31.03.2014 Views

g - Lovejoy ISD

g - Lovejoy ISD

g - Lovejoy ISD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Lovejoy</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Board Academy<br />

February 4, 2012


Welcome<br />

Ted Moore<br />

Superintendent


Agenda<br />

1. Welcome – Ted Moore<br />

2. Role of Board of Trustees – Ann Casey<br />

3. Candidate Process – Cindy Booker<br />

4. Academics – Dennis Muizers<br />

5. Special Education – Sancy Fuller<br />

6. Break<br />

7. Hiring Process – Tonya Vining<br />

8. Demographics – Dennis Womack<br />

9. Business Services – Shay Adams


Board Duties<br />

Ann Casey<br />

L<strong>ISD</strong> Board of Trustees, President


Mission Statement<br />

LOVEJOY <strong>ISD</strong>…..<br />

A school, in partnership with parents and<br />

community, committed to providing<br />

opportunities for students to reach their<br />

academic and personal potential in a<br />

changing world.


Board Duties<br />

Overview of School Board Responsibilities<br />

Structure of Governance in Texas:<br />

• Legislature<br />

• SBOE/Commissioner<br />

i<br />

• Local Board<br />

• Superintendent


Board Duties<br />

• By law, “An independent school district<br />

is governed by a board of trustees who, as<br />

a body corporate, shall oversee the<br />

management of the district.”<br />

• Because the board is a body corporate,<br />

members can perform no valid act except<br />

as a body at meetings properly convened<br />

and conducted. (Policy BBE Legal)


Legal Powers and Duties<br />

of the Board include:<br />

• Govern and oversee management<br />

• Adopt a policy to establish a planning<br />

process<br />

• Levy and collect taxes and issue bonds<br />

• Adopt and file a budget<br />

• Have fiscal accounts audited<br />

• Publish an annual performance report


Legal Powers and Duties<br />

of the Board include:<br />

• Receive bequests and donations for the<br />

district<br />

• Acquire and authorize sale of property<br />

• Exercise the right of eminent domain<br />

• Adopt a policy providing for employment<br />

and dd duties of personnel<br />

• Sue and be sued in the name of the<br />

district.


Defining Terms:<br />

Governance (the board’s authority)<br />

• Providing direction through the adoption<br />

of district goals and policies<br />

• Judging the accomplishment of district<br />

goals and the effectiveness of policies<br />

through the evaluation of the<br />

superintendent and the assessment of<br />

district results


Defining Terms:<br />

Management (The superintendent’s authority)<br />

• Putting plans, systems, procedures in place<br />

to accomplish desired outcomes and<br />

priorities<br />

• Monitoring plans, systems, and procedures<br />

for effectiveness in accomplishing desired<br />

results<br />

• Adjusting plans, systems, and procedures as<br />

deemed necessary


Defining Terms:<br />

Oversight of Management (The board’s<br />

authority)<br />

• Making sure goals are clearly defined<br />

• Making sure plans to achieve results exist<br />

• Making sure plans are monitored for<br />

effectiveness and changed if necessary


Defining Terms:<br />

Policy Development<br />

• Policy development is a cooperative effort<br />

involving the board, its local attorney, the<br />

staff, members of the community, and<br />

other information sources<br />

• Policy adoption is the function of the<br />

board


Defining Terms:<br />

Policy Development<br />

• Policy implementation is a function of the<br />

superintendent and staff<br />

• Policy review and evaluation is a function<br />

of the board based on information<br />

received from the staff, its local attorney,<br />

community, and other sources.


Defining Terms:<br />

Chain of Command<br />

• Concerns from citizens should be<br />

addressed to the authority closest to the<br />

problem, then the principal, other<br />

supervisor, and finally the<br />

superintendent before appealing to the<br />

board of trustees.


FAQ–Concerning Board Service<br />

How much time should I expect to spend on school<br />

board work each month?<br />

The board meets at 6 p.m. on the third Tuesday of each<br />

month. The end time varies, but 10 p.m. is typical. 72<br />

hours prior to the meeting trustees receive an electronic<br />

Board Book containing background information which<br />

must be read prior to the meeting. Allow one to two<br />

hours to read thoroughly.<br />

Occasionally, trustees will have other functions to attend<br />

such as an awards banquet, graduation, or a community<br />

information forum.


