EU-SICHERHEITSDATENBLATT Dieselkraftstoff ... - Schmierstoffe
EU-SICHERHEITSDATENBLATT Dieselkraftstoff ... - Schmierstoffe EU-SICHERHEITSDATENBLATT Dieselkraftstoff ... - Schmierstoffe
2,6-dimethyldecane 11 10 No 2,2,4,6,6- pentamehtylheptane 23 13 Yes 2- isopropyl decalin 25 68 Yes EMBSI, 2007d SafePharm, 2004b EMBSI, 2008d Table 24. Chronic daphnia toxicity data for aliphatic hydrocarbons. Available information does not indicate di-naphthenic or poly-naphthenic hydrocarbons warrant classification as carcinogenic, mutagenic or reproductive toxicant, nor is there evidence of other long-term chronic toxicity hazards. For example, cis- and trans-decalin which forms the molecular backbone of di-naphthenic hydrocarbons is not classified for any of the endpoints used for toxicity assessment. Moreover, highly refined mineral oils, which are manufactured by hydrogenating petroleum streams that contain di and polyaromatics to form di- and polynaphthenic hydrocarbons, are well recognized to exhibit lower health hazards since aromatics are effectively removed. Such oils are not classified for any of the endpoints relevant for toxicity assessment (Boogaard et al. 2005). In summary, based on available evidence, neither C16-C18 di-naphthenic hydrocarbons nor C16-C22 poly-naphthenic hydrocarbons fulfill the criteria for toxicity. Reliable chronic toxicity data are not available for o-terphenyl which has a measured water solubility of 1.24 mg/l as cited by EPIsuite 4.0. Application of the target lipid model provides chronic NOEC predictions for algae, daphnia and trout of 4, 6 and 10 g/L, respectively. Given the solubility is well above the predicted NOECs coupled with the fact that two of the NOEC values are below the toxicity trigger of 10 g/L, it is concluded that o-terphenyl likely meets the toxicity criterion and may thus be a PBT substance. A recent review on terphenyls indicates the p- and m- isomers occur in nature. In contrast, o-terphenyls have not been reported to occur naturally (Liu, 2006). In fact, o- terphenyl is often used as a spike surrogate in environmental forensic analyses to discriminate different hydrocarbon sources because this substance is not present in petroleum substances. This anthropogenic origin likely explains the differences in observed persistence and bioaccumulation of o-terphenyl versus m- or p-terphenyls. Given that o-terphenyl is not present in crude oil feedstocks used to manufacture petroleum substances, this structure is not representative and is therefore not expected to be present in products at concentrations approaching 0.1% w/w. Therefore, while o- terphenyl may fulfill the PBT criteria, this conclusion does not impact PBT decisionmaking for petroleum substances. 7.0 Conclusions In order to comply with REACH requirements to perform a PBT assessment on complex petroleum substances, a systematic review of the persistence and bioaccumulation 66
properties of petroleum hydrocarbons was conducted. Consistent with REACH technical guidance and Annex XIII criteria, petroleum hydrocarbons were evaluated using a HCB scheme that divided these constituents into ten major classes by carbon number. Measured data and model predictions were used to develop an evidence-based conclusion for each HCB. The results of this analysis indicated that within a given HCB class, higher carbon numbers tended to fulfill the persistence criterion while lighter carbon numbers sometimes met the B criterion. None of the HCBs were found to meet the vB criterion, so no HCBs fulfill the vPvB criteria. Selected HCBs, namely C16-C18 di-naphthenic