Published or not - fyto

Published or not - fyto Published or not - fyto

phytoweb.fgov.be
from phytoweb.fgov.be More from this publisher
06.04.2014 Views

CHLOROTHALONIL - 17 - APPENDIX II END POINTS AND RELATED INFORMATION 2. Fate and behaviour in the environment 20 December 2004 Field studies: Lysimeter/Field leaching studies A 3 year field groundwater monitoring study in North Carolina (USA): application is 2.5 kg/ha, 8 times with 14 day interval, annual average precipitation is approx. 1700 mm. In this study chlorothalonil remained in the upper soil layer (0-15 cm) and SDS-3701 was found to a depth of 31 cm. Chlorothalonil, SDS-3701, SDS-47525, and SDS-19221 were not found in the groundwater. However, SDS-46851 was found in groundwater at depths of 5.8- 10.4 m in max. concentrations from 1.8 to 10.1 µg/l. A 2 year lysimeter study in Munster (Germany): application is 0,99 kg/ha, annual average precipitation is 910 mm, annual average leachate is approx. 360 mm. In this study the highest concentration measured in the leachated could be attributed to R417888 in a maximum of 24% of radioactivity present in the leachate during the first year. Mean annual measured concentrations are 9.3 µg/l and 7.4 µg/l a.i. equivalent for the two lysimeters respectively. Based on the relative molar mass of 1.23, the averaged annual concentration amounts to 10.3 µg/l. R419492 was detected in the

CHLOROTHALONIL - 18 - APPENDIX II END POINTS AND RELATED INFORMATION 2. Fate and behaviour in the environment 20 December 2004 leachate as well in a concentration of 11% of the applied r.a.. Based on the relative molar mass of 1.4, the averaged annual concentration amounts to 4.4 µg/l. At least five other (polar) metabolites are found in amounts >0.1 µg/l as chlorothalonil equivalents. Total amounts of radioactivity equivalents (annual average) amounted to: 31.8 and 25.6 µg/l for both lysimeters respectively in the first year and 4.94 and 4.86 µg/l in the second year. Maximum individual concentrations of a.i. equivalents were 79 and 59 µg/l for the two lysimeters respectively in the first year. No parent compound and none of the main metabolites available as reference substance (SDS-3701; SDS- 19221; SDS-47523; SDS-47524; SDS-47525; SDS-66882 and SDS-67042) were detected by radio HPLC, except for SDS- 46851, detected in a selected sample (19-11-96) at 0.2 µg/l. Remarks: none

CHLOROTHALONIL<br />

- 17 -<br />

APPENDIX II<br />

END POINTS AND RELATED INFORMATION<br />

2. Fate and behaviour in the environment<br />

20 December 2004<br />

Field studies:<br />

Lysimeter/Field leaching studies A 3 year field groundwater<br />

monit<strong>or</strong>ing study in N<strong>or</strong>th Carolina<br />

(USA): application is 2.5 kg/ha, 8<br />

times with 14 day interval, annual<br />

average precipitation is approx.<br />

1700 mm. In this study<br />

chl<strong>or</strong>othalonil remained in the<br />

upper soil layer (0-15 cm) and<br />

SDS-3701 was found to a depth of<br />

31 cm. Chl<strong>or</strong>othalonil, SDS-3701,<br />

SDS-47525, and SDS-19221 were<br />

<strong>not</strong> found in the groundwater.<br />

However, SDS-46851 was found<br />

in groundwater at depths of 5.8-<br />

10.4 m in max. concentrations<br />

from 1.8 to 10.1 µg/l.<br />

A 2 year lysimeter study in<br />

Munster (Germany): application is<br />

0,99 kg/ha, annual average<br />

precipitation is 910 mm, annual<br />

average leachate is approx. 360<br />

mm. In this study the highest<br />

concentration measured in the<br />

leachated could be attributed to<br />

R417888 in a maximum of 24% of<br />

radioactivity present in the<br />

leachate during the first year.<br />

Mean annual measured<br />

concentrations are 9.3 µg/l and 7.4<br />

µg/l a.i. equivalent f<strong>or</strong> the two<br />

lysimeters respectively. Based on<br />

the relative molar mass of 1.23,<br />

the averaged annual concentration<br />

amounts to 10.3 µg/l.<br />

R419492 was detected in the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!