FAQ–Concerning Board Service<br />

What kind of training is required?<br />

New board members need about 18 hours of initial<br />

training i to understand d areas such as the open meetings<br />

law, school finance, board procedures, and policy<br />

development. After the first year, trustees complete<br />

about ten hours of continuing education each year.<br />

Training is offered by the Texas Association of School<br />

Boards twice in June. Trustees can attend the Summer<br />

Leadership Institute in San Antonio June 14-1616 or in<br />

Forth Worth June 28-30. TASB also offers training in<br />

many topics through online courses.


2011-2012 2012 Board Priority Goals<br />

1. <strong>Lovejoy</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> will leverage our technology<br />

resources to enhance teaching and learning to<br />

ensure that the standards-based approach is<br />

engaging, successful, efficient, and effective.<br />

2. <strong>Lovejoy</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> will continue to demonstrate growth<br />

in student academic achievement as evidenced by<br />

a broad range of measures including a TEA<br />

Rating of Exemplary as well as TEA Gold<br />

Performance Acknowledgements.


2011-2012 2012 Board Priority Goals<br />

3. <strong>Lovejoy</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> will develop math and science<br />

programs which: establish high standards of<br />

student learning, develop innovative approaches<br />

to teaching and learning, and serves as a<br />

lighthouse for math and science instruction in the<br />

K-12 arena.


2011-2012 2012 Focus Areas<br />

1. The <strong>Lovejoy</strong> Graduate Profile is integrated into<br />

the activities and curriculum at all grade levels<br />

and is extended into the community as<br />

appropriate.<br />

2. <strong>Lovejoy</strong> High School will provide an experience<br />

for its graduates that serves to transition them to a<br />

rich array of post high school options. The senior<br />

year serves as the culmination of a planned<br />

developmental approach K-12 designed to prepare<br />

all students for post high school opportunities.


Board Duties<br />

Ann Casey<br />

L<strong>ISD</strong> Board of Trustees, President


Candidate Process<br />

Cindy Booker<br />

Assistant to the Superintendent<br />

for Communication


Candidate Process<br />

• The <strong>Lovejoy</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Board of Trustees consists of<br />

seven trustees serving terms of three years, with<br />

elections held annually. The terms of one-third<br />

of the Trustees, or as near to one-third as<br />

possible, expire each year. Education Code<br />

11.051(b), (),<br />

11.059<br />

• Election Day May 12, 2012


Candidate Process<br />

• Candidate packets are available at the<br />

Administration Building<br />

• Filing Deadline for a Place on Ballot –<br />

March 5, 2012 at 5:00 PM<br />

• More information is available on the<br />

District website select Board of Trustees<br />

and then Election Information


Candidate Process<br />

Cindy Booker<br />

Assistant to the Superintendent<br />

for Communication


<strong>Lovejoy</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Academic Program<br />

Dennis Muizers<br />

Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum,<br />

Instruction and Assessment


<strong>Lovejoy</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Academic Program<br />

• Three Objective Data Elements<br />

• The Texas Education Agency<br />

• The College Board<br />

• National Center for Educational Achievement<br />

(NCEA)<br />

• Measures include all levels of performance


TEA Data Elements<br />

• TEA<br />

• District ratings (focus on met standard of TAKS, % of<br />

students who meet ARD expectations, drop-out out rate)<br />

• Gold Performance Acknowledgements (focus on<br />

“advanced academics” with TAKS commended<br />

performance, advanced course enrollment, SAT/ACT<br />

averages, etc.)<br />

• Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) annual<br />

report on data elements including staffing and general<br />

finance.