hydrocarbons and C16-C22 polynaphthenic hydrocarbons, were found to fulfill the P and B criteria. However, these blocks will not fulfill the toxicity critieria as they are not soluble enough to pose a chronic aquatic hazard and do not exhibit health hazard classifications. Therefore, it is concluded that none of the HCBs that comprise complex petroleum substances meet the PBT criteria. Anthracene has been agreed to fulfill the PBT criteria, so the percentage of this substance in complex petroleum substances must be considered. Since anthracene is derived principally from pyrogenic rather petrogenic sources, it is present at only trace levels in petroleum substances. 2DGC analysis has been used to characterize aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons in petroleum product categories. For substances with aromatic fractions greater than 5%, detailed PAH analysis has been performed. Anthracene concentrations determined from these analyses are summarized in Table 25. None of the 84 samples analysed contained anthracene at greater than 0.1% (or 1000 ppm). Category No. of samples No. of detects Mean anthracene level Range Lubricant Base 2 < 1.81 – 6.59 Oils a 9 2.60 ppm ppm Unrefined/Acid- 2 < 1.71 – 53.2 6 11.8 ppm Treated Oils ppm Kerosene d 13 2 # < 1.59 ppm Distillate Aromatic 2 < 1.79 - 13.2 Extracts d 6 3.80 ppm ppm Treated Distillate 0 Aromatic Extracts d 1 < 1.98 ppm - Residual Aromatic 2 # Extracts e 4 < 1.89 ppm Bitumen f 7 3 # < 1.94 ppm Heavy Fuel Oils g 9 9 91.1 ppm 0.3 - 425 ppm Gas Oils h 16 16 6.97 ppm 0.5 ppm Paraffin Waxes i 2 - - Petroleum Coke j 6 - - Foots Oil k 2 - - White Mineral Oils l 4 - - Slack Waxes m 6 - - Petrolatums n 2 - - 67
- Page 181 and 182: criterion. It can be concluded that
- Page 183 and 184: ioHCwin half-life (days) 100000.0 1
- Page 185 and 186: Hydrocarbon C nr BioHCwin Predicted
- Page 187 and 188: ioHCwin half-life (days) 1000000.0
- Page 189 and 190: ioHCwin half-life (days) 1000.0 100
- Page 191 and 192: Hydrocarbon C nr BioHCwin Predicted
- Page 193 and 194: enzo[a]pyrene 20 421.6 16.5 Table 1
- Page 195 and 196: (see Appendix 2). Since BCF predict
- Page 197 and 198: 10000 BCF (Arnot) 1000 100 10 1 n-P
- Page 199 and 200: exhibit BMFs near unity (Figure 28)
- Page 201 and 202: 2,2,4,4,6,8,8- heptamethyl nonane 1
- Page 203 and 204: Hydrocarbon C BMF BCF (Arnot) Dieta
- Page 205 and 206: BCF (regression) 100000 10000 1000
- Page 207 and 208: 4.5 Polynaphthenic hydrocarbons Reg
- Page 209 and 210: Experimental BMF 10 1 Polynaphth. D
- Page 211 and 212: enzene n-octylbenzene 14 0.034 403
- Page 213 and 214: 10000 1000 BCF (Arnot) 100 10 1 NMA
- Page 215 and 216: and appears to be an outlier. This
- Page 217 and 218: 4-ethylbiphenyl 14 863 1039 C Yakat
- Page 219 and 220: 100000 BCF (regression) 10000 1000
- Page 221 and 222: 10 Experimental BMF 1 0.1 NDiAr Die
- Page 223 and 224: Hydrocarbon C BMF Arnot BCF Dietary
- Page 225 and 226: Hydrocarbon C BMF Arnot BCF Dietary
- Page 227 and 228: Acenaphthene Acenaphthylene Benz(a)
- Page 229 and 230: 5.0 Summary of Persistence and Bioa
- Page 231: lower water solubility, it is possi
- Page 235 and 236: 8.0 References Anonymous (2004). Fi
- Page 237 and 238: EMBSI (2007c). Fish, dietary bioacc
- Page 239 and 240: Prince RC, Walters CC. (2007). Biod
- Page 241 and 242: Appendix 1. Hydrocarbon structures
- Page 243 and 244: iP 14 2,4,10-Trimethylundecane CC(C
- Page 245 and 246: MN 7 1,2-Dimethylcyclopentane CC1C(
- Page 247 and 248: MN 14 n-Nonylcyclopentane CCCCCCCCC
- Page 249 and 250: MN 29 MN 29 MN 30 n-Tetracosylcyclo
- Page 251 and 252: hexahydroindane DN 20 2,4-dimethylo
