04.04.2014 Views

EU-SICHERHEITSDATENBLATT Dieselkraftstoff ... - Schmierstoffe

EU-SICHERHEITSDATENBLATT Dieselkraftstoff ... - Schmierstoffe

EU-SICHERHEITSDATENBLATT Dieselkraftstoff ... - Schmierstoffe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

method, the LLNA value was accepted as representative for the structure; where the<br />

LLNA test was not available, the GPMT value was taken (Patlewicz et al., 2007, Roberts<br />

et al., 2007).<br />

1.2.2.3. AMES Mutagenicity model<br />

The mutagenicity model (Serafimova et al., 2006) was derived on the basis of 345<br />

chemicals that were found experimentally to be positive without S-9 metabolic system<br />

and a further 2357 chemicals – including 2012 negatives, and 397 positives with S-9<br />

system. The simulator used for predicting metabolic activation of chemicals under S-9 is<br />

in fact predicting a mammalian liver metabolism where the settings of the simulator were<br />

adjusted in a way to avoid missing mutagenic metabolites. The simulator used in the<br />

model mimics formation of enzyme complexes and channeling effects. According to the<br />

adopted modeling scheme, the target chemicals are submitted to a metabolic simulator<br />

and generated metabolites are subsequently screened by the 3D QSAR model to identify<br />

mutagenic metabolites.<br />

1.2.2.4. Model for Chromosomal aberrations<br />

The model for chromosomal aberrations (CA) accounts for two principal types of<br />

interaction mechanisms – interactions with DNA and interactions with proteins or nuclear<br />

enzymes (Mekenyan et al., 2007). The model is used to predict metabolism in rat liver.<br />

The alerting groups associated with these mechanisms are defined by specific structural<br />

boundaries as well as by 2D and 3D parameter ranges describing effects of bioavailability<br />

and reactivity alerts that are conditioned by the rest of the molecule. The model was<br />

derived on the basis of 497 (166 positive and 331 negative) chemicals that have<br />

experimental data without S-9 metabolic system and other 162 chemicals – including 81<br />

positives, and 81 negatives with S-9 system. The performance of the model without<br />

metabolic activation was characterized by sensitivity and specificity values of 77% and<br />

82%, respectively. For the model coupled with the metabolic simulator (trained to<br />

reproduce documented maps for mammalian (mainly rat) liver metabolism of 332<br />

chemicals), the performance is 75% and 60% for sensitivity and specificity respectively.<br />

1.2.3 OASIS LMC Models: Toxicological models - Receptor mediated effects<br />

1.2.3.1. Androgen Binding Affinity QSAR model<br />

Some of the environmental and industrial chemicals can interact with the androgen<br />

receptor (AR) by mimicking the functions of natural hormones. The multiparameter<br />

formulation of COmmon REactivity PAttern (COREPA) (Mekenyan et al., 2004)<br />

approach was used to describe the structural requirements for eliciting androgen potency.<br />

A structurally diverse training data set containing 202 chemicals was obtained from the<br />

National Center for Toxicology Research (NCTR, US). The chemical affinities for the rat<br />

AR were related to distances between nucleophilic sites and structural features describing<br />

electronic interactions between the receptor and ligands.<br />

1.2.3.2. Estrogen binding affinity QSAR model<br />

The multiparameter formulation of COmmon REactivity PAttern (COREPA) (Mekenyan<br />

et al., 2004) approach was used to describe the structural requirements for eliciting<br />

estrogen binding potency. A training set of 645 chemicals which includes 497 steroid and<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!