03.04.2014 Views

quick reference chart and notes for determining immigration - ILRC

quick reference chart and notes for determining immigration - ILRC

quick reference chart and notes for determining immigration - ILRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Quick Reference Chart <strong>and</strong> Notes<br />

February 2010<br />

Paraphernalia <strong>and</strong> the 30 grams marijuana benefit. Where a paraphernalia offense<br />

relates to a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana – e.g.,<br />

possession of a marijuana pipe – it will receive the same benefits as the simple possession<br />

offense. 114 A single conviction <strong>for</strong> simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana is an<br />

exception to the controlled substance conviction deportation ground, <strong>and</strong> is eligible <strong>for</strong> treatment<br />

under the § 212(h) waiver <strong>for</strong> inadmissibility based on conviction of a controlled substance.<br />

See further discussion in Part C.2, infra.<br />

2. Plead to Accessory after the Fact<br />

Accessory is a good alternate plea to a drug offense. Being an accessory to a drug<br />

offense is not considered an offense “relating to controlled substances” <strong>and</strong> so does not make the<br />

noncitizen deportable or inadmissible <strong>for</strong> having a drug conviction.<br />

The BIA held that federal accessory after the fact is an aggravated felony as obstruction<br />

of justice, if a sentence of a year or more is imposed. Matter of Batista-Hern<strong>and</strong>ez, 21 I&N Dec.<br />

955 (BIA 1997). Counsel should avoid a sentence of a year or more <strong>for</strong> any one count. If that is<br />

not possible, counsel should plead specifically to conduct that impeded the initial apprehension<br />

of the principal, be<strong>for</strong>e criminal proceedings were brought in court (or at least, leave the record<br />

open to that possibility). This will give <strong>immigration</strong> counsel a strong argument that the offense<br />

is not an aggravated felony. See discussion at § N.14 Safer Pleas, Part G, infra.<br />

Criminal defense counsel should assume conservatively that accessory after the fact will<br />

be held a crime involving moral turpitude. However, there is a good chance that the Ninth<br />

Circuit will stick to its position that this is not the case, <strong>and</strong> <strong>immigration</strong> counsel should not<br />

concede the point. 115 See discussion in Note: Crimes Involving Moral Turpitude <strong>and</strong> further<br />

discussion of accessory at Note: Safer Pleas.<br />

C. Simple Possession or Less, as an Aggravated Felony <strong>and</strong> Under Lujan-Armendariz<br />

Current rules. The following is the st<strong>and</strong>ard regarding when a conviction <strong>for</strong> simple<br />

possession of a controlled substance is an aggravated felony in <strong>immigration</strong> <strong>and</strong> federal criminal<br />

proceedings in the Ninth Circuit. These rules are summarized in the drug plea Chart following<br />

this Note, at Part F.<br />

1. A conviction <strong>for</strong> even a minor offense relating to controlled substances—such as simple<br />

possession, under the influence, or possession of paraphernalia—will make a noncitizen<br />

114 Matter of Martinez-Espinoza, supra.<br />

115 Navarro-Lopez v. Gonzales, 503 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2007)(en banc) held that accessory after the fact<br />

categorically cannot be a crime involving moral turpitude. The BIA held that the similar misprision of felony is a<br />

CIMT. Matter of Robles, 24 I&N Dec. 22 (BIA 2006) (misprision of felony under 8 USC §4) (Ninth Circuit appeal<br />

pending). Recently, however, the Ninth Circuit en banc held that it will defer to the BIA’s holding that an offense<br />

involves moral turpitude, if the holding is reasonable. Marmolejo-Campos v. Holder, 558 F.3d 903 (9 th Cir. 2009)<br />

(en banc) (petition <strong>for</strong> certiorari pending at the Supreme Court).<br />

Immigrant Legal Resource Center N-73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!