- Page 253 and 254: PN 27 Phenanthrene 2,6-dimethylhept
- Page 255 and 256: MAr 13 1-Methyl-3-hexylbenzene Cc1c
- Page 257 and 258: NMAr 12 n-Propylindan c1ccc2CC(CCC)
- Page 259 and 260: NMAr 24 c1cc(CC(C)CCCC(C)CCCCC)c2CC
- Page 261 and 262: NMAr 29 NMAr 29 NMAr 29 NMAr 29 NMA
- Page 263 and 264: DAr 16 2-Hexylnaphthalene CCCCCCc1c
- Page 265 and 266: NDAr 16 n-Butylacenaphthene c12cccc
- Page 267 and 268: NDAr 26 Dimethyloctyl-1,2,3,6,7,8-
- Page 269 and 270: PAr 19 Ethylbenzo(a)fluorene C3c1cc
- Page 271 and 272: PAr 22 n-Pentylbenzo(a)fluorene C3c
- Page 273 and 274: PAr 28 Isohexyl-octadecahydro-picen
- Page 275 and 276: Appendix 3. CONCAWE Position Paper
- Page 277 and 278: probabilities are adjusted to best
- Page 279 and 280: 1.2.2 OASIS LMC Models: Toxicologic
- Page 281 and 282: environmental chemicals (database o
properties of petroleum hydrocarbons was conducted. Consistent with REACH technical<br />
guidance and Annex XIII criteria, petroleum hydrocarbons were evaluated using a HCB<br />
scheme that divided these constituents into ten major classes by carbon number.<br />
Measured data and model predictions were used to develop an evidence-based conclusion<br />
for each HCB.<br />
The results of this analysis indicated that within a given HCB class, higher carbon<br />
numbers tended to fulfill the persistence criterion while lighter carbon numbers<br />
sometimes met the B criterion. None of the HCBs were found to meet the vB criterion,<br />
so no HCBs fulfill the vPvB criteria.<br />
Selected HCBs, namely C16-C18 di-naphthenic hydrocarbons and C16-C22 polynaphthenic<br />
hydrocarbons, were found to fulfill the P and B criteria. However, these<br />
blocks will not fulfill the toxicity critieria as they are not soluble enough to pose a<br />
chronic aquatic hazard and do not exhibit health hazard classifications. Therefore, it is<br />
concluded that none of the HCBs that comprise complex petroleum substances meet the<br />
PBT criteria.<br />
Anthracene has been agreed to fulfill the PBT criteria, so the percentage of this substance<br />
in complex petroleum substances must be considered. Since anthracene is derived<br />
principally from pyrogenic rather petrogenic sources, it is present at only trace levels in<br />
petroleum substances. 2DGC analysis has been used to characterize aliphatic and<br />
aromatic hydrocarbons in petroleum product categories. For substances with aromatic<br />
fractions greater than 5%, detailed PAH analysis has been performed. Anthracene<br />
concentrations determined from these analyses are summarized in Table 25. None of the<br />
84 samples analysed contained anthracene at greater than 0.1% (or 1000 ppm).<br />
Category No. of samples No. of<br />
detects<br />
Mean<br />
anthracene<br />
level<br />
Range<br />
Lubricant Base<br />
2<br />
< 1.81 – 6.59<br />
Oils a 9<br />
2.60 ppm<br />
ppm<br />
Unrefined/Acid-<br />
2<br />
< 1.71 – 53.2<br />
6<br />
11.8 ppm<br />
Treated Oils<br />
ppm<br />
Kerosene d 13 2 # < 1.59 ppm<br />
Distillate Aromatic<br />
2<br />
< 1.79 - 13.2<br />
Extracts d 6<br />
3.80 ppm<br />
ppm<br />
Treated Distillate<br />
0<br />
Aromatic Extracts d 1<br />
< 1.98 ppm -<br />
Residual Aromatic<br />
2 #<br />
Extracts e 4<br />
< 1.89 ppm<br />
Bitumen f 7 3 # < 1.94 ppm<br />
Heavy Fuel Oils g 9 9 91.1 ppm 0.3 - 425 ppm<br />
Gas Oils h 16 16 6.97 ppm 0.5 ppm<br />
Paraffin Waxes i 2 - -<br />
Petroleum Coke j 6 - -<br />
Foots Oil k 2 - -<br />
White Mineral Oils l 4 - -<br />
Slack Waxes m 6 - -<br />
Petrolatums n 2 - -<br />
67