05.04.2014 Views

Jacking Pipe in Phoenix Soils - Government Engineering Journal

Jacking Pipe in Phoenix Soils - Government Engineering Journal

Jacking Pipe in Phoenix Soils - Government Engineering Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Jack<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Pipe</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Phoenix</strong> <strong>Soils</strong><br />

Project is a first <strong>in</strong> the most significant upsize and maximum<br />

drive length <strong>in</strong> the United States us<strong>in</strong>g the static pull<br />

burst<strong>in</strong>g method with replacement segmental pipe.<br />

By Robert Webb and<br />

Roger Olsen<br />

P<br />

hoenix has been experienc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

tremendous population growth<br />

<strong>in</strong> recent years, as part of the<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g Southwest region of the<br />

United States. This growth has taxed<br />

some areas of its collection system.<br />

Through recent sewer model<strong>in</strong>g updates<br />

and the new Arizona Department of<br />

Environmental Quality design requirements,<br />

portions of the city’s wastewater<br />

collection system were found to be at,<br />

above, or near<strong>in</strong>g capacity. The addition<br />

of the new <strong>in</strong>filtration and <strong>in</strong>flow design<br />

requirements, coupled with the recent<br />

population growth and the recent calibration<br />

of its sewer model, <strong>in</strong>dicated the<br />

city’s collection system would require<br />

immediate upgrades <strong>in</strong> many locations.<br />

<strong>Phoenix</strong> developed the Sanitary<br />

Sewer Relief and Replacement Program<br />

to confront these issues. The potential<br />

capacity deficiencies could impact new<br />

Peoria Avenue <strong>Pipe</strong> Burst—15-<strong>in</strong>. to 18-<strong>in</strong>. vitrified clay pipe.<br />

development upstream, which is an<br />

important stimulus to the <strong>Phoenix</strong><br />

economy. Upsiz<strong>in</strong>g with full pipe<br />

replacement, relief sewers, diversions,<br />

and other techniques were considered as<br />

solutions to this potential capacity deficiency.<br />

The use of trenchless technologies<br />

was approved by <strong>Phoenix</strong> as an<br />

acceptable alternative approach to m<strong>in</strong>imize<br />

the impacts created by these construction<br />

projects.<br />

<strong>Phoenix</strong> decided to use a<br />

Construction Manager at Risk<br />

(CM@R) delivery method to tackle this<br />

enormous undertak<strong>in</strong>g. Project<br />

Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Consultants (PEC,<br />

www.pecaz.com) was one of eight eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

firms selected for this program.<br />

In particular, PEC was assigned a relief<br />

sewer project <strong>in</strong> the area of 35th Avenue<br />

and Peoria Avenue <strong>in</strong> <strong>Phoenix</strong>. PEC<br />

worked closely with Kiewit Western<br />

Company (CM@R contractor) from the<br />

30 percent phase of the design to develop<br />

an <strong>in</strong>novative approach to <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

the capacity deficiencies with m<strong>in</strong>imal<br />

socio-economic impact. The goal was to<br />

consider alternatives that would m<strong>in</strong>imize<br />

conventional open-cut construction<br />

headaches such as imped<strong>in</strong>g traffic,<br />

impact<strong>in</strong>g local bus<strong>in</strong>ess and customers<br />

and to ultimately render a less costly<br />

solution. <strong>Pipe</strong> burst<strong>in</strong>g was determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

to fulfill the need for upsiz<strong>in</strong>g these<br />

capacity deficient pipes without open<br />

trench<strong>in</strong>g their streets. Kiewit submitted<br />

a f<strong>in</strong>al guaranteed maximum price of<br />

$5.3 million for pipe burst<strong>in</strong>g, which<br />

fell well below the open-cut cost model<br />

for the project—about $7.9 million.<br />

Project Details<br />

The project consisted of an unprecedented<br />

upsiz<strong>in</strong>g of nearly 7,400 ft of<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g 12- and 15-<strong>in</strong>. pipe, which are<br />

ten to 20 ft deep under major streets<br />

with the usual multitude of exist<strong>in</strong>g utilities.<br />

The sewer layout consisted of two<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>es perpendicular to each other<br />

