07.04.2014 Views

Trends in global CO2 emissions - edgar - Europa

Trends in global CO2 emissions - edgar - Europa

Trends in global CO2 emissions - edgar - Europa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TWO<br />

Figure 2.1<br />

Global CO 2<br />

<strong>emissions</strong> per region from fossil fuel use and cement production<br />

40<br />

1000 million tonnes CO 2<br />

International transport<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014<br />

Develop<strong>in</strong>g countries<br />

Other develop<strong>in</strong>g countries<br />

Other large develop<strong>in</strong>g countries<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Industrialised countries (Annex I)<br />

Other Economies In Transition (EIT)<br />

Russian Federation<br />

Other OECD1990 countries<br />

Japan<br />

EU12 (new Member States)<br />

EU15<br />

United States<br />

Source: EDGAR 4.2 (1970–2008); IEA, 2011; USGS, 2012; WSA, 2012; NOAA, 2012<br />

The uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>in</strong> these figures varies between countries,<br />

from 5% to 10% (95% confidence <strong>in</strong>terval), with the<br />

largest uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties for data on countries with fast<br />

chang<strong>in</strong>g or emerg<strong>in</strong>g economies, such as the Russian<br />

Federation <strong>in</strong> the early 1990s and for Ch<strong>in</strong>a s<strong>in</strong>ce the late<br />

1990s, and for the most recent statistics, based on<br />

Marland et al. (1999), Tu (2011), Andres et al. (2012) and<br />

Guan et al. (2012). Moreover, newly published statistics<br />

are often subject to revisions later. Therefore, for Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

and the Russian Federation, we assume 10% uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty,<br />

whereas for the European Union, the United States, India<br />

and Japan, a 5% uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty is assumed. Our prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

estimate for total <strong>global</strong> CO 2<br />

<strong>emissions</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2011 is believed<br />

to have an uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty of about 5% and the <strong>in</strong>crease of<br />

2.9% may be accurate to with<strong>in</strong> 0.5% (see Section A1.3 <strong>in</strong><br />

Annex 1 for more details).<br />

2.2 Large regional differences:<br />

<strong>emissions</strong> soar <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a and India<br />

and decrease <strong>in</strong> OECD countries<br />

OECD and EIT countries<br />

The strong economic recovery <strong>in</strong> 2010 <strong>in</strong> most OECD-<br />

1990 1 countries did not cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong> 2011. In Europe, CO 2<br />

<strong>emissions</strong> from <strong>in</strong>dustries regulated by the EU Emissions<br />

1<br />

Here, the OECD composition of 1990 is used (i.e. without<br />

Mexico, South Korea, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary<br />

and Poland).<br />

Trad<strong>in</strong>g System (EU ETS) decreased <strong>in</strong> 2011 by 2%, after an<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease of 3% <strong>in</strong> 2010 and an exceptional decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> CO 2<br />

<strong>emissions</strong> of 12% <strong>in</strong> 2009 (EC, 2012). In the United States,<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrial <strong>emissions</strong> from fuel combustion <strong>in</strong>creased by<br />

0.4% <strong>in</strong> 2011, after a 5% jump <strong>in</strong> 2010 and steep decl<strong>in</strong>es of<br />

3% and 7% <strong>in</strong> 2008 and 2009, which were ma<strong>in</strong>ly caused<br />

by the recession <strong>in</strong> 2008–2009, high oil prices compared<br />

to low fuel taxes, and an <strong>in</strong>creased share of natural gas<br />

(EIA, 2012a,b). Total <strong>emissions</strong> <strong>in</strong> the European Union<br />

(EU27) decreased <strong>in</strong> 2011 by 3% to 3.8 billion tonnes, and <strong>in</strong><br />

the United States by 2% to 5.4 billion tonnes. In 2011, CO 2<br />

<strong>emissions</strong> also decreased <strong>in</strong> Japan by 2% to 1.2 billion<br />

tonnes, whereas CO 2<br />

<strong>emissions</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong>, for example,<br />

Australia (by 8%) and Canada (by 2%) as well as <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

(by 1%). In Russia, <strong>emissions</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased by 3% to 1.8 billion<br />

tonnes. In other countries with Economies In Transition<br />

(EIT), <strong>emissions</strong> also <strong>in</strong>creased, such as <strong>in</strong> the Ukra<strong>in</strong>e by<br />

7%. Total CO 2<br />

<strong>emissions</strong> for all <strong>in</strong>dustrialised countries<br />

that have quantitative greenhouse gas mitigation targets<br />

under the Kyoto Protocol decreased <strong>in</strong> 2011 by 0.7%<br />

(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the United States, which did not ratify the<br />

Kyoto Protocol) (see Table A1.2).<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a and India<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce 2002, annual economic growth <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a accelerated<br />

from 4% to 11%, on average. CO 2<br />

<strong>emissions</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased by<br />

150% <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a, and <strong>in</strong> India by 75%. S<strong>in</strong>ce the end of 2008,<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a has implemented a large economic stimulus<br />

package that helped also to effectively avoid a decrease<br />

<strong>in</strong> annual economic growth, as suffered by many<br />

countries dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>global</strong> recession of 2008–2009. This<br />

package was aimed at mitigat<strong>in</strong>g the decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> economic<br />

Results |<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!