TEA Ratings for 2010-2011<br />

2011<br />

• Exemplary district<br />

•One of 61 in Texas<br />

• No TPM<br />

• Commended Performance of<br />

Econ. Dis.<br />

• All campuses Exemplary


Subject<br />

L<strong>ISD</strong> 2011 Met Standard<br />

d<br />

Percent<br />

Met<br />

Standard<br />

d<br />

Exemplary<br />

Performance<br />

Level<br />

Reading 99% √<br />

Math 97% √<br />

Writing 99% √<br />

Science 97% √<br />

Social Studies 99% √


L<strong>ISD</strong> 2011 Commended d Performance<br />

Subject<br />

Percent<br />

Commended<br />

Gold<br />

Performance<br />

Level<br />

Reading 63% √<br />

Math 60% √<br />

Writing 70% √<br />

Science 55% √<br />

Social Studies 73% √


Texas District TAKS 2010-1111 Ranking for<br />

Commended Performance Grades 3-11<br />

6<br />

1085<br />

L<strong>ISD</strong> is in the Top 1 %<br />

1144<br />

Writing 7<br />

2011<br />

18<br />

1171<br />

2010<br />

12<br />

1157<br />

2009<br />

2008<br />

7<br />

L<strong>ISD</strong> is in the Top 1 %<br />

1156<br />

1168<br />

Reading_ELA 9<br />

11<br />

1226<br />

4<br />

1225<br />

Math<br />

6<br />

6<br />

5<br />

6<br />

L<strong>ISD</strong> is in the Top 1 %<br />

1154<br />

1168<br />

1226<br />

1225<br />

Science<br />

13<br />

23<br />

26<br />

41<br />

L<strong>ISD</strong> is in the Top 1 %<br />

1131<br />

1147<br />

1213<br />

1210<br />

Social Studies<br />

15<br />

19<br />

11<br />

27<br />

L<strong>ISD</strong> is in the Top 1 %<br />

1070<br />

1098<br />

1156<br />

1157


District AEIS Summary<br />

• Exemplary Rating<br />

• Gold Performance Acknowledgments<br />

• Attendance Rate<br />

• AP Results<br />

• Commended<br />

• Reading/ELA<br />

• Math<br />

• Writing<br />

• Science<br />

• Social Studies


Gold Performance<br />

Ak Acknowledgments<br />

ld • Advanced Course/Dual Enrollment Course<br />

(30% or more) L<strong>ISD</strong> 51.4%<br />

• College Ready Graduates (40% or more)—<br />

L<strong>ISD</strong> 76%<br />

• Recommended HS or DAP (85% or more)<br />

L<strong>ISD</strong> 95.1%


SAT/ACT for 2010 and 2011<br />

Average SAT Score Mean Score # Test Takers<br />

2010 1086 137<br />

2011 1096 205<br />

Average ACT Score Composite<br />

Score # Test Takers<br />

2010 24 99<br />

2011 24 136


Impact of Income on SAT Mean<br />

• On every test section,<br />

moving up an income<br />

category was associated<br />

with an average score<br />

boost of over 12 points.<br />

• Moving from the<br />

second-highest income<br />

group and the highest<br />

income group seemed to<br />

show the biggest score<br />

boost.<br />

• However, keep in mind<br />

, p<br />

the top income category is<br />

uncapped, so it includes a<br />

much broader spectrum of<br />

families by wealth.


Advanced Placement Program<br />

• Students<br />

t<br />

• College-level level courses taught in a high school<br />

setting<br />

• International program with 34 courses and<br />

examinations offered in 19 subject areas<br />

• Most are junior and senior level courses<br />

• Educators<br />

• Workshops and institutes for teachers<br />

• Training for administrators


AP Exams<br />

• Approximately 3 hours in length<br />

• Two sections:<br />

• Multiple Choice (about 75 questions)<br />

• Free Response (essays and/or problems)<br />

• Scored on a scale of 1 to 5<br />

•Scores of 3, 4, and 5 usually considered to be<br />

equivalent to college scores of C, B, and A


L<strong>ISD</strong> 25 AP Courses<br />

AtHit Art History<br />

Macroeconomics<br />

Biology<br />

Music Theory<br />

Calculus (AB & BC)<br />

Physics B<br />

Chemistry<br />

Psychology<br />

Chinese Language<br />

Spanish Language<br />

Computer Science (A)<br />

Spanish Literature<br />

English Lang. & Comp.<br />

Statistics<br />

English Lit. & Comp.<br />

Studio Art (2-D, 3-D, and<br />

Environmental Science<br />

Drawing)<br />

European History<br />

US U.S. History<br />

French Language<br />

World History<br />

Government, U.S.


<strong>Lovejoy</strong> AP Philosophy<br />

While in the safer environment of home, all students<br />

who intend to be college bound should take at least<br />

one AP course before graduating.<br />

All students who enroll in an AP course are required<br />

to take the AP exam.<br />

Acting on this inclusive model creates a situation in<br />

which the percentage of students who score a 3 or<br />

higher as well as the test mean score could be<br />

lowered.


Benefits of AP as a Legitimate Choice<br />

• 2007 UT Austin Study<br />

• Students who have passed AP tests (scored 3 or<br />

better) do better than peers who have not taken<br />

AP courses or peers who have done dual<br />

enrollment while in high school.<br />

• Even students who score at 2 on an AP test<br />

perform better than peers who have not taken<br />

AP courses or peers who have done dual<br />

enrollment while in high school.


AP Enrollment in <strong>Lovejoy</strong><br />

• In 2010, LHS administered 587 AP tests in April.<br />

• In 2011 , 855 tests were given.<br />

• In 2012, 1350 tests projected this May.<br />

• In 2011, 75% (172 of 229)seniors took at least one AP<br />

course.<br />

• Of these 172 students, 61 (35%) took an AP course for the<br />

first time as a senior.


