Trends in global CO2 emissions - edgar - Europa
Trends in global CO2 emissions - edgar - Europa
Trends in global CO2 emissions - edgar - Europa
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
TWO<br />
Figure 2.1<br />
Global CO 2<br />
<strong>emissions</strong> per region from fossil fuel use and cement production<br />
40<br />
1000 million tonnes CO 2<br />
International transport<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014<br />
Develop<strong>in</strong>g countries<br />
Other develop<strong>in</strong>g countries<br />
Other large develop<strong>in</strong>g countries<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Industrialised countries (Annex I)<br />
Other Economies In Transition (EIT)<br />
Russian Federation<br />
Other OECD1990 countries<br />
Japan<br />
EU12 (new Member States)<br />
EU15<br />
United States<br />
Source: EDGAR 4.2 (1970–2008); IEA, 2011; USGS, 2012; WSA, 2012; NOAA, 2012<br />
The uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> these figures varies between countries,<br />
from 5% to 10% (95% confidence <strong>in</strong>terval), with the<br />
largest uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties for data on countries with fast<br />
chang<strong>in</strong>g or emerg<strong>in</strong>g economies, such as the Russian<br />
Federation <strong>in</strong> the early 1990s and for Ch<strong>in</strong>a s<strong>in</strong>ce the late<br />
1990s, and for the most recent statistics, based on<br />
Marland et al. (1999), Tu (2011), Andres et al. (2012) and<br />
Guan et al. (2012). Moreover, newly published statistics<br />
are often subject to revisions later. Therefore, for Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />
and the Russian Federation, we assume 10% uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty,<br />
whereas for the European Union, the United States, India<br />
and Japan, a 5% uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty is assumed. Our prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
estimate for total <strong>global</strong> CO 2<br />
<strong>emissions</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2011 is believed<br />
to have an uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty of about 5% and the <strong>in</strong>crease of<br />
2.9% may be accurate to with<strong>in</strong> 0.5% (see Section A1.3 <strong>in</strong><br />
Annex 1 for more details).<br />
2.2 Large regional differences:<br />
<strong>emissions</strong> soar <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a and India<br />
and decrease <strong>in</strong> OECD countries<br />
OECD and EIT countries<br />
The strong economic recovery <strong>in</strong> 2010 <strong>in</strong> most OECD-<br />
1990 1 countries did not cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong> 2011. In Europe, CO 2<br />
<strong>emissions</strong> from <strong>in</strong>dustries regulated by the EU Emissions<br />
1<br />
Here, the OECD composition of 1990 is used (i.e. without<br />
Mexico, South Korea, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary<br />
and Poland).<br />
Trad<strong>in</strong>g System (EU ETS) decreased <strong>in</strong> 2011 by 2%, after an<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease of 3% <strong>in</strong> 2010 and an exceptional decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> CO 2<br />
<strong>emissions</strong> of 12% <strong>in</strong> 2009 (EC, 2012). In the United States,<br />
<strong>in</strong>dustrial <strong>emissions</strong> from fuel combustion <strong>in</strong>creased by<br />
0.4% <strong>in</strong> 2011, after a 5% jump <strong>in</strong> 2010 and steep decl<strong>in</strong>es of<br />
3% and 7% <strong>in</strong> 2008 and 2009, which were ma<strong>in</strong>ly caused<br />
by the recession <strong>in</strong> 2008–2009, high oil prices compared<br />
to low fuel taxes, and an <strong>in</strong>creased share of natural gas<br />
(EIA, 2012a,b). Total <strong>emissions</strong> <strong>in</strong> the European Union<br />
(EU27) decreased <strong>in</strong> 2011 by 3% to 3.8 billion tonnes, and <strong>in</strong><br />
the United States by 2% to 5.4 billion tonnes. In 2011, CO 2<br />
<strong>emissions</strong> also decreased <strong>in</strong> Japan by 2% to 1.2 billion<br />
tonnes, whereas CO 2<br />
<strong>emissions</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>, for example,<br />
Australia (by 8%) and Canada (by 2%) as well as <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong><br />
(by 1%). In Russia, <strong>emissions</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased by 3% to 1.8 billion<br />
tonnes. In other countries with Economies In Transition<br />
(EIT), <strong>emissions</strong> also <strong>in</strong>creased, such as <strong>in</strong> the Ukra<strong>in</strong>e by<br />
7%. Total CO 2<br />
<strong>emissions</strong> for all <strong>in</strong>dustrialised countries<br />
that have quantitative greenhouse gas mitigation targets<br />
under the Kyoto Protocol decreased <strong>in</strong> 2011 by 0.7%<br />
(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the United States, which did not ratify the<br />
Kyoto Protocol) (see Table A1.2).<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a and India<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce 2002, annual economic growth <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a accelerated<br />
from 4% to 11%, on average. CO 2<br />
<strong>emissions</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased by<br />
150% <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, and <strong>in</strong> India by 75%. S<strong>in</strong>ce the end of 2008,<br />
Ch<strong>in</strong>a has implemented a large economic stimulus<br />
package that helped also to effectively avoid a decrease<br />
<strong>in</strong> annual economic growth, as suffered by many<br />
countries dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>global</strong> recession of 2008–2009. This<br />
package was aimed at mitigat<strong>in</strong>g the decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> economic<br />
Results |<br />
11