Download PDF Version Revolt Magazine, Volume 1 Issue No.4
Download PDF Version Revolt Magazine, Volume 1 Issue No.4
Download PDF Version Revolt Magazine, Volume 1 Issue No.4
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the Black Power Movement on the attitudes of black<br />
Princeton students during the 70s. Hannity claimed<br />
that she herself held, “the belief that blacks must<br />
join in solidarity to combat a white oppressor.”<br />
Failing to note that the First Lady’s thesis goes on<br />
to say, “One can contrast the mood of the campus<br />
years ago and the level of attachment to Blacks to<br />
that of the present mood on the campus [in 1985]<br />
which is more pro-integrationist.” Hannity posed<br />
a rhetorical question on his program, saying, “She<br />
talked about why African-Americans joined together<br />
at Princeton. Is race going to now be an issue for<br />
them?" The irony of Hannity’s statement is that he<br />
fails to see that it is precisely this type of discourse,<br />
which programs such as his proliferate, that makes<br />
race a serious issue for this presidency every single<br />
day. Not because the Obamas are attempting to<br />
push some radical Black Panther agenda, but<br />
because they are never permitted to forget about<br />
the color of their skin. Much of the right-wing<br />
media’s criticism focuses around the issues of race;<br />
whether they believe the Obama’s to be pandering<br />
to minorities, plotting some sort of black American<br />
revolution, accusing Obama of manipulating the<br />
public with his “coolness” (read: blackness), or<br />
accusing him of lying about his Kenyan origins.<br />
Hannity couldn’t even muster support for his<br />
conspiracy theories amongst his guests, including<br />
Tennessee Republican Congressman Harold Ford<br />
Jr. who replied to Hannity’s line of anti-patriotic<br />
questioning by saying, “If we're looking back to how<br />
spouses of presidential candidates, when they were<br />
students in elementary and junior high and middle<br />
and high school and even college, to determine<br />
whether or not their husband or their spouse<br />
is fit to be president, I think we've sunk to a new<br />
low. Michelle Obama is a model for what anybody<br />
would want their daughter to be. She's smart. Not<br />
only a -- wonderfully capable and accomplished<br />
academically, but she's an incredible mom.”<br />
But, clearly, Michelle Obama was not always viewed<br />
as an ideal role model and mother, certainly by<br />
some of her husband’s right-wing constituents, but,<br />
also, surprisingly, by some left-leaning publications.<br />
During his first presidential campaign, The New<br />
Yorker published a cartoon on their cover portraying<br />
Mrs. Obama with an afro and machine gun giving<br />
Barack a “terrorist fist jab,” implying the radical,<br />
revolutionary Obamas had infiltrated the White<br />
House. However, The New Yorker cover for the<br />
March 16, 2009 issue, a mere year later, shows how<br />
quickly Michelle’s public persona was manipulated<br />
and transformed by the media and spun by the<br />
White House. The 2009 cover shows her walking<br />
the runway in three different stylish outfits. This is<br />
the perfect illustrative example of both the media’s<br />
attempt to mollify or domesticate the image of the<br />
First Lady and the larger dichotomy at hand, which<br />
women in politics must face every day. Either she is<br />
her husband’s co-conspirator, plotting some grand,<br />
black radical takeover of America, or she is the<br />
consummate fashion plate who can’t be bothered<br />
with America’s poor and disenfranchised. As a<br />
woman in the American political limelight, you’re<br />
afforded two possible identities, either that of an<br />
intelligent, shrewd harpie or a vain, thoughtless<br />
socialite. Women’s identities can be condensed<br />
down to these rudimentary understandings, unlike<br />
their male counterparts who are permitted to be as<br />
complex, diverse, and often contradictory as they<br />
like.<br />
Michelle Obama doesn’t fit America’s racial<br />
stereotype of what a black woman should be, so<br />
she’s degraded and insulted and marginalized by<br />
the media until they can find a way to make her fit<br />
into their preconceived notions. We’ve created a<br />
culture surrounding the White House where it’s not<br />
only permissible to say any passing racist or sexist<br />
remark that comes to mind, but it’s all right to gossipmonger,<br />
speculate and fabricate whatever story or<br />
quote is needed in order to support the argument<br />
against a black President and First Lady who were<br />
democratically elected into office. One can’t imagine<br />
these types of lewd and divisive statements being<br />
made about any former president, let alone their<br />
wives. America may have elected their first black<br />
President into office, but we still have an incredibly<br />
long road towards equality, of all kinds, ahead of us.<br />
REVOLT<br />
<strong>Magazine</strong> Number 4, 2013 18