THE 2010 AP SCHOLARS<br />

AWARDS Compared to 2011<br />

‣AP SCHOLAR<br />

‣Scores of 3 or higher on 3 or more AP<br />

exams<br />

‣35 students in 2010, 42 in 2011<br />

‣AP SCHOLAR WITH HONORS<br />

‣Scores of 3 or higher h on 4 or more AP<br />

exams<br />

‣Average score of 3.25<br />

‣10 students in 2010, 21 in 2011


THE 2010 AP SCHOLARS<br />

AWARDS compared to 2011<br />

‣ AP SCHOLAR WITH DISTINCTION<br />

‣ Scores of 3 or higher on 5 or more AP exams<br />

‣ Average score of 3.5<br />

‣ 14 students in 2010, 21 in 2011<br />

‣ NATIONAL AP SCHOLAR<br />

‣ Scores of f4 or higher h on 8 or more AP exams<br />

‣ Average grade of 4 or higher<br />

‣ 2 students in 2010, 5 in 2011


AP Scholars<br />

• In 2010, <strong>Lovejoy</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> had 65 AP Scholars.<br />

• This represented 16% of the eligible<br />

students.<br />

• In 2011, <strong>Lovejoy</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> had 89 AP Scholars.<br />

• This represents nearly 20% of the eligible<br />

students.


AP Scholars and GPA<br />

• Of the 42 AP scholars, 24 were graduates in<br />

the Class of 2011.<br />

• Rank and GPA indicates:<br />

• 10 in top 25%<br />

• 9 in second quarter<br />

• 4 in third quarter<br />

• 1 in fourth quarter


NCEA (National Center for<br />

Eduational Achievement)<br />

• NCEA measures highest levels of state<br />

assessment performance (Commended<br />

Performance on TAKS)<br />

• NCEA recognizes schools based on student<br />

performance over time and demographics.<br />

• TBEC Honor Roll is based on NCEA data.<br />

Only top 4% of schools in Texas are<br />

honored.


District Practices<br />

• District Benchmarks<br />

• Collaborative Planning<br />

• Developing Mental Model of the appropriate<br />

depth and complexity of the TEKS<br />

• Interventions based on Data<br />

• Instructional ti lL Leadership<br />

• Professional Development


District Practices<br />

Our teachers have adopted the best practices of:<br />

• Teaching to the specifics in our state standards, the<br />

TEKS;<br />

• Planning collaboratively to share best ideas;<br />

• Benchmark testing about every 9 weeks to determine<br />

students’ mastery levels; and<br />

• Providing interventions for students to improve<br />

his/her performance.


<strong>Lovejoy</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Academic Program<br />

Dennis Muizers<br />

Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum,<br />

Instruction and Assessment


Special Education<br />

Sancy Fuller<br />

Executive Director of Special<br />

Education & Academic Support


SPECIAL EDUCATION<br />

Supports for Students<br />

t<br />

PST 504<br />

Special<br />

Ed


PST: PROBLEM SOLVING TEAM<br />

• All campuses have a team in place<br />

• Group meets to determine if interventions<br />

and/monitoring is needed<br />

• Support provided in the area of academics<br />

and behavior


504<br />

• The purpose of the Section 504 of the<br />

Rehabilitation Act is to prohibit discrimination<br />

and to assure that students who are disabled, (a<br />

physical or mental impairment), have<br />

educational opportunities and benefits equal to<br />

those provided to non-disabled students.<br />

• Every campus has a Section 504 Coordinator<br />

• Accommodations


SPECIAL EDUCATION<br />

4000<br />

<strong>Lovejoy</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> SPED Student Ratio<br />

3500<br />

3000<br />

2500<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

2007-2008 2008 2008-2009 2009 2009-2010 2010 2010-2011 2011 2011-2012<br />

2012<br />

Total # Enrolled 2501 2873 3229 3427 3550<br />

Total # SPED Students 152 177 213 246 254<br />

Total % of SPED Students Enrolled 6% 6% 7% 7% 7%<br />

* Data for 2011-2012 is as of 01/30/2012


SPECIAL EDUCATION cont.<br />

• Students<br />

• Parents<br />

• Post ARD Survey<br />

• Workshops<br />

• Build It And They Will Come<br />

• Staff


Special Education TAKS Participation Profile<br />

.<br />

Student Testing<br />

State Region 10 <strong>Lovejoy</strong><br />

Group<br />

TAKS or another 98.6% 98.7% 99.4%<br />

State Assessment<br />

One or more TAKS 91% 90.9% 95.6%<br />

tests<br />

Not tTested with<br />

76% 7.6% 77% 7.7% 38% 3.8%<br />

Regular TAKS test


Dyslexia<br />

• The program provides direct instruction for<br />

students in the areas of phonics & spelling.<br />

• All campuses have students that receive<br />

services from a dyslexia therapist.<br />

• TAKE FLIGHT-Multi-Sensory teaching<br />

approach (seeing,/hearing /touching)