that <strong>in</strong>tersected at Peoria Avenue and<br />

35th Avenue. The 2,500 ft along Peoria<br />

sewer ma<strong>in</strong> was an exist<strong>in</strong>g 15-<strong>in</strong>. vitrified<br />

clay pipe (VCP) to be upsized to<br />

18-<strong>in</strong>. diameter. The 4,700 ft along<br />

35th Avenue sewer ma<strong>in</strong> was for the<br />

most part an exist<strong>in</strong>g 12-<strong>in</strong>. VCP pipe<br />

to be double upsized for most of its<br />

length to an 18-<strong>in</strong>. diameter. The<br />

method of pipe burst selected was static<br />

pull with “cartridge” load<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g segmented<br />

jack<strong>in</strong>g pipe.<br />

This method of pipe burst<strong>in</strong>g kept<br />

the jobsite footpr<strong>in</strong>t relatively small and<br />

compact. Utiliz<strong>in</strong>g segmented pipe<br />

elim<strong>in</strong>ates the need for a long lay-down<br />

26 ■ GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING ■ NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2009 www.govengr.com


Grundoburst 2500G (top) and extraction<br />

cage (bottom) <strong>in</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g pit.<br />

area on the project site as would be<br />

required with welded pipe. This is highly<br />

beneficial <strong>in</strong> high-traffic urban sett<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

as long str<strong>in</strong>gs of welded pipe<br />

would have <strong>in</strong>hibited traffic flow and<br />

driveway access before and dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

burst<strong>in</strong>g operation. Consequently, traffic<br />

control did not become a major issue<br />

for this project dur<strong>in</strong>g the pipe burst<strong>in</strong>g<br />

operation.<br />

Launch and receiv<strong>in</strong>g pits were constructed<br />

at new manhole locations at<br />

about 400-ft <strong>in</strong>tervals. Trench boxes<br />

were used to stabilize the walls of the<br />

pits and provide a safe work<strong>in</strong>g environment<br />

allow<strong>in</strong>g ample room for equipment<br />

and pipe. The burst<strong>in</strong>g equipment<br />

could easily be rotated 180-degrees <strong>in</strong><br />

the launch<strong>in</strong>g pit to beg<strong>in</strong> burst<strong>in</strong>g pipe<br />

from the opposite direction.<br />

<strong>Pipe</strong> burst<strong>in</strong>g requires the flow <strong>in</strong> the<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g pipe to be bypassed or diverted<br />

out of the pipe. The exist<strong>in</strong>g pipe was<br />

cleaned and closed-circuit television<br />

<strong>in</strong>spected to ensure there were no severe<br />

alignment problems, sags, and to locate<br />

all service laterals before <strong>in</strong>stallation of<br />

new pipe. Exist<strong>in</strong>g service laterals were<br />

<strong>in</strong>tercepted, monitored dur<strong>in</strong>g the operation,<br />

and connected <strong>in</strong>to the sewer<br />

bypass system, which ran above and<br />

alongside the pipe burst<strong>in</strong>g operation.<br />

The bypass pip<strong>in</strong>g was conveniently tied<br />

to the sewer system far downstream<br />

from all the operations. When a driveway<br />

was encountered, the bypass pip<strong>in</strong>g<br />

was trenched under and paved to allow<br />

property owners full access at all times.<br />

The project also <strong>in</strong>cluded a 200-ft<br />

jack-and-bore portion through the high<br />

traffic volume <strong>in</strong>tersection of 35th<br />

Avenue and Peoria Avenue. The CM@R<br />

used a local subcontractor to perform<br />

that operation. It entailed a setup that<br />

<strong>in</strong>stalled a 36-<strong>in</strong>. OD, 3/8-<strong>in</strong>. thick steel<br />

cas<strong>in</strong>g diagonally across the <strong>in</strong>tersection<br />

from the traffic island <strong>in</strong> Peoria Avenue<br />

northeast to the sidewalk <strong>in</strong> 35th<br />

Avenue. 180 l<strong>in</strong>ear ft of 18-<strong>in</strong>. bell-andspigot<br />

