02.04.2014 Views

Which Alice?

Which Alice?

Which Alice?

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction<br />

In the volume you now hold, <strong>Alice</strong> and her friends are back again<br />

for a puzzle romp behind the Looking-Glass that will please<br />

Carrollians as much as the first book of chess puzzles pleased Baker<br />

Street Irregulars. Ray has done it again. His characters not only talk<br />

and behave exactly like the originals, but the book also swarms with<br />

typically Carrollian word play, logic and metalogic problems, and<br />

dark philosophical paradoxes. In Carroll's nonsense world there<br />

were two <strong>Alice</strong>s: the imaginary one and his real-life child-friend<br />

<strong>Alice</strong> Liddell. In Ray's nonsense world there are also two <strong>Alice</strong>s: a<br />

friend of Ray's, and the imaginary <strong>Alice</strong> of his first book. Carroll<br />

would have loved them both. And he would have been delighted by<br />

Ray's looking-glass package that unwraps itself only when you try to<br />

wrap it, and a hundred other whimsies that Carroll might have<br />

thought of himself if he had been capable of dreaming up<br />

Raymond Smullyan.<br />

As always in Ray's books, curious metaphysical questions have a<br />

way of catching you by surprise. For example, when Humpty<br />

Dumpty tells <strong>Alice</strong> she should think of everything, <strong>Alice</strong> sensibly<br />

declares this to be impossible.<br />

"I never said you could," Humpty replies. "I merely said you<br />

should."<br />

"But is it reasonable to say that I should do something that I<br />

cannot do?"<br />

"That is an interesting problem in Moral Philosophy," answers<br />

Humpty, "but that would take us too far afield."<br />

It would indeed! Ray does not tell you, but Humpty has raised a<br />

famous problem known as Hintikka's paradox, after Jaako Hintikka,<br />

a leader of a fashionable new school of "possible worlds"<br />

philosophers. Is it proper to call morally wrong something a person<br />

cannot do? Hintikka has a notorious argument designed to show it<br />

is wrong to try to do something impossible. There is now a large<br />

literature on this strange question, which belongs to a type of modal<br />

logic called deontic logic. We learned from Carroll that Humpty is<br />

an expert on classical logic and semantics. Now we learn from Ray<br />

that the egg is also an expert on modal logic!<br />

A page or two later, Humpty bewilders <strong>Alice</strong> with an amazing<br />

one-sentence version of another famous paradox that goes under<br />

ix

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!