COUNSELORS<br />

• Campus support for staff and students<br />

• Character lessons for students<br />

• Resource for parents & students<br />

• Cii Crisis Support


COMMUNITY<br />

Parent Support Groups<br />

• Provide almost monthly workshops on<br />

relevant topics (ADHD, Dyslexia, ARD<br />

Basics, Autism, Relaxation, etc.)


Special Education<br />

Sancy Fuller<br />

Executive Director of Special<br />

Education & Academic Support


Hiring Great Teachers<br />

Tonya Vining<br />

Executive Director of Human Resources


We believe that hiring the right people<br />

is one of our most important jobs;<br />

therefore, we place great emphasis<br />

on the hiring process.


Behavior Based Interviewing<br />

• Accuracy exceeds traditional interviewing<br />

accuracy by three to seven times<br />

• Improved accuracy makes Behavior Based<br />

interviewing extremely cost effective<br />

• Cream-of-the crop applicants prefer<br />

Behavior Based interviews & are more<br />

willing to accept jobs with organizations<br />

that use them


Behavior Based Interviewing<br />

• Based on the premise that past behavior is<br />

the best predictor of future performance.<br />

• Hiring decisions based on actual behavior<br />

are far more accurate than those based on<br />

gut feeling.<br />

• Must know what you are looking for to get<br />

what you want.


Behavior Based Interviewing<br />

• Decide what specific skills and experiences<br />

are necessary to ensure success of the new<br />

hire in your school setting<br />

• Design questions around those skills and<br />

experiences<br />

• Call upon the candidate to relate<br />

experiences in previous teaching, student<br />

teaching or field experience


Behavior Based Interviewing<br />

• Helps the interviewer sort the candidates<br />

• Have had the training<br />

• Know the pertinent skills<br />

• Able to start teaching on day one


The <strong>Lovejoy</strong> Way<br />

• Six hours per candidate<br />

• Three weeks<br />

• Team of administrators<br />

i


Important Attributes<br />

• Ability to build relationships with students<br />

and their parents<br />

• Undeniable mission<br />

• Highly coach-able<br />

able<br />

• Values working on a collaborative team<br />

• Effective teaching experience<br />

• Ability to demonstrate skills developed<br />

since becoming a teacher


Leave Nothing to Chance<br />

NOTES TO LOVEJOY <strong>ISD</strong> ELEMENTARY INTERVIEW TEAM:<br />

Prepare for Interview<br />

Gather Information<br />

Evaluate<br />

RATING DESCRIPTIONS:<br />

Outstanding Applicant = 5<br />

Above Average Applicant = 4<br />

Adequate Applicant = 3<br />

Below Average Applicant = 2<br />

Unacceptable Applicant = 1


Multi-Step Process<br />

• Paper Screen<br />

• Phone Screen<br />

• Round Robin Interview<br />

• Final Interview<br />

• Teach a Lesson


Written Exercise<br />

Please read article “Not Just a Necessary Evil” and respond to the questions below. You<br />

have 20 minutes to read and respond<br />

1. Although the article outlines the benefits of standards for large, urban districts, describe how<br />

standards can impact a district like <strong>Lovejoy</strong>.<br />

2. Describe your personal experience with one or more of the consistent benefits of standards<br />

found in the school districts that were studied for the 2004 Broad prize.<br />

3. What are your opinions of the pros and cons of standards (TEKS) and state assessment<br />

(TAKS) in Texas?


Round Robin Questions<br />

Station 2<br />

Scenario:<br />

You are a team leader and your team has been planning and working together since the<br />

beginning of school to try and align what you are presenting in class. You have given a<br />

critical nine week assessment. The results return and more than half of your team’s students<br />

have been unsuccessful on this critical assessment. Additionally, half of the students who<br />

failed missed more than half of the questions. Your students are frustrated and your team<br />

members are upset. You even hear some team members say, “It’s just that assessment.”


