03.04.2014 Views

quick reference chart and notes for determining immigration - ILRC

quick reference chart and notes for determining immigration - ILRC

quick reference chart and notes for determining immigration - ILRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Quick Reference Chart <strong>and</strong> Notes<br />

February 2010<br />

Example 2: Sam receives a second Cali<strong>for</strong>nia felony conviction <strong>for</strong> simple possession of<br />

heroin. The prior possession conviction is not pleaded or proved at the second prosecution.<br />

Aggravated felony? A simple possession conviction (other than flunitrazepam or more than 5<br />

grams of cocaine base) is not an aggravated felony unless a prior drug conviction was pleaded<br />

<strong>and</strong> proved, according to the U.S. Supreme Court <strong>and</strong> the BIA. Thus Sam’s plea is not an<br />

aggravated felony.<br />

Deportable? This conviction, like his first one, makes Sam inadmissible <strong>and</strong> deportable.<br />

Rehabilitative relief? Because it is the second conviction, it will not be eliminated by<br />

“rehabilitative relief.”<br />

Example 3: Esteban participated in a pre-plea diversion program in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia in 1995,<br />

where he did not admit any guilt but did accept counseling, after which the charges were<br />

dropped.<br />

Aggravated felony? No. Because there was no plea or finding of guilt, this is not a conviction at<br />

all <strong>for</strong> <strong>immigration</strong> purposes. Deportable? This is not a conviction, <strong>and</strong> so would not be a<br />

deportable drug conviction. Rehabilitative relief? No relief is required, because this is not a<br />

conviction. However, see next question <strong>for</strong> its effect on Esteban’s ability to eliminate the<br />

<strong>immigration</strong> consequences of a future conviction by “rehabilitative relief.”<br />

Example 4: Esteban pleads guilty to simple possession of methamphetamine.<br />

Aggravated felony? While there is no case on point, it should not be so held. A simple<br />

possession conviction where there are no prior controlled substance convictions is not an<br />

aggravated felony, unless it involves flunitrazepam or more than 5 grams of crack cocaine.<br />

Because the prior pre-plea diversion was not a conviction, this conviction should not be an<br />

aggravated felony. Deportable? Yes, he is deportable based on a conviction relating to a<br />

controlled substance. Rehabilitative relief? No. While normally rehabilitative relief<br />

withdrawing a plea would eliminate a first conviction under Lujan-Armendariz, the Ninth Circuit<br />

has held that receipt of a prior pre-plea diversion bars this benefit – even though the pre-plea<br />

diversion was not a conviction. There<strong>for</strong>e an expungement, DEJ or other treatment withdrawing<br />

this plea will not be given <strong>immigration</strong> effect.<br />

Example 5: Lani is convicted of simple possession of more than 5 grams of crack<br />

cocaine in state court, her first-ever drug conviction.<br />

Aggravated felony? This will be held an aggravated felony. A first conviction <strong>for</strong> possession of<br />

flunitrazepam or more than 5 grams of crack cocaine is an aggravated felony. Deportable? It<br />

would make her deportable <strong>and</strong> inadmissible <strong>for</strong> a drug conviction. Rehabilitative relief? If it<br />

was a very first conviction of simple possession, Lani can eliminate it <strong>for</strong> <strong>immigration</strong> purposes<br />

by “rehabilitative relief.”<br />

Immigrant Legal Resource Center N-77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!