VCP was jacked <strong>in</strong>to the new cas<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The jack-and-bore took about 3.5<br />

weeks to complete. An additional two to<br />

three days was added to the jack-andbore<br />

schedule because part of the tunnel<br />

had to be hand m<strong>in</strong>ed.<br />

All the utilities <strong>in</strong> the pipe zone were<br />

identified <strong>in</strong> the plans and marked by<br />

the respective Arizona Call Center “Blue<br />

Stake.” Some of these <strong>in</strong>cluded fiber<br />

optics conduits and electric duct banks,<br />

which were potholed and surveyed,<br />

waterl<strong>in</strong>es, telephone conduits, natural<br />

gas l<strong>in</strong>es, storm dra<strong>in</strong> connectors, and<br />

sewer l<strong>in</strong>es. Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>itial construction<br />

<strong>in</strong> one portion of the alignment, problems<br />

were encountered with an exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

40-year old six-<strong>in</strong>. water ma<strong>in</strong> composed<br />

of asbestos cement pipe (ACP),<br />

which meandered adjacent to the sewer<br />

alignment. The ACP water ma<strong>in</strong> began<br />

break<strong>in</strong>g at multiple locations apparently<br />

due to pipe movement caused from<br />

soil displacement dur<strong>in</strong>g the pipe burst<strong>in</strong>g<br />

operation. The city decided to relocate<br />

the entire portion of the ACP<br />

waterl<strong>in</strong>e, which was with<strong>in</strong> six ft of the<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g sewer pipe.<br />

The decision to relocate<br />

this exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

water l<strong>in</strong>e would have<br />

been the same if an<br />

open-cut construction<br />

method was<br />

elected over pipe<br />

burst<strong>in</strong>g. There were<br />

no other major conflicts<br />

with utilities<br />

and no service disruptions<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g construction.<br />

The utilities<br />

that ended up <strong>in</strong><br />

the pit areas were<br />

supported and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

at all times.<br />

Pothol<strong>in</strong>g of electrical utilities was<br />

performed dur<strong>in</strong>g design. In addition to<br />

pothol<strong>in</strong>g, soil bor<strong>in</strong>gs were collected<br />

every 150 to 200 ft along the project for<br />

a total of 19 soil bor<strong>in</strong>gs. Soil bor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

data is important for pipe burst<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

jack-and-bore projects to determ<strong>in</strong>e feasibility.<br />

Soil classification, size, and density<br />

are particularly important.<br />

Burst<strong>in</strong>g Challenges<br />

Generally, the pipe burst<strong>in</strong>g went<br />

smoothly, which was commendable, due<br />

to conditions that had to be overcome.<br />

The Peoria Avenue section had the most<br />

challenges due to the orig<strong>in</strong>al pipe<br />

<strong>in</strong>stallation and exist<strong>in</strong>g trench configurations.<br />

There were three locations along<br />

Peoria Avenue that required excavation.<br />

The equipment operator could usually<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e when harder conditions were<br />

encountered by the sound of the burst<strong>in</strong>g<br />

unit’s power pack. Excessive<br />

hydraulic pressures usually <strong>in</strong>dicated the<br />

presence of an obstruction. It was more<br />

economical for the contractor to cont<strong>in</strong>ue<br />

the pipe burst and avoid open-cut<br />

due to higher production rates with pipe<br />

burst<strong>in</strong>g. One obstruction proved to be<br />

non-compressible backfill (cementitious<br />

cap) or an exist<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t repair. The<br />

cementitious cap appeared to be low<br />

strength because the burst<strong>in</strong>g operation<br />

pulled through much of it. When difficult<br />

ground conditions caused hydraulic<br />

pressures to exceed the work<strong>in</strong>g limits of<br />

the mach<strong>in</strong>e, it was mutually decided to<br />

open-cut those portions. The burst<strong>in</strong>g<br />

head was excavated and a portion was<br />

24-<strong>in</strong>. OD expander followed by the new 18-<strong>in</strong>. VCP jack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

pipe on arrival <strong>in</strong>to the receiv<strong>in</strong>g pit.<br />

www.govengr.com GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING ■ NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2009 ■ 27


hand laid for a short distance until the<br />

ground conditions improved allow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

burst<strong>in</strong>g operations to resume.<br />

In isolated cases, the orig<strong>in</strong>al pipe was<br />

laid closer to one side of the orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