Interview Rating Form<br />

Very Strong<br />

Evidence Skill Is<br />

Present<br />

(5)<br />

Strong<br />

Evidence Skill Is<br />

Present<br />

(4)<br />

Some<br />

Evidence Skill Is<br />

Present<br />

(3)<br />

Strong<br />

Evidence Skill Is<br />

Not Present<br />

(2)<br />

Very Strong<br />

Evidence Skill Is<br />

Not Present<br />

(1)<br />

Teamwork /<br />

Leadership /<br />

Relationships<br />

Graduate<br />

Profile /<br />

Student<br />

Development<br />

Management of<br />

Tasks<br />

(C& I)<br />

Subtotal of each<br />

column<br />

Total of columns _________ Divided by 3 = ___________


Letter to Applicants<br />

Dear Applicant:<br />

Thank you so much for taking time to visit with us today. Over the next couple of weeks we will be<br />

completing our first round of interviews pulling from approximately 1,000 applicants who want to be a part<br />

of the <strong>Lovejoy</strong> family. We will contact those who we feel are qualified for the final round of interviews. We<br />

have less than five elementary school positions available between our three elementary campuses.<br />

If you are contacted to be involved in the next round of interviews, we will ask you to provide evidence of<br />

your success in the field. When requested please provide three of the following:<br />

1) A lesson plan<br />

2) Supportive student data<br />

3) An example of a major project description and rubric used<br />

4) Summary of Professional Development<br />

5) Example of effective use of technology in the classroom<br />

6) Video of your teaching/instructing<br />

We were honored to have met you and dthank you again for wanting to be a part of fthe <strong>Lovejoy</strong> family.<br />

Best Regards,


Final Call Back<br />

• Traditional final interview with the<br />

principal<br />

• Includes a central office team member<br />

• Asks follow-up questions based on round<br />

robin interview i and/or written exercise


Formal Induction Process<br />

• New hires invited to board meeting<br />

• Principals introduce each new hire to the<br />

board and the community<br />

• Receive a few tokens to facilitate their<br />

joining i<br />

of our team<br />

• PTA members are present to welcome them<br />

and give them a personalized note


Hiring Great Teachers<br />

Tonya Vining<br />

i<br />

Executive Director of Human Resources


Demographics<br />

Dennis Womack<br />

Assistant Superintendent for Operations


Puster ES<br />

Sloan Creek MS<br />

<strong>Lovejoy</strong> ES<br />

<strong>Lovejoy</strong> HS<br />

Elem #4<br />

Hart ES<br />

Willow Springs MS


Highest Ratios of Students per Home


Growing Developments


L<strong>ISD</strong> Growth Projections<br />

6000<br />

5500<br />

5000<br />

4500<br />

4000<br />

3500<br />

3000<br />

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21


Elementary Seats -vs- Projected Enrollment<br />

2200<br />

2200<br />

2000<br />

2000<br />

1800<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

800<br />

600<br />

600<br />

400<br />

400<br />

200<br />

200<br />

0<br />

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21<br />

0<br />

Elementary Seats<br />

Elementary Enrollment Projected


Middle School Seats -vs- Projected Enrollment<br />

1800<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

800<br />

600<br />

600<br />

400<br />

400<br />

200<br />

200<br />

0<br />

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21<br />

0<br />

Middle School Seats Current<br />

Middle School Enrollment Projected


K-4 Elementary Seats -vs- Projected Enrollment<br />

2000<br />

2000<br />

1800<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

800<br />

600<br />

600<br />

400<br />

400<br />

200<br />

200<br />

0<br />

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21<br />

0<br />

Elementary Seats<br />

Elementary Enrollment


Grades 5 & 6<br />

Seats -vs- Projected Enrollment<br />

1000<br />

1000<br />

900<br />

900<br />

800<br />

800<br />

700<br />

700<br />

600<br />

600<br />

500<br />

500<br />

400<br />

400<br />

300<br />

300<br />

200<br />

200<br />

100<br />

100<br />

0<br />

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21<br />

0<br />

Intermediate School Seats<br />

Intermediate School Enrollment


1000<br />

Grades 7 & 8<br />

Seats -vs- Projected Enrollment<br />

1000<br />

900<br />

900<br />

800<br />

800<br />

700<br />

700<br />

600<br />

600<br />

500<br />

500<br />

400<br />

400<br />

300<br />

300<br />

200<br />

200<br />

100<br />

100<br />

0<br />

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21<br />

0<br />

MiddleSchool Seats<br />

Middle School Enrollment


High School Seats -vs- Projected Enrollment<br />

1800<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

800<br />

600<br />

600<br />

400<br />

400<br />

200<br />

200<br />

0<br />

2011-12 12 2012-13 13 2013-14 14 2014-15 15 2015-16 16 2016-17 17 2017-18 18 2018-19 19 2019-20 2020-21<br />

