EU-SICHERHEITSDATENBLATT Dieselkraftstoff ... - Schmierstoffe

EU-SICHERHEITSDATENBLATT Dieselkraftstoff ... - Schmierstoffe EU-SICHERHEITSDATENBLATT Dieselkraftstoff ... - Schmierstoffe

eni.datenblatt.de
from eni.datenblatt.de More from this publisher
04.04.2014 Views

Hydrocarbon C BMF BCF Arnot Dietary BCF Aqueous BCF Species hexadecahydropyrene 16 1.02 4084 19451 4955 RT isopropyl hydrophenanthrene 1-methyl-7- (isopropyl)- hydrophenanthrene 17 0.448 3563 11595 RT 18 0.35 2872 7607 RT perhydrochrysene 18 0.376 4871 9691 RT 1,1':3', 1"- tercyclohexane hydrogenated terphenyl 18 0.44 95 282 RT Reference EMBSI, 2008a, 2009b EMBSI, 2006b EMBSI, 2008a EMBSI, 2008b EMBSI, 2008c 18 4650 C CITI, 1992 Table 15. Experimentally derived dietary and aqueous bioaccumulation data for polynaphthenic hydrocarbons. BCF (Arnot) is the predicted BCF using Arnot’s equations incorporating metabolism (Arnot and Gobas 2003). RT: rainbow trout; C: carp. Bold blue entries represent BCF values between the B criterion (2000) and the vB criterion (5000). Bold red entries represent BCF values above the vB criterion (5000). Experimental BCF 100000 10000 1000 Polynaphth. Dietary BCF Polynaphth. Aqueous BCF B vB 100 15 16 17 18 19 20 Carbon Number Figure 39. Experimentally derived fish BCFs for polynaphthenic hydrocarbons. B – 2000, vB - 5000 42

Experimental BMF 10 1 Polynaphth. Dietary BMF BMF = 1 0.1 15 16 17 18 19 20 Carbon Number Figure 40. Experimentally derived fish BMFs for polynaphthenic hydrocarbons from dietary bioaccumulation studies 4.6 Mono-Aromatics Regression method BCF predictions for mono-aromatics (Figure 41) are above the B criterion of 2000 for structures ranging from C12 to C17. When biotransformation is incorporated to the model, none of the BCF predictions are above 2000 (Figure 42). Dietary BCF values, which are typically more conservative than aqueous BCF values, are below the B criterion for all tested structures (C9 to C16) except 1,3,5-tris(1- methylethyl)-benzene (triisopropyl benzene, Table 16). However, this compound is not representative of petroleum hydrocarbon structures and is therefore not used for B assessment of this HCB. Aqueous BCFs for all other monoaromatics are below 2000. Experimental BMF factors derived from dietary data (Figure 44) are consistently well below 1. It can be concluded that based on the available data, mono-aromatic hydrocarbons, as a class, are neither bioaccumulative nor very bioaccumulative. BCF (regression) 100000 10000 1000 100 10 Monoaromatics B vB 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Carbon Number Figure 41. Predicted fish BCFs for mono-aromatic hydrocarbons using the regressionbased approach in BCFBAF. B – 2000, vB - 5000 43

Experimental BMF<br />

10<br />

1<br />

Polynaphth. Dietary BMF<br />

BMF = 1<br />

0.1<br />

15 16 17 18 19 20<br />

Carbon Number<br />

Figure 40. Experimentally derived fish BMFs for polynaphthenic hydrocarbons from<br />

dietary bioaccumulation studies<br />

4.6 Mono-Aromatics<br />

Regression method BCF predictions for mono-aromatics (Figure 41) are above the B<br />

criterion of 2000 for structures ranging from C12 to C17. When biotransformation is<br />

incorporated to the model, none of the BCF predictions are above 2000 (Figure 42).<br />

Dietary BCF values, which are typically more conservative than aqueous BCF values, are<br />

below the B criterion for all tested structures (C9 to C16) except 1,3,5-tris(1-<br />

methylethyl)-benzene (triisopropyl benzene, Table 16). However, this compound is not<br />

representative of petroleum hydrocarbon structures and is therefore not used for B<br />

assessment of this HCB. Aqueous BCFs for all other monoaromatics are below 2000.<br />

Experimental BMF factors derived from dietary data (Figure 44) are consistently well<br />

below 1. It can be concluded that based on the available data, mono-aromatic<br />

hydrocarbons, as a class, are neither bioaccumulative nor very bioaccumulative.<br />

BCF (regression)<br />

100000<br />

10000<br />

1000<br />

100<br />

10<br />

Monoaromatics<br />

B<br />

vB<br />

1<br />

5 10 15 20 25 30 35<br />

Carbon Number<br />

Figure 41. Predicted fish BCFs for mono-aromatic hydrocarbons using the regressionbased<br />

approach in BCFBAF. B – 2000, vB - 5000<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!