04.04.2014 Views

EU-SICHERHEITSDATENBLATT Dieselkraftstoff ... - Schmierstoffe

EU-SICHERHEITSDATENBLATT Dieselkraftstoff ... - Schmierstoffe

EU-SICHERHEITSDATENBLATT Dieselkraftstoff ... - Schmierstoffe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

infinite number of structures including many variations and combinations of the classes<br />

and with increasing boiling point of a petroleum substance, this complexity will increase.<br />

For the purpose of this review only the basic structures will be evaluated and it is<br />

assumed that the application of this information to the more complex structures will be<br />

similar.<br />

The principle methods of predicting the metabolites utilises two sources of information;<br />

- the WWW and especially the site of the University of Minnesota<br />

- CATABOL and other published QSARs for biodegradation that predict metabolites<br />

To assess the potential for increased concern with metabolites over their parent<br />

compounds, either EPIsuite (US EPA 2009) or the OECD Tool Box (v1.1<br />

http://www.oecd.org/document/54/0,3343,en_2649_34379_42923638_1_1_1_1,00.html#<br />

Download_qsar_application_toolbox) or specific QSAR models e.g. OASIS, were used.<br />

In all cases the approach was based on a comparison with the parent compound. It is<br />

assumed that if the metabolite was less toxic, or more degradable than the parent<br />

compound, then the risk assessments of petroleum substances being undertaken by<br />

CONCAWE will be sufficiently protective of any metabolites that could be formed.<br />

Similarly, for a PBT assessment, the metabolites were firstly compared to the parent<br />

molecule and only for those parent molecules that may have a potential PBT concern<br />

were the metabolites further assessed for their specific PBT properties. The models and<br />

the basic approach are further outlined in the section below. Individual sections address<br />

each of the principle classes of hydrocarbons.<br />

1. Models and assessments<br />

1.1 Prediction of the metabolites<br />

For the purposes of this paper two sources of information were used. The first source<br />

was the World Wide Web and especially the site of the University of Minnesota (Ellis et<br />

al. 2006), at http://umbbd.msi.umn.edu/. This site contains information on over 900<br />

compounds, over 600 enzymes, nearly 1000 reactions and about 350 microorganism<br />

entries. There is a Pathway Prediction System (PPS) which is an open system for<br />

predicting microbial catabolism of organic compounds. Graphical display of PPS rules, a<br />

stand-alone version of the PPS and guidance for PPS users are also being developed.<br />

These references and others have been used to describe the general mechanisms by which<br />

hydrocarbons are degraded and hence the typical metabolites formed.<br />

The second source of information was the model CATABOL (Jaworska et al. 2002,<br />

supplied by the Laboratory of Mathematical Chemistry, Bourgas, http://oasis-lmc.org/).<br />

CATABOL is a degradation simulator, which includes a library of hierarchically ordered<br />

individual transformations (abiotic and enzymatic reactions) and a matching substructure<br />

engine providing their subsequent performance. The catabolic steps are derived from a<br />

set of most plausible metabolic pathways, predicted by experts for each chemical from<br />

the training set. The MITI-I database is used for that purpose, and provides the largest<br />

structural diversity and most consistent biodegradability assessments (O 2 yield during<br />

OECD 301 C test) among existing data collections. Subsequently, the transformation<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!