21<br />

0<br />

High School Seats<br />

High School Enrollment Projected


Timeline for Facility Planning and Construction<br />

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018<br />

J FMAMJ JASONDJ FMAMJ JASONDJ FMAMJ JASONDJ FMAMJ JASONDJ FMAMJ JASONDJ FMAMJ JASONDJ FMAMJ JASONDJ FMAMJ JASON<br />

WSMS<br />

LHS Phase IV<br />

Elem #4<br />

Planning<br />

Construction


Demographics<br />

Dennis Womack<br />

Assistant Superintendent for Operations


Business Services<br />

Shay Adams<br />

Chief Financial Officer


Overview<br />

• Budget Adoption Process / Calendar<br />

• Types of Funds / Tax Rates<br />

• Expenditures & Revenue<br />

• Internal Controls<br />

• Fund balance


Financial Opportunities<br />

• Provide excellent stewardship of taxpayer<br />

dollars<br />

• Maximize the return on investment of tax<br />

dollars<br />

• Keep our board, taxpayers and employees<br />

informed and educated on how school<br />

finance impacts <strong>Lovejoy</strong> <strong>ISD</strong>


Texas Education Agency<br />

Budget tD Deadlines<br />

Note: Two critical dates for budget<br />

preparation/adoption have been mandated by<br />

TEA<br />

(1) June 19th- the district budget must be prepared by this date<br />

(2) June 30th- the district budget must be adopted by the school<br />

board by this


School District Budget Process<br />

The budget process includes three basic steps:<br />

1. The establishment of an overall district revenue<br />

projection.<br />

2. The development of budgets or expenditure<br />

plans for each school and central office<br />

department.<br />

3. Review and approval of the district budget by<br />

the board of trustees.


Types of Funds<br />

General Fund – Operating fund aka Maintenance &<br />

Operation fund. The tax rate for this fund is currently<br />

$1.06 . With our taxable property value of<br />

$1,656,287,039 – we raise about $138,600 per penny<br />

of tax rate.<br />

Debt Service – aka Interest & Sinking fund used solely<br />

for the purpose of repaying debt incurred upon<br />

taxpayer approval. The tax rate for this fund is<br />

currently $.475.


Types of Funds<br />

Construction Fund – aka Bond funds. This funds serves as<br />

basically an escrow account that holds the proceeds of a bond<br />

issue (approved by the voters) until the projects are complete or<br />

partially complete and then builders, architects, vendors, etc. are<br />

paid from this account. There is no tax rate associated with this<br />

fund because the bonds are paid back through taxes collected in<br />

the Debt Service fund<br />

Child Nutrition Fund – This fund is supported by the sales of<br />

lunches and other food items in our cafeterias. The expenditures<br />

incurred df for the operations are offset by the revenue to make it a<br />

self-sufficient sufficient fund.


The Total Tax Rate<br />

Maintenance & Operations $1.06<br />

Debt Service $ .475<br />

Total Tax Rate $1.535


$29,385,927 Total Proposed Budget<br />

(2011-2012)<br />

2012)<br />

•Includes over $2 million in budget reductions<br />

•Includes $762K additions of:<br />

•Additional personnel / reassignment of personnel<br />

•One time payment per employee<br />

•Online Chinese Program<br />

•Fuel Cost Increase<br />

•School Bus Purchase<br />

•Apple Leases (year 1)<br />

•Includes both revenue & expenditure increases for Technology<br />

Allotment formerly recorded in another fund<br />

•Includes Set-aside for contingent personnel<br />

•Includes $500,000 Set-aside for designated fund balance


<strong>Lovejoy</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Percentages by Object tCl Classification<br />

6100 – Personnel $22,646,526 77 %<br />

6200 – Contracted Services $ 2,800,753 10 %<br />

6300 – Supplies & Materials $ 2,071,289 7 %<br />

6400 – Travel & Other $ 1,229,629 4 %<br />

6600 – Capital Outlay/Fund Bal $ 637,730730 2%<br />

$29,385,927 100 %


Internal Controls<br />

• 77 % personnel costs are basically<br />

controlled by the board’s approval of new<br />

positions<br />

• 23% remaining budget is allocated to 18<br />

budget managers with local control codes<br />

that allow reporting and approval<br />

processing to be customized<br />

• ALL expenditures go through an intricate<br />

process for approval to expend


Internal Controls<br />

• Encumbrances<br />

• Purchase Requisitions<br />

• First layer is approved by one of the 18 budget<br />

managers<br />

• Second layer is reviewed for curriculum /<br />

program poga alignment twt with district<br />

dst • Third layer is reviewed for financial audit<br />

compliance<br />

• Fourth and final review is for purchase<br />

pricing/contract accuracy


Overall District Revenue Projection<br />

• Revenue is estimated/projected based on<br />

formulas provided and mandated by the<br />

state<br />

• Every publicly funded school district in the<br />

State of Texas uses the same template &<br />

components<br />

• Each district must a budget based on the<br />

projection…so it must be as precise as<br />

possible


Solving the Equation…<br />

• The components of the formulas include such numbers as:<br />

• Average Daily Attendance (ADA)<br />

• Determined by students & parents, as well as growth<br />

• State Assigned Taxable Value of properties within the district<br />

• Determined by the Comptrollers office vs Tax Appraiser based on<br />

economy & market<br />

• Tax collection rate<br />

• Determined by the taxpayers<br />

• Full Time Equivalents (FTE’s) of special populations served<br />

• Determined by individual student needs<br />

• Wealth Per Pupil<br />

• Determined by legislature l definition<br />

iti<br />

• Historical data referenced by legislation<br />

• Determined by legislative directive


Solving the Equation…<br />

• We must know the difference between what we<br />

CAN spend (cash flow) and what we SHOULD<br />

spend (funds earned)<br />

• TEA summary of finance is NOT a picture of<br />

what IS happening in our district this year, it is<br />

the most EDUCATED GUESS of what<br />

MIGHT happen in our district this year if none<br />

of the components change


Overall District Revenue Projection<br />

• Assumes an ADA of 3,372<br />

• Assumed a 6.7% reduction in<br />

funding for 2011-2012 2012 (until we<br />

had definite information from<br />

Legislature)


What does that mean?<br />

• Basically, the only way to increase revenue<br />

is to gain students<br />

• In order to fund increases in the budget,<br />

districts i must either operate in the deficit<br />

i<br />

(from fund balance) or cut costs in existing<br />

programs


Fund Balance History<br />

Fund Balance<br />

2005-2006 Fund Balance $ 7,933,935<br />

2006-2007 Fund Balance $ 8,152,344<br />

2007-20082008 Fund Balance (restated) $ 7,599,249<br />

2008-2009 Fund Balance $ 7,607,573<br />

2009-2010 2010 Fund Balance $8,334,014<br />

2010-2011 Fund Balance $9,096,757


Fund Balances<br />

Undesignated dF Fund Balance - Current tB Balance $8,152,052<br />

aka Savings Account. These funds are maintained by the district<br />

primarily to pay for operations and to utilize for cash flow prior<br />

to tax collections. They are also utilized to fund projects &<br />

improvements beyond the normal annual operations, (i.e. minor<br />

renovations of buildings, bus purchases, etc.)<br />

Designated Fund Balance – Current Balance $762,743<br />

With another $500,000 000 line item budgeted d in the 2011-2012<br />

2012<br />

Funds designated by action of the Board of Trustees for a<br />

specific intent (i.e. the transition into new building)


Function 35 – Student Nutrition<br />

Program<br />

$1,612,256<br />

Operation p of cafeteria<br />

Food, supplies & labor<br />

Operates to be self-sufficient program


Function 71 – Debt Service<br />

$6,900,876<br />

Repayment of debt approved by voters<br />

during bond election<br />

Separate ate portion o of tax rate (.475)<br />

Only use of these collections is for this<br />

purpose


Financial Transparency<br />

• Publication of accounts payable monthly check register for<br />

all district disbursements via link on <strong>Lovejoy</strong> <strong>ISD</strong> Website<br />

• FIRST report to continue and expand disclosures per<br />

House Bill<br />

• Superintendent’s current employment contract<br />

• Reimbursements to Superintendent and each school board member<br />

• Superintendent compensation from any outside source<br />

• Superintendent, executive level office and board member gifts<br />

received of $250 or more<br />

• Board member aggregate business transactions


Resources<br />

• Finance Reports<br />

• Monthly updates - Budget Status or Amendments<br />

• Quarterly updates - Investments & Estimates<br />

• Annual update – Independent Audit<br />

• L<strong>ISD</strong> Business Services Website<br />

• Check registers<br />

• Board Reports<br />

• Audits<br />

• Budgets<br />

• External Resources<br />

• Texas Education Agency – FIRST Rating<br />

• Texas State Comptroller – Gold Seal for Transparency<br />

• National Rating Agencies –S & P AA- & Moody’s Aa2


Business Services<br />

Shay Adams<br />

Chief Financial Officer

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!