EU-SICHERHEITSDATENBLATT Dieselkraftstoff ... - Schmierstoffe

EU-SICHERHEITSDATENBLATT Dieselkraftstoff ... - Schmierstoffe EU-SICHERHEITSDATENBLATT Dieselkraftstoff ... - Schmierstoffe

eni.datenblatt.de
from eni.datenblatt.de More from this publisher
04.04.2014 Views

2,6-dimethyldecane 11 10 No 2,2,4,6,6- pentamehtylheptane 23 13 Yes 2- isopropyl decalin 25 68 Yes EMBSI, 2007d SafePharm, 2004b EMBSI, 2008d Table 24. Chronic daphnia toxicity data for aliphatic hydrocarbons. Available information does not indicate di-naphthenic or poly-naphthenic hydrocarbons warrant classification as carcinogenic, mutagenic or reproductive toxicant, nor is there evidence of other long-term chronic toxicity hazards. For example, cis- and trans-decalin which forms the molecular backbone of di-naphthenic hydrocarbons is not classified for any of the endpoints used for toxicity assessment. Moreover, highly refined mineral oils, which are manufactured by hydrogenating petroleum streams that contain di and polyaromatics to form di- and polynaphthenic hydrocarbons, are well recognized to exhibit lower health hazards since aromatics are effectively removed. Such oils are not classified for any of the endpoints relevant for toxicity assessment (Boogaard et al. 2005). In summary, based on available evidence, neither C16-C18 di-naphthenic hydrocarbons nor C16-C22 poly-naphthenic hydrocarbons fulfill the criteria for toxicity. Reliable chronic toxicity data are not available for o-terphenyl which has a measured water solubility of 1.24 mg/l as cited by EPIsuite 4.0. Application of the target lipid model provides chronic NOEC predictions for algae, daphnia and trout of 4, 6 and 10 g/L, respectively. Given the solubility is well above the predicted NOECs coupled with the fact that two of the NOEC values are below the toxicity trigger of 10 g/L, it is concluded that o-terphenyl likely meets the toxicity criterion and may thus be a PBT substance. A recent review on terphenyls indicates the p- and m- isomers occur in nature. In contrast, o-terphenyls have not been reported to occur naturally (Liu, 2006). In fact, o- terphenyl is often used as a spike surrogate in environmental forensic analyses to discriminate different hydrocarbon sources because this substance is not present in petroleum substances. This anthropogenic origin likely explains the differences in observed persistence and bioaccumulation of o-terphenyl versus m- or p-terphenyls. Given that o-terphenyl is not present in crude oil feedstocks used to manufacture petroleum substances, this structure is not representative and is therefore not expected to be present in products at concentrations approaching 0.1% w/w. Therefore, while o- terphenyl may fulfill the PBT criteria, this conclusion does not impact PBT decisionmaking for petroleum substances. 7.0 Conclusions In order to comply with REACH requirements to perform a PBT assessment on complex petroleum substances, a systematic review of the persistence and bioaccumulation 66

properties of petroleum hydrocarbons was conducted. Consistent with REACH technical guidance and Annex XIII criteria, petroleum hydrocarbons were evaluated using a HCB scheme that divided these constituents into ten major classes by carbon number. Measured data and model predictions were used to develop an evidence-based conclusion for each HCB. The results of this analysis indicated that within a given HCB class, higher carbon numbers tended to fulfill the persistence criterion while lighter carbon numbers sometimes met the B criterion. None of the HCBs were found to meet the vB criterion, so no HCBs fulfill the vPvB criteria. Selected HCBs, namely C16-C18 di-naphthenic hydrocarbons and C16-C22 polynaphthenic hydrocarbons, were found to fulfill the P and B criteria. However, these blocks will not fulfill the toxicity critieria as they are not soluble enough to pose a chronic aquatic hazard and do not exhibit health hazard classifications. Therefore, it is concluded that none of the HCBs that comprise complex petroleum substances meet the PBT criteria. Anthracene has been agreed to fulfill the PBT criteria, so the percentage of this substance in complex petroleum substances must be considered. Since anthracene is derived principally from pyrogenic rather petrogenic sources, it is present at only trace levels in petroleum substances. 2DGC analysis has been used to characterize aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons in petroleum product categories. For substances with aromatic fractions greater than 5%, detailed PAH analysis has been performed. Anthracene concentrations determined from these analyses are summarized in Table 25. None of the 84 samples analysed contained anthracene at greater than 0.1% (or 1000 ppm). Category No. of samples No. of detects Mean anthracene level Range Lubricant Base 2 < 1.81 – 6.59 Oils a 9 2.60 ppm ppm Unrefined/Acid- 2 < 1.71 – 53.2 6 11.8 ppm Treated Oils ppm Kerosene d 13 2 # < 1.59 ppm Distillate Aromatic 2 < 1.79 - 13.2 Extracts d 6 3.80 ppm ppm Treated Distillate 0 Aromatic Extracts d 1 < 1.98 ppm - Residual Aromatic 2 # Extracts e 4 < 1.89 ppm Bitumen f 7 3 # < 1.94 ppm Heavy Fuel Oils g 9 9 91.1 ppm 0.3 - 425 ppm Gas Oils h 16 16 6.97 ppm 0.5 ppm Paraffin Waxes i 2 - - Petroleum Coke j 6 - - Foots Oil k 2 - - White Mineral Oils l 4 - - Slack Waxes m 6 - - Petrolatums n 2 - - 67