trench wall and not the centerl<strong>in</strong>e of the<br />

trench. The orig<strong>in</strong>al trench wall was<br />

more unyield<strong>in</strong>g than the bedd<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

backfill materials and would not accept<br />

the necessary compaction required by<br />

the pipe burst<strong>in</strong>g process as readily as<br />

the bedd<strong>in</strong>g and backfill material. These<br />

obstacles <strong>in</strong>creased pull<strong>in</strong>g tensions<br />

above the equipment’s safe work<strong>in</strong>g limits.<br />

In these situations, the burst<strong>in</strong>g head<br />

was excavated and pipe was hand laid<br />

until conditions improved. If additional<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation about the trench geometry,<br />

pipe location, and other obstructions<br />

would have been available, shafts might<br />

have been relocated result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a different<br />

pipe burst<strong>in</strong>g strategy.<br />

40-ton cyl<strong>in</strong>der pack.<br />

The contractor’s second pull at 35th<br />

Avenue exceeded all expectations. After<br />

the first pull of about 98 ft, the mach<strong>in</strong>e<br />

was relocated downstream and the<br />

longest burst of 448 ft was accomplished<br />

with only m<strong>in</strong>or issues. There were<br />

some areas where m<strong>in</strong>or heav<strong>in</strong>g was<br />

observed because the exist<strong>in</strong>g bottom of<br />

the pipe was about ten ft deep. M<strong>in</strong>or<br />

cracks occurred <strong>in</strong> paved areas where the<br />

access streets were to be repaired anyway.<br />

A portion of sidewalk rose around<br />

a bus bay, which was easily repaired.<br />

Other than these few locations, no other<br />

locations of heave were observed.<br />

A portion of the upstream pipe rose a<br />

few <strong>in</strong>ches dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>itial pull back<br />

and the contractor adjusted those few<br />

pipe sections before re<strong>in</strong>stall<strong>in</strong>g a new<br />

manhole <strong>in</strong> the launch<strong>in</strong>g pit. This was<br />

the longest attempt us<strong>in</strong>g this method<br />

of pipe burst<strong>in</strong>g, which was an encourag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

turn for the project and helped<br />

calm some of the jitters. The pull back<br />

was completed <strong>in</strong> only a few hours.<br />

Initially, the project schedule was<br />

delayed due to record summer ra<strong>in</strong>falls<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the “monsoon” season <strong>in</strong> the valley.<br />

Ra<strong>in</strong> also delayed the project for two<br />

to three days dur<strong>in</strong>g the w<strong>in</strong>ter ra<strong>in</strong>y<br />

season <strong>in</strong> December. Ra<strong>in</strong> delays were<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to pit flood<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Burst<strong>in</strong>g Equipment Setup<br />

The static pipe burst<strong>in</strong>g equipment,<br />

provided by TT Technologies Inc.<br />

(www.tttechnologies.com), <strong>in</strong>cluded a<br />

Grundoburst® 2500G static burst<strong>in</strong>g<br />

mach<strong>in</strong>e and the accompany<strong>in</strong>g tool<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

This mach<strong>in</strong>e can pull up to 315 tons. It<br />

would prove necessary to use virtually<br />

all of the mach<strong>in</strong>e’s capacity <strong>in</strong> the difficult<br />

soil conditions encountered on the<br />

project. The Grundoburst 2500G<br />

mach<strong>in</strong>e utilizes Quicklock rods<br />

between the mach<strong>in</strong>e and the expander<br />

that weigh about 400 lb each. These<br />

rods were connected to a special 22-<strong>in</strong>.<br />

OD expander sized for the new 18-<strong>in</strong>.<br />

VCP. The expander had a special <strong>in</strong>ternal<br />

socket arrangement for the lead<br />

piece of VCP to butt aga<strong>in</strong>st. To add<br />

new sections of pipe as the pull progressed,<br />

additional rods were added followed<br />

by the pipe sections, which were<br />

slipped over the rods. The cyl<strong>in</strong>der pack<br />

with three pressure plates was then<br />

employed and p<strong>in</strong>ned to the rods. Next,<br />

the plate was hydraulically energized to<br />

serve two functions: 1) push the newly<br />

added pipe jo<strong>in</strong>t fully “home,” and 2)<br />

hold the entire jack<strong>in</strong>g pipe tra<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

compression as the pipe burst<strong>in</strong>g<br />

expander was pulled forward.<br />

The burst<strong>in</strong>g equipment for this project<br />

was designed and assembled for the<br />

specific purpose of burst<strong>in</strong>g the exist<strong>in</strong>g<br />

