03.04.2014 Views

Download PDF Version Revolt Magazine, Volume 1 Issue No.4

Download PDF Version Revolt Magazine, Volume 1 Issue No.4

Download PDF Version Revolt Magazine, Volume 1 Issue No.4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the Black Power Movement on the attitudes of black<br />

Princeton students during the 70s. Hannity claimed<br />

that she herself held, “the belief that blacks must<br />

join in solidarity to combat a white oppressor.”<br />

Failing to note that the First Lady’s thesis goes on<br />

to say, “One can contrast the mood of the campus<br />

years ago and the level of attachment to Blacks to<br />

that of the present mood on the campus [in 1985]<br />

which is more pro-integrationist.” Hannity posed<br />

a rhetorical question on his program, saying, “She<br />

talked about why African-Americans joined together<br />

at Princeton. Is race going to now be an issue for<br />

them?" The irony of Hannity’s statement is that he<br />

fails to see that it is precisely this type of discourse,<br />

which programs such as his proliferate, that makes<br />

race a serious issue for this presidency every single<br />

day. Not because the Obamas are attempting to<br />

push some radical Black Panther agenda, but<br />

because they are never permitted to forget about<br />

the color of their skin. Much of the right-wing<br />

media’s criticism focuses around the issues of race;<br />

whether they believe the Obama’s to be pandering<br />

to minorities, plotting some sort of black American<br />

revolution, accusing Obama of manipulating the<br />

public with his “coolness” (read: blackness), or<br />

accusing him of lying about his Kenyan origins.<br />

Hannity couldn’t even muster support for his<br />

conspiracy theories amongst his guests, including<br />

Tennessee Republican Congressman Harold Ford<br />

Jr. who replied to Hannity’s line of anti-patriotic<br />

questioning by saying, “If we're looking back to how<br />

spouses of presidential candidates, when they were<br />

students in elementary and junior high and middle<br />

and high school and even college, to determine<br />

whether or not their husband or their spouse<br />

is fit to be president, I think we've sunk to a new<br />

low. Michelle Obama is a model for what anybody<br />

would want their daughter to be. She's smart. Not<br />

only a -- wonderfully capable and accomplished<br />

academically, but she's an incredible mom.”<br />

But, clearly, Michelle Obama was not always viewed<br />

as an ideal role model and mother, certainly by<br />

some of her husband’s right-wing constituents, but,<br />

also, surprisingly, by some left-leaning publications.<br />

During his first presidential campaign, The New<br />

Yorker published a cartoon on their cover portraying<br />

Mrs. Obama with an afro and machine gun giving<br />

Barack a “terrorist fist jab,” implying the radical,<br />

revolutionary Obamas had infiltrated the White<br />

House. However, The New Yorker cover for the<br />

March 16, 2009 issue, a mere year later, shows how<br />

quickly Michelle’s public persona was manipulated<br />

and transformed by the media and spun by the<br />

White House. The 2009 cover shows her walking<br />

the runway in three different stylish outfits. This is<br />

the perfect illustrative example of both the media’s<br />

attempt to mollify or domesticate the image of the<br />

First Lady and the larger dichotomy at hand, which<br />

women in politics must face every day. Either she is<br />

her husband’s co-conspirator, plotting some grand,<br />

black radical takeover of America, or she is the<br />

consummate fashion plate who can’t be bothered<br />

with America’s poor and disenfranchised. As a<br />

woman in the American political limelight, you’re<br />

afforded two possible identities, either that of an<br />

intelligent, shrewd harpie or a vain, thoughtless<br />

socialite. Women’s identities can be condensed<br />

down to these rudimentary understandings, unlike<br />

their male counterparts who are permitted to be as<br />

complex, diverse, and often contradictory as they<br />

like.<br />

Michelle Obama doesn’t fit America’s racial<br />

stereotype of what a black woman should be, so<br />

she’s degraded and insulted and marginalized by<br />

the media until they can find a way to make her fit<br />

into their preconceived notions. We’ve created a<br />

culture surrounding the White House where it’s not<br />

only permissible to say any passing racist or sexist<br />

remark that comes to mind, but it’s all right to gossipmonger,<br />

speculate and fabricate whatever story or<br />

quote is needed in order to support the argument<br />

against a black President and First Lady who were<br />

democratically elected into office. One can’t imagine<br />

these types of lewd and divisive statements being<br />

made about any former president, let alone their<br />

wives. America may have elected their first black<br />

President into office, but we still have an incredibly<br />

long road towards equality, of all kinds, ahead of us.<br />

REVOLT<br />

<strong>Magazine</strong> Number 4, 2013 18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!