properties of petroleum hydrocarbons was conducted. Consistent with REACH technical<br />

guidance and Annex XIII criteria, petroleum hydrocarbons were evaluated using a HCB<br />

scheme that divided these constituents into ten major classes by carbon number.<br />

Measured data and model predictions were used to develop an evidence-based conclusion<br />

for each HCB.<br />

The results of this analysis indicated that within a given HCB class, higher carbon<br />

numbers tended to fulfill the persistence criterion while lighter carbon numbers<br />

sometimes met the B criterion. None of the HCBs were found to meet the vB criterion,<br />

so no HCBs fulfill the vPvB criteria.<br />

Selected HCBs, namely C16-C18 di-naphthenic hydrocarbons and C16-C22 polynaphthenic<br />

hydrocarbons, were found to fulfill the P and B criteria. However, these<br />

blocks will not fulfill the toxicity critieria as they are not soluble enough to pose a<br />

chronic aquatic hazard and do not exhibit health hazard classifications. Therefore, it is<br />

concluded that none of the HCBs that comprise complex petroleum substances meet the<br />

PBT criteria.<br />

Anthracene has been agreed to fulfill the PBT criteria, so the percentage of this substance<br />

in complex petroleum substances must be considered. Since anthracene is derived<br />

principally from pyrogenic rather petrogenic sources, it is present at only trace levels in<br />

petroleum substances. 2DGC analysis has been used to characterize aliphatic and<br />

aromatic hydrocarbons in petroleum product categories. For substances with aromatic<br />

fractions greater than 5%, detailed PAH analysis has been performed. Anthracene<br />

concentrations determined from these analyses are summarized in Table 25. None of the<br />

84 samples analysed contained anthracene at greater than 0.1% (or 1000 ppm).<br />

Category No. of samples No. of<br />

detects<br />

Mean<br />

anthracene<br />

level<br />

Range<br />

Lubricant Base<br />

2<br />

< 1.81 – 6.59<br />

Oils a 9<br />

2.60 ppm<br />

ppm<br />

Unrefined/Acid-<br />

2<br />

< 1.71 – 53.2<br />

6<br />

11.8 ppm<br />

Treated Oils<br />

ppm<br />

Kerosene d 13 2 # < 1.59 ppm<br />

Distillate Aromatic<br />

2<br />

< 1.79 - 13.2<br />

Extracts d 6<br />

3.80 ppm<br />

ppm<br />

Treated Distillate<br />

0<br />

Aromatic Extracts d 1<br />

< 1.98 ppm -<br />

Residual Aromatic<br />

2 #<br />

Extracts e 4<br />

< 1.89 ppm<br />

Bitumen f 7 3 # < 1.94 ppm<br />

Heavy Fuel Oils g 9 9 91.1 ppm 0.3 - 425 ppm<br />

Gas Oils h 16 16 6.97 ppm 0.5 ppm<br />

Paraffin Waxes i 2 - -<br />

Petroleum Coke j 6 - -<br />

Foots Oil k 2 - -<br />

White Mineral Oils l 4 - -<br />

Slack Waxes m 6 - -<br />

Petrolatums n 2 - -<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!