VCP and tow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the new nonrestra<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

jo<strong>in</strong>t jack<strong>in</strong>g VCP. A ride<br />

along hydrostatic mach<strong>in</strong>e attached to<br />

burst<strong>in</strong>g rods <strong>in</strong>side the new pipe sections<br />

kept the column of assembled pipe<br />

segments <strong>in</strong> compression as the burst<strong>in</strong>g<br />

progressed. The pipe sections were lowered<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the pit and the pipe jo<strong>in</strong>ts were<br />

pushed home with the cyl<strong>in</strong>der pack via<br />

a pressure plate. The cyl<strong>in</strong>der pack provided<br />

40 tons of force to keep the assembled<br />

pipe segments <strong>in</strong> compression (and<br />

28 ■ GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING ■ NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2009 www.govengr.com


ods <strong>in</strong> tension) as the burst<strong>in</strong>g head is<br />

pulled toward the Grundoburst static<br />

pipe burst<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e. The cyl<strong>in</strong>der<br />

pack was sized accord<strong>in</strong>g to the pipe<br />

manufacturers’ specification for the<br />

weight of each 18-<strong>in</strong>. diameter pipe section.<br />

For example, <strong>in</strong> a 400-l<strong>in</strong>ear ft (lf)<br />

run: 133 lb/lf x 400 lf=53,200 lb 27<br />

tons), which is well with<strong>in</strong> the limits of<br />

the cyl<strong>in</strong>der pack’s 40-ton capacity. As<br />

the burst<strong>in</strong>g head is pulled forward fractur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the exist<strong>in</strong>g VCP and expand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the fragments <strong>in</strong>to the surround<strong>in</strong>g<br />

backfill, the rear cyl<strong>in</strong>der pack pressure<br />

plate keeps the assembled pipe sections<br />

<strong>in</strong> compression.<br />

The contractor’s team kept <strong>in</strong> constant<br />

telephone/radio communication<br />

and the hydrostatic pressures were<br />

observed and recorded real-time dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the burst<strong>in</strong>g operation. To absorb these<br />

pressures, a chipboard compression r<strong>in</strong>g<br />

was <strong>in</strong>stalled between each pipe jo<strong>in</strong>t to<br />

distribute the axial load transferred from<br />

one pipe section to another. Cycle times<br />

for each section of pipe to be assembled<br />

and pulled forward dur<strong>in</strong>g burst<strong>in</strong>g<br />

began at an average rate of 1/2 ft per<br />

m<strong>in</strong>ute. As the project progressed, the<br />

crew became much more efficient<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> average rate of one ft per<br />

m<strong>in</strong>ute. Thus, a typical 350-ft reach was<br />

completed <strong>in</strong> 5 1/2 to six hours.<br />

Product <strong>Pipe</strong><br />

NO-DIG® vitrified clay jack<strong>in</strong>g pipe<br />

(Mission Clay Products, www.missionclay.com)<br />

was used as the replacement<br />

pipe material on the project. This gravity<br />

flow sewer pipe has been used for<br />

slurry microtunnel<strong>in</strong>g (MTBM), pilot<br />

tube microtunnel<strong>in</strong>g (GBM), slipl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

steel cas<strong>in</strong>g, and now static pull pipe<br />

burst<strong>in</strong>g. The vitrification process produces<br />

a material with average compressive<br />

strength of 18,000 psi. The jack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

pipes are manufactured with a precision<br />

ground jo<strong>in</strong>t; a Polyisoprene, EPDM, or<br />

Nitrile elastomer compression gasket;<br />

and a Series 316 sta<strong>in</strong>less steel collar at<br />

each pipe jo<strong>in</strong>t.<br />

The standard 6 1/2-ft length of 18-<strong>in</strong>.<br />

NO-DIG pipe utilizes a s<strong>in</strong>gle f<strong>in</strong> elastomer<br />

compression gasket with 4 3/4-<strong>in</strong>.<br />

wide, 16-gauge, 0.06-<strong>in</strong>. thick sta<strong>in</strong>less<br />

steel collars at each jo<strong>in</strong>t. It was decided<br />

on this project, due to the stra<strong>in</strong> on the<br />

The first pipe section on each burst<strong>in</strong>g run was fitted with a lubricant port and a<br />

