Which Alice?

ALICE IN PUZZLE-LAND
either told the truth, so did the other who agreed with him) and
that C told the truth. Then either C accused himself and was guilty,
or he accused A and A was guilty, but there is no way to tell which.
So Humpty Dumpty couldn't have known who was guilty in this
case.
The only possibility that Humpty Dumpty could have known who
was guilty is that he was told that exactly two statements were true.
This means that A, B both told the truth (because their statements
agreed, so if one were false, the other would also be false, which
would mean two false statements) and C lied. Since A, B both told
the truth and accused B, then B must be guilty.
WHAT WAS THE FATE OF THE GOAT Given the fact that the
Goat lied, it does not follow that the Goat was guilty, nor does it
follow that the Goat was innocent; so, knowing that the Court knew
that the Goat lied, the Court might have convicted the Goat (on the
basis of further evidence, which we don't know about), or they
might have acquitted him (again, on the basis of further evidence),
or they might have done neither, and there is no way of knowing
which. On the other hand, if both Insects told the truth, it must
follow that the Goat was guilty, because both Insects accused the
same creature (since they both told the truth) and neither accused
himself; so they must have both accused the Goat. So the Gentleman
in white paper must have been told that both Insects told the
truth, in order for him to have known what the Court did. He then
knew that the Court convicted the Goat.
THE MOST BAFFLING CASE OF ALL To solve this remarkable
puzzle, we must use the table used in the solution of Problem 83.
To begin with, the Jabberwocky solved the case after knowing
which of the eight cases occurred (that is, knowing what each
defendant said) and knowing that at most one defendant told the
truth. This rules out Cases 4, 6, 7, 8, because in Case 4, there are
180