2014 Views

Acute Flaccid Paralysis Accompanying West Nile Meningitis Ahmed ...

Acute Flaccid Paralysis Accompanying West Nile Meningitis Ahmed ...

Acute Flaccid Paralysis Accompanying West Nile Meningitis Ahmed ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Does Academic Detailing Increase Use and Documentation of Clinical Decision Rules for<br />

Pulmonary Embolism?<br />

Grant, M, D.O., Patel, N, D.O., Horan, T, MSIV, MPH<br />

St. Joseph's Regional Medical Center, Emergency Medicine Residency, Paterson, NJ<br />

Introduction: The Well's Criteria for Pulmonary Embolus and the Pulmonary Embolism Rule Out<br />

Criteria (PERC) are two clinical decision rules that have been prospectively validated to guide the<br />

diagnostic work up of pulmonary embolism. Emergency Department physicians commonly do not<br />

document the use of a clinical decision rule for the work-up of pulmonary embolism, whether they use<br />

a rule or not, possibly leading to inappropriate ordering of diagnostic testing and exposing patients to<br />

certain unnecessary risks such as contrast dye and radiation. We hypothesize that academic detailing<br />

does increase documentation and use of clinical decision rules for pulmonary embolism in the<br />

evaluation of patients in the emergency department.<br />

Methods: A retrospective and prospective chart review was conducted over two three-month periods.<br />

The study was performed at a single urban regional emergency medical center with over 140,000<br />

visits/year and an emergency medicine residency training program. Charts included were all charts<br />

with an order of D-dimer in the chart, any order of CT angiogram chest and charts with a final<br />

diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Exclusion criteria included patients who did not have the CT<br />

angiogram chest done in the ED or had an order of D-dimer in the chart for evaluation of other<br />

diagnoses rather than pulmonary embolism. In addition, the Well's score and PERC rule were<br />

calculated for all charts, regardless if the clinical decision rules were documented in the charts.<br />

Academic detailing was implemented through several mechanisms. A grand rounds lecture on clinical<br />

decision rules for pulmonary embolism focusing on the Well's Criteria and the PERC rule was given to<br />

attending physicians and residents. A diagnostic algorithm was also developed to help guide physician<br />

diagnostic workup of pulmonary embolism. The PERC rule was also added to the electronic medical<br />

record as the Well's Criteria was already available for use in the documentation system. The rates of<br />

use and documentation of the Well's Criteria and the PERC rule were then analyzed pre and post<br />

academic detailing.<br />

Results: The total number of charts reviewed were 258 retrospectively and 316 prospectively.<br />

Overall, ten charts had documentation retrospectively and 40 charts had documentation prospectively.<br />

This was an increase from 4.03% documentation retrospectively to 14.49% prospectively. The odds<br />

ratio was 3.59 (95% CI: 1.76 - 7.34, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!