“Witches Hat” check valve (<strong>in</strong>set) to reduce frictional pull<strong>in</strong>g forces.<br />

pipe jo<strong>in</strong>t dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>stallation<br />

process, to use a double f<strong>in</strong> elastomer<br />

gasket with a five-<strong>in</strong>. wide, 13-gauge,<br />

0.09-<strong>in</strong>. sta<strong>in</strong>less steel collar. This double<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ned jo<strong>in</strong>t with the heavier steel<br />

collar is the standard <strong>in</strong> pipe diameters<br />

24-<strong>in</strong>. and up.<br />

The first pipe section on each burst<strong>in</strong>g<br />

run, a three-ft sacrificial piece<br />

beh<strong>in</strong>d the expander, was fitted with a<br />

lubricant port to reduce frictional<br />

pull<strong>in</strong>g forces (pipe drag). This three-ft<br />

section placed the first “pivot<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

flexible” jo<strong>in</strong>t just outside the rear of the<br />

expander to allow movement as opposed<br />

to hav<strong>in</strong>g a full 6 1/2-ft pipe section. To<br />

manufacture the lube port the factory<br />

cored a 2 1/4-<strong>in</strong>. hole <strong>in</strong> the pipe barrel<br />

for a 1 1/2-<strong>in</strong>. National <strong>Pipe</strong> Thread<br />

(NPT) threaded coupl<strong>in</strong>g, attached<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g ceramic epoxy, to accept a 1 1/2-<br />

<strong>in</strong>. NPT “Witches Hat”" one way check<br />

valve. Microtunnel<strong>in</strong>g Inc. (www.microtunnel<strong>in</strong>g.com)<br />

supplied these check<br />

valves for the project.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Production rates were affected by<br />

unknown conditions such as a cementitious<br />

cap, dry dense soil conditions adjacent<br />

to the exist<strong>in</strong>g trench, and the<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g sewer pipe alignments. Another<br />

production delay orig<strong>in</strong>ated when the<br />

contractor opted to open-cut <strong>in</strong> lieu of<br />

pipe bust<strong>in</strong>g at one location. On the<br />

other hand, at two locations, open-cut<br />

was specified on the plans to correct<br />

reverse slopes and the contractor<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed approval to pipe burst at these<br />

locations. Not all of the construction<br />

delays can be attributed to this lack of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation. However, if more <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

about the orig<strong>in</strong>al trench geometry<br />

were known ahead of construction,<br />

unexpected delays <strong>in</strong> production could<br />

have been m<strong>in</strong>imized.<br />

<strong>Pipe</strong> production via pipe burst<strong>in</strong>g<br />

exceeded everyone’s expectations. The<br />

project took n<strong>in</strong>e months to complete<br />

the pipe burst<strong>in</strong>g and jack-and-bore<br />

activities. The contractor estimated that<br />

the project would have taken at least 12<br />

months to complete if it had been opencut.<br />

In addition to the construction<br />

duration sav<strong>in</strong>gs, the project accomplished<br />

a maximum drive length of 448<br />

ft. This is the longest length of jack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

VCP to be <strong>in</strong>stalled via pipe burst<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

the United States. In addition, the project<br />

was the first <strong>in</strong> the United States to<br />

perform a double upsize pipe burst<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g jack<strong>in</strong>g VCP.<br />

GE<br />

Mr. Webb is Water and Wastewater Director,<br />

Project Eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g Consultants, Ltd. Mr.<br />

Olsen is Construction Manager, City of<br />

<strong>Phoenix</strong>, Water Services Department,<br />

<strong>Phoenix</strong>, AZ.<br />

www.govengr.com GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING ■ NOVEMBER-DECEMBER